Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, so just been to see my friend, she still has her head firmly in the sand and had a pile of unopened post, thankfully nothing serious apart from this case!    In answer to your question it says N24 General Directions Order at the bottom of the page, then on page 2 where the line says "As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) " this is N271 Notice of transfer of proceedings.  Within the stack of letters I found 2 from Kearns Solicitors,    02-12-2022 Document pack with covering letter stating under the s78 CCA please see enclosed  1) A copy of the executed Credit Agreement, 2)  A copy of the terms & conditions 3) A copy of the varied terms & conditions applicable at termination / assignment, and  4) A statement regarding the conduct of your account as requested by s78(1)(a) to (c)  (Would you like me to describe the documents attached?)   18-02-2023 Generic letter asking for her to contact them to discuss settlement or they will take to court for further legal action. 
    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
    • civil recovery schemes run by the likes of RLP DWF etc etc are a scam. totally IGNORE EVERYTHING. no if's or but's dx  
    • I’m 17 years old and Received 2 letters from dwf with my name spelt wrong and they are asking for for £230.40. I rang dwf civil recovery the first time upon taking advice from citizens advice to explain to delay to deadline as I was in the process of receiving advice which wasn’t much help. When that deadline was done I then called again to delay the deadline as I’m struggling financially and it’s lot of money they are asking for and I tried to dispute the cost to which they said okay we will delay it another 7 days for you to dispute the cost but I asked them how do I dispute this to you or Sainsbury’s and they said “we can’t advise you on this matter” I’ve read a lot of threads saying to ignore them but I was unsure now as I’ve made contact and have tried to dispute the payment and pay it which might mean I have admitted. Would they just persist harder and take me to court eventually or file for a ccj.   I would like to ignore them still but I would like to send a strong email so they know I’m clued up and then ignore them. I also want to pay the reasonable amount and get this matter solved. any advice on the law or similar situations are helpful when I called them I asked for an itemised bill. £101 stolen goods  ( supposedly caught me because they watched me on cctv over the duration of the week) also why did they not stop me in the first day. £20.40 recovered goods £150 security costs     Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

LTSB loan passed to BLS who are now harassing and making threats - advice please


jc1234
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

LTSB have now written back to me saying they do now know who I am but that they are unable to provide a copy of the original loan application document 'due to the amount of time that has elapsed since inception of this account.' They also enclose a cheque as a refund of the fee I have paid.

 

I am concerned about presenting the cheque as this will then give LTSB access to my bank details - something they do not have at present. Also I am amazed how they have changed from 'we have no idea who you are' to 'it's all too long ago now'.

 

Secondly, I have had a further missive from BLS - oh how these bring a smile to my face now!! Apparently I will recall that we agreed a repayment plan that took into account my current circumstances at the time - no mention of what was agreed or when. BLS are now disappointed to note that I have failed to adhere to my commitment - oh yes, how exactly??? Has not the amount due been reducing each month by my monthly payment??

 

Sorry BLS, please forgive me for not telephoning you TODAY as you so subtly demand.

 

I should appreciate any advice regarding presenting the cheque from LTSB - for the sake of £10 I would rather keep my bank details to myself!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks kurvaface - as always great advice!

 

I had also meant to ask about LTSB not providing a copy of the original loan application. Personally I think that is reasonable as it is 10 years ago, but as I wish to cause them as much aggravation as they have caused me, are they actually allowed to do this?

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this their response to your CCA request or your data subject access request? Did they return £1 0r £10.

 

 

LTSB have now written back to me saying they do now know who I am but that they are unable to provide a copy of the original loan application document 'due to the amount of time that has elapsed since inception of this account.' They also enclose a cheque as a refund of the fee I have paid.

 

I am concerned about presenting the cheque as this will then give LTSB access to my bank details - something they do not have at present. Also I am amazed how they have changed from 'we have no idea who you are' to 'it's all too long ago now'.

 

Secondly, I have had a further missive from BLS - oh how these bring a smile to my face now!! Apparently I will recall that we agreed a repayment plan that took into account my current circumstances at the time - no mention of what was agreed or when. BLS are now disappointed to note that I have failed to adhere to my commitment - oh yes, how exactly??? Has not the amount due been reducing each month by my monthly payment??

 

Sorry BLS, please forgive me for not telephoning you TODAY as you so subtly demand.

 

I should appreciate any advice regarding presenting the cheque from LTSB - for the sake of £10 I would rather keep my bank details to myself!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

 

This sounds like they are majorly messing you around.

 

I would submit a data subject access request to the dsar team at lloyds asking for every bit of info they have, specifically any contracts, credit agreements etc that they have in your name. Also ask for transcripts of all calls between you and the bank. (lloyds do provide them and they will come on an encrypted cd)

 

Submit the sar to your local branch and get a receipt for delivery and advise you can collect from the branch. One tactic lloyds uses is to lose sars in the royal mail.

 

If they do not provide the basis on which they are hounding you in the package that comes back within 40days, I would tell them to sling their hook.

 

I suspect lloyds has no agreement with you and they are just trying to frustrate you into submitting by being awkward and evasive.

 

Do a sar. Inform them if they don't comply you will start legal action against them aswell as informing the ICO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I am now getting very confused. I had a letter from LTSB dated 30th December 2009 saying thanks for the £10 and they will have my personal information ready for me by 30th January 2010 but that I would need to collect this from a branch.

 

I responded saying please post to me at my home address as you have sent previous confidential information. Now they have sent me a cheque back for £10 saying they cannot provide a copy of the original loan application. This came from Data Subject Access Requests and took 4 days for them to post according to the post mark!

 

I thought that the SAR was not limited to the loan application. Does this mean that they are denying my request, and if so, should I go to the Information Commissioners Office and report this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either they are lying to you and not providing the data that you have asked for under your rights set out in the Data Protection Act, or they are (Unlawfully perhaps) enforcing a nonexistant contract.

 

One or the other I think.

 

or both?

Edited by kurvaface
Link to post
Share on other sites

can you confirm that you have sent two seperate letters?

 

a cca request with £1 and a seperate sarwith £10

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I have received today a letter from LTSB (dated 26.02.10 - love their postal efficiency) giving me a statement of movement on my account. The period covers 26th Feb 2009 to 26th Feb 2010 and is pretty useless. They do say that this statement does not contain all the information that I am entitled to receive, and I should get in touch with them to receive that.

 

Is this yet another trick on the part of LTSB or are they really stupid enough to think I won't ask for all the information?

 

I should be very grateful for opinions on this, also suggestions (polite please!!) of what to write back to them with - I am only coming up with sarcasm at the moment.

 

Thank you all for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Royds TSB have said that they cannot provide a copy of your original loan agreement, then you can legally stop paying them (unless you already have) - regardless of what BLS or Royds say!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have kept up to date with my payments. In one of the letters they wrote to me, they claimed they could not provide a copy of the original loan agreement due to the length of time that had passed since taking it out. This actually seems a fair point to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not fair at all.

 

On what basis are you paying them if there is no agreement?

 

If you feel obliged to pay them something, perhaps offer to set new terms, such as -

 

" I will pay you 10 pence a month for twelve months and then our business is concluded. If you phone me or harass me there will be a £30 charge to handle administration costs etc...... "

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks kurvaface. I am paying them on the basis that I know I borrowed the money and defaulted (as advised by my bank manager!) and am just fed up of the harassment from BLS and their letters that try to frighten you. I now want to cause them maximum bother and aggravation as payback - but I do actually owe this money (well, most of it now is all the fees and penalties and interest they loaded on even though I was in constant communication)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much kurvaface, I shall now get to drafting a letter to LTSB/BLS. I think I am going to have some fun here. I am thinking also of returning their cheque and requesting a postal order as that is the form in which I made payment to them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As of now, if it were me, I'd stop paying anything at all in this situation, regardless of whether the money's owed or not.

 

You've said most of it is fees and penalities, so I'd stop just on that principle. Royds knows full well that such penalities are unlawful, but in their arrogance continues to impose them.

 

As kurvaface rightly points out, you're now in a good position to cause them bother - and why should you continue paying off a debt that the creditor has just said they can't prove?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you F DCAs, I think my money could be far better spent - like on supporting this forum!

 

I have decided that I shall write to them detailing everything they have done and not done, and stating that due to their own admission that they cannot prove the debt, I give them 28 days notice that I shall make one last payment of £xx in full and final settlement and after that I have no desire for them ever to contact me again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...