Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello! After emailing them I received this reply:   I have drafted the following, please would you be able to comment as to if you think it is correct/sufficient? "Thank you for your email.   Thanks you for confirming that the vehicle does not have these features as stated in the advertisement.    I am sure you are aware that the Consumer Rights Act 2015 provides the short term right to reject within 30 days. Statutory rights cannot be taken away from a consumer, and any attempt to do so is illegal.   Please can you advise how best to return the vehicle?" Thanks in advance!
    • I find that highly disrespectful Sir/Madam just so you know.
    • Not quite sure what you are trying to say but anyway please could you avoid posting solid blocks of text because it is extremely difficult for people to follow – especially if they are using small screen such as telephones. I have restructured your post above. Properly spaced and punctuated please. Thanks
    • I have received an email from town and country on behalf of everday loans. I assume I don’t reply to the email?   Any advice appreciated 
    • Hello, my name is Chris and aswell as saying hello, am checking my posts pop out nicely.  I have  an ongoing problem with British Gas(which shouldn't have become a problem at all), which has cannonballed into recently involving the Energy Ombudsman, Ofgem and I even, hasten to add our government because I am at wit's end. I have a couple of questions. What I write is likely to be mammoth size, I really would like to indicate why I am at wit's end, and as far as I am concerned (conjecture and opinion) its an indication of the inadequacy of our country's system that since and including John Major has been deliberately brought in to be such. Anyway hello and my 2 questions are ' Can I post photos and if so how, are there any instructions?'  and secondly,  ' To what extent can I mention names in what I post, first names only, second names? only, both allowed where known? quoting or gist acceptable, do I need to even though its case and should be anyway, state it's a truthful and honest account?'  It's been ongoing for over a year now on something which I am guessing should get sorted in maybe a month for most people, and I would actually like to go into fuller details than I've even said to them because I feel its important you know that I HAVE been significantly hindered and am living under that still as I speak/type.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NO overdraft?


dnbdubs
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5254 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

im stuck for the last few months ive doing what everyone has and trying to reclaim bank charges, it would seem I went 2.84 o/d even though i dont have an overdraft and now owe 900 odd pounds, just because i was away, surley they cannot ass theese fees if i never had an o/d, also when it got to 300pounds I phoned up and agreed to make a payment plan which they agreed and said there would be no more charges from now and i could pay, the next day 152 pounds was added on and went from there, ive requested the telephone recording which this was said on, obviously stating data protection act blah blah blah, they are refusing to reply or give it to me i send all my letters recorded, so i have the reciepts and copies of theese letters, then a few days ago i got a letter from Trident Credit services (Natwest DCA) saying thankyou for setting up your £20 a month "6 month temporary agreement"....????????? any help ive sent like 20 letters ive had 2 replies i refuse to speak on the phone to Natwest. Obviously now i cant persue my refund of charges i was hoping i can use this recording against them to atleast get it back down to 300 pound or even the fact that i never even had an overdraft to get rid of it all.......:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who said you can't reclaim your charges? Someone on the tv perhaps? If so, they're wrong. There is plenty of information on the site about how to do this, but personally I would wait a few more days to let the dust settle a bit more.

 

Your post is a bit difficult to follow - some paragraph breaks would have been helpful, but £2.84 escalating to £900 is ridiculous. Do you have all your statements with details of the charges?

 

When you made a request for the telephone recording, did you make a formal request for information - a SAR - and did you send the £10 fee? When did you send it, and do you have confirmation it was received?

 

For now, just send Trident the 'account in dispute' letter and then ignore them. Unless Natwest have told you to pay them, don't, and it's up to you if you pay Natwest.

 

If you haven't already done so, now would be a very good time to move your account elsewhere.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry about paragraphs lol, yeah i just assumed the final ruling means i cannot go any further and i did have a look around and its seems like people are just figuring other ways around.

I have all the statements i have ever had, I made a formal request but did not send £10, I sent it 2 weeks ago. I checked with the post office and it has been recieved.

Ahhh forgot to add when I wrote to Natwest I told them to confirm Trident are allowed to collcet monies from myself, but the agreement also says that monies are to be

paid in branch over the counter? Im trying my best but im only 19 lol cant deal with theese sort of debts !!!!!

 

Originaly I offered to pay £84 pounds per month on the phone then obvously the charges kept coming after she said there wouldnt be any more and I made the woman confirm 3 times that there would be no more charges and all charges are included.....I never even had an overdraft surley they cannot persue this because its there fault for allowing it to go this way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you moved your account yet? If not, do it now, like today. Once your income is going elsewhere they can make as much noise as they like but they will no longer be able to help themselves.

 

Find the template letter for a SAR, adapt it to include a transcript of all telephone calls and the one where they agreed no more charges in particular, and send it off with £10 a.s.a.p.

 

For now, don't worry about who to pay, just get the above two things sorted. And stop worrying - it's only money. They can't put you in jail or kill you for it, so what's the worst that can happen? You get annoying letters (ask for help if you're not sure if/how to respond) and annoying phone calls (either don't answer the phone or refuse to go through security) and that's it.

The whole point of this site is to help whoever needs it. You're in the right place.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, yeah my income goes into my wallet now instead of theres lol (except they have done somthing now to my credit report to stop me getting another account in other banks!!) so i have a cash card account with hsbc :(

Ive now recieved a letter containing the word "sorry" on and sumones writing up a full report on the whole situation. soooo looks like theyve listened to the recording, I still need it so im going to send the Subject Access Request with the £10 incase they try and slither them selves around it. Appreciate all the help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good point, nunnyrose. Sorry I missed that one.

 

A straight case card account has the advantage that you (in theory) can't get in a mess again. Fingers crossed they do sort this out for you, but before you accept anything (even an apology!) let us know what they've written in case there's something else they should be doing, e.g amending your credit file.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i was over the age of 18 when i went overdrawn i am now 20 birthday the other week lol, ill keep posting updates as they come in like i say im just waiting for this woman to write up a report and see what the next step is, ive now sent the subject to access letter with the £10 via recorded delivery...

Link to post
Share on other sites

RESULT TODAY got a letter back from natwest appologising for everything awarding me everything back except £100 pounds to be paid within 14 days, and the default notice removed from my file...still no Telephone recording and they beat around the bush on all my complaints but im not that bovered if its gonna get rid of 800 - 900 od pounds

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...