Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I made that payment on 13th Feb, then it all went to sh!t x
    • Massive potentially that payment has been made in some form as accompanying evidence to your financial difficulties.  And yes, but add some more zing to the email if it goes to the CEO - You need to make them understand what they have done. And telling the CEO  / MD of the biz what their actions have done to you - It adds to the complaint weighting.    
    • I have just found an email (and checked and verified it on my MCB account online) and I did make a payment to them, but then obvs didn't after that. Will that make any difference to my case? 
    • This is what I have said in my email of complaint:   On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I have found myself in financial difficulty and I contacted you on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months and I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name.  I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this.  What I would like you to do is to please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP. If you fail to resolve my complaint within 8 weeks, or if matters are not settled to my satisfaction, I will have no alternative but to refer my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully, Should I send something along those lines to the CEO? 
    • Right... Misuse of Facility is a Cat 6 and is considered the worst out of all of the CIFAS Categories for CIFAS Markers.  However lets see what happens when MCB come back to you. Make sure you refer it to the CEO.    IF YOU DONT HAVE A VALID REASON FOR THE ISSUE WITH PAYMENTS ETC - Then the marker will stay.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5258 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

I'm in the middle of trying to claim back excessive charges that Equita applied to some PCN's I had with them 3 years ago. Can anyone tell me if there is a time limit with regards to disputing these charges and trying to get a refund for any overcharging?

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks...that's interesting...

 

In recent correspondence from them they quote the 'Distress for Rent rules 1988' and basically say that any disputes about charges must be made within 12 months.

 

I'm a little bit lost as to what to do next. I seem to be constantly hitting my head against an Equita brick wall. Getting this far has taken 3 SAR's, numerous phonecalls and emails and 10 months so far.

 

Any advice on how to proceed would be much appreciated....

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not too clued up tbh but others should be able to tell you which charges are correct and which are not. Did they provide you with the SAR, they have to by law?

Don't fall for their rubbish. They will try and baffle you with B/S. You have six years.

Edited by PSB123
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they responded to my SAR and i have (what i believe) the evidence that i have been overcharged.

 

To give an idea of the overcharging, in a one month period i made 6 payments to Equita totalling just under £3000 on an original debt of £930 (6 x £155 PCN's). From their response to my SAR they claim to have visited my property 6 times (once for each PCN) but I have been charged more than once for the same visit, so their actual visits is probably more like 4. In each of these cases payments were made over the phone. At no point did i sign anything and they never gained entry.

 

I totally accept some of the charges they have applied, the letter fees and the charges for the visits they *did* make. However, I do object to the charges they claim as 'Attendance/Removal fees' which, despite numerous attempts, they have failed to break down and justify.

 

I appreciate your posts 'PSB123', can anyone else suggest next steps (maybe Form 4 complaint) that might help both of us reclaim these excessive charges.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

this may help you regarding visit fee charges

You will find the changes to the Statutory Regulations under SI 1857 of 2003.

 

The fees for vistits are actually quite simply to calculate as the regs provide for the visit to levy a being 28% of the debt.

 

Put simply assuming the PCN had increased to £150, you then apply the £5 TEC fee (£155) and then add to this the one Statutory Letter Fee of £11.20. Add VAT to the letter fee which is £1.96 (see note below). The total should be £168.16. This is the figure that needs to be multiplied by 28% to get the 1st visit fee.

 

PS: We are finding the bailiffs are continuing to charge VAT at the OLD RATE of 17.5% instead on the reduced amount of 15%. Be aware...

 

a baillif cant charge multipule charges for collecting more than 1 PCN at the same time so you have to find out from the council the date each pcn was passed to equita if you have been charged a visit fee for all pcn on the same day then you can claim them back

 

forumbox_right_tile.gifforumbox_bottom_left.gifforumbox_bottom_tile.gifforumbox_bottom_right.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks...that's interesting...

 

In recent correspondence from them they quote the 'Distress for Rent rules 1988' and basically say that any disputes about charges must be made within 12 months.

 

I'm a little bit lost as to what to do next. I seem to be constantly hitting my head against an Equita brick wall. Getting this far has taken 3 SAR's, numerous phonecalls and emails and 10 months so far.

 

Any advice on how to proceed would be much appreciated....

 

 

Can you ask them to confirm to which which precise part of the Distress for Rent rules are they relying upon !!!

 

You need to ENSURE that you request a copy of the screen shot of your account. This will CONFIRM in black and white what visits have actually been made.

 

A bailiff CANNOT apply multiple charges for enforcing more that one PCN at the same time. They can however charge individual letter fee of £11.20

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you ask them to confirm to which which precise part of the Distress for Rent rules are they relying upon !!!

 

You need to ENSURE that you request a copy of the screen shot of your account. This will CONFIRM in black and white what visits have actually been made.

 

A bailiff CANNOT apply multiple charges for enforcing more that one PCN at the same time. They can however charge individual letter fee of £11.20

Can they provide a screenshot for this even if the debt is several years old? Also should we ask them for a SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the screen shots from the account, giving their interpretation of a 'full and detailed breakdown' of the charges.

 

I have also sent letters asking them to either refund the money that i think has been overcharged or provide further details of the costs. They have refused to do either simply stating that ' Contrary to my letter, they dispute my allegations that i have been overcharged'. No, further breakdown, no explanation.....nothing.....

 

Maybe it is time to file a small claim...?

 

tomtubby, with regards to the 'Distress for rent rules' they were talking about getting the fees assessed, in which they appear to be correct. It doesn't stop me from pursuing this through other avenues though. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they responded to my SAR and i have (what i believe) the evidence that i have been overcharged.

 

To give an idea of the overcharging, in a one month period i made 6 payments to Equita totalling just under £3000 on an original debt of £930 (6 x £155 PCN's). From their response to my SAR they claim to have visited my property 6 times (once for each PCN) but I have been charged more than once for the same visit, so their actual visits is probably more like 4. In each of these cases payments were made over the phone. At no point did i sign anything and they never gained entry.

 

I totally accept some of the charges they have applied, the letter fees and the charges for the visits they *did* make. However, I do object to the charges they claim as 'Attendance/Removal fees' which, despite numerous attempts, they have failed to break down and justify.

 

I appreciate your posts 'PSB123', can anyone else suggest next steps (maybe Form 4 complaint) that might help both of us reclaim these excessive charges.?

 

I have just reread your post and it looks as if the bailiff have applied "multiple charges" to your account!!

 

Do you have the breakdown of charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I have a breakdown of the charges and yes they have applied multiple charges. They have charged me, and I have paid three lots of £55.21 for one visit. Amusingly, despite the fact that it's there in black and white on their screen shots, they fail to acknowledge this as an unfair charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Dont bother sending £10 to a bailiff, the law decides what the bailiffs charges should be.

 

This £10 things is a bailiffs money-[problem] and a delay tactic. They are pretending that asking for a breakdown of costs is accessing personal data as defined under the Data protection Act 1998.

  • Haha 1

The next generation Nintendo Wii - the Nintendo Puu

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've been overcharged by several bailiffs in the past too. I didn't realise I could reclaim. So given they ripped me off to the tune of £300, its worth a letter or two. So, do I need to pay a tenner for the SAR? Any advice would be very gratefully received. The thought of getting back at these bstds is great! They've made my life hell several times. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Layer cake, although some say not to pay the £10 for the Subject Access Request I have done and would recommend doing so because they then legally have to respond to you within 40 days. (Although, be warned, you probably wont get a reply within 40 days).

 

Also, be prepared to be patient.....it's a very slow and frustrating process...Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...