Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
    • The King is the second monarch to appear on Bank of England notes which will be fed gradually into the system.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tesco just 1 of 14 Credit Cards Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5241 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have received 3 Default Sum Notices all for Late Payment Fees £12 during Nov/Dec/Jan.

 

No other Default Sums and No Default Notice as yet.

 

All 3 same as this one

 

TescoDefault1of2.jpg

 

TescoDefault2of2.jpg

Edited by steve2577

All my postings are Without Prejudice and as such can not be used in any Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those are not default notices. They are default charges.

 

To be honest, at the moment I would not bother with them (considering how much chaos you have with the banks re CCA agreement applications, dispute letters, proper default notices etc).

 

Once you sort your affairs then you can have a read on here (not my interested subject so cannot help you) and see how to send an SAR and apply to get them refunded.

 

But once again, my advise is to get your records sorted, get them into line and then move on. You went and challenged something like 14 cards at the same time. Now unless you sort the paperwork out it can overtake you.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree to put it mildly.

 

I asked this on the Tesco Thread but for the majority amd some have confirmed they dont have agreements to show me. Can they enforce yes or No?

 

If No whats the consequences apart from DCA's Telephone Calls Letters House Visits and a trashed Credit File.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steve

All my postings are Without Prejudice and as such can not be used in any Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree to put it mildly.

 

I asked this on the Tesco Thread but for the majority amd some have confirmed they dont have agreements to show me. Can they enforce yes or No? Legally no they cannot enforce (unless you find a dodgy Judge. Once again read Humblemans thread if you want to learn more). Will they try? Read my pm regarding what I love to do to DCA's.

 

If No whats the consequences apart from DCA's If it goes to a DCA then there are solutions as well. Telephone Calls There are solutions to stop telephone calls. Letters Comes in handy when that double soft tissue has run out :D:D:D House Visits Read the OFT Guidelines re home visits and a trashed Credit File.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steve

Already answered in the thread Steve v HFC. And you have just shown that you have not done much homework before you started challenging the banks did you? Seems you read a couple of posts, thought "Heck........ seems ok lets go for it" and decided to take "The nice lollipop out of the banks mouth and they will not cry and scream to have it back".

 

I would suggest you post so that members on here can take an idea of what is what. Then get advise. Split each problem and do NOT think they are all the same. And take notes of what is being told to you. Then when the time comes, it may either be a strike out or, if it goes to Court you should have enough information in your hands to be able to fight it, put a good argument forward and win.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nick

 

No didn't want to jump into this was going to carry on working and killing myself to keep afloat. But got made redundant aged 50 can find a decent job and thought might as well face the music now. I was told it was easier than it is turning out but I am also now mentally prepared to lose everything which has taken the actually worry out of the situation because it was this that stresses you out big time.

 

 

 

 

Thanks for your help today (oops yesterday mean)

All my postings are Without Prejudice and as such can not be used in any Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

But once again, my advise is to get your records sorted, get them into line and then move on. You went and challenged something like 14 cards at the same time. Now unless you sort the paperwork out it can overtake you.

 

Steve, Nick's quite right here. I have a similar number of issues to you. Spent a whole weekend at the beginning getting the paperqork in order and now takes up the majority of space in 3 cupboards!!!

 

But makes the whole thing so much easier to deal with. Buy a few of those box filing systems. If you get one that does go to court the volume of paperwork generated is huge!

 

M

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default Notice arrived just Now (26th Jan) dated 21st Jan (sent 1st Class Post) giving me 17 days from the date of this letter (no time to post at the moment).

All my postings are Without Prejudice and as such can not be used in any Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Default Notice arrived just Now (26th Jan) dated 21st Jan (sent 1st Class Post) giving me 17 days from the date of this letter (no time to post at the moment).
Keep the envolope if DN reeds 17 days from it is not in the prescibed form . The enforcment default and termination notices 1983 clearly state "the date being a date" lots of other things to look for to so post it up .
Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, they should put a "proper date". However, that is a de minimus issue and will probably not be relevant.

 

I would be inclined to mark on the envelope that you received it today.

 

Is the amount of arrears they are asking for correct. eg are there any late payment / over limit charges included in the figure. They can only ask for what is genuinely due. and charges arent.

 

Other than that, I dont see too much wrong with the DN. sorry :(

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, they should put a "proper date". However, that is a de minimus issue and will probably not be relevant.

 

I would be inclined to mark on the envelope that you received it today.

 

Is the amount of arrears they are asking for correct. eg are there any late payment / over limit charges included in the figure. They can only ask for what is genuinely due. and charges arent.

 

Other than that, I dont see too much wrong with the DN. sorry :(

Agree as the date is 21 Jan. It says 17 days starting from the next day after the date. That makes it 17 days starting from the 22nd.

 

To me even if posted and claimed it is second hand post it still gives 14 days. As citizenB said check the figures. That may make it invalid and faulty. Otherwise, 21 plus 4 days post makes it should have been delivered yesterday but 17 days to remedy (when should have 14) still allows for the one day delay in post.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, having given this a bit more thought, 21st was Thursday. Allow 4 WORKING DAYS for delivery from next day. So next day is 22nd (Friday). Plus 3 more days (starting from Monday) makes it delivery should be on 27th.

 

Might, just might, fall in as invalid due to not 14 clear days to remedy.

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, they should put a "proper date". However, that is a de minimus issue and will probably not be relevant.

 

I would be inclined to mark on the envelope that you received it today.

 

Is the amount of arrears they are asking for correct. eg are there any late payment / over limit charges included in the figure. They can only ask for what is genuinely due. and charges arent.

 

Other than that, I dont see too much wrong with the DN. sorry :(

 

 

Late payment fees of £12 in Nov Dec Jan all these included the final figure.

 

Are you saying these Late Payment Fees are not part of the total owed and therefore should not be part of the DN?

All my postings are Without Prejudice and as such can not be used in any Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Late payment fees of £12 in Nov Dec Jan all these included the final figure.

 

Are you saying these Late Payment Fees are not part of the total owed and therefore should not be part of the DN?

 

I believe that is correct Steve, the DN should only include your missed contractural payments - not additional charges.

 

M

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

See they also talk about PPI (Protection Payment Insurance) on the DN.

 

Have you got this? :D:D

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

See they also talk about PPI (Protection Payment Insurance) on the DN.

 

Have you got this? :D:D

 

 

Did not have any PPI on any card.

 

When I made my initial informal request on 29th Oct 2009 (without prejudice). I was told to make sure I stopped using any cards by a forum member. I checked and this was the only card I actually used on a day to day basis and noticed I had a subscription to Which Magazine which I wasn't aware of which I cancelled straight away so the final purchase on this card was 18th Nov 2009. I then made my official CCA request 23rd Nov (there was no other purchases on this card after the 18th Nov).

 

Sorry to omit this but this is the main card out of 14 that I actually used for any purchases all the other card were balance transfers every six months or so.

All my postings are Without Prejudice and as such can not be used in any Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is the main card out of 14 that I actually used for any purchases all the other card were balance transfers every six months or so.

Right. Now to show you how easily a person can make a mistake and that can be used against that person (which is why you have to THINK before you OPEN you gob).

 

Playing the Devils Advocate:

 

Question: You say that this was the card used for any purchases. All the other cards were balance transfers every six months or so. So if you take one card and you transfer that balance to another card, how come on the card that you transfered from you still owe money?

 

Now answer that question.

 

What you have to also understand is that a Judge will be evaluating how you reply and what you say. The honesty. The integrity. Shall he believe you or not.

 

And, actually this was told to me by my own solicitor..................

 

In Court they can throw a load of $hit at the ceiling and hope that some of it sticks. The idea is to simply discredit you. (Yep. My solicitor is very polite and uses words of choice :D:D:D).

If I have helped you or made you laugh by some witty remark and brightened your day................ the scales to click are over to your left hand side. :D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...