Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Few tweaks as the run order was completely messed up and the main point of your defence (reconstituted agreement) pushed to the bottom of the statement.   I, XXXXXX, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence in this claim and further to my set aside application dated 1 November 2022. 1.The claimants witness statement confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the drafts in person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act. 2.  I understand that the claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income as confirmed in the claimants witness statement exhibit by way of the Deed of Assignment. 3. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights.  This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information).  The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party. 4.  I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 5. The alleged letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address.  I have attached a copy of my tenancy agreement which is marked ‘Appendix 1’ and shows I was residing at a difference address as of 11 December 2018 and was therefore not at the service address at the time the proceedings were served.  I have also attached an email from my solicitors to the Claimants solicitors dated 14 July 2022 which was sent to them requesting that they disclose the trace of evidence they utilised prior to issuing the proceedings against me.  This is marked ‘Appendix 2’. The claimants solicitors did not provide me with these documents. 6. Under The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims 2017 a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior to and including ,The Pre action Protocol letter of claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claim form dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 7. Upon the discovery of the Judgement debt, I made immediate contact with the Court and the Claimant Solicitors, putting them on notice that I was making investigations in relation to the Judgement debt as it was not familiar to me.  I asked them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.   The correspondence to the Claimant Solicitor's is attached and marked ‘Appendix 3’ 8. On (insert date) I successfully made application to set a side the judgment. The claim proceeded to allocation, 9. The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2 February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None of these documents were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. (insert date you did receive the documents) I then sent a Data Subject Access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided. Details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 4’and the copies of correspondence between myself and Barclays are attached and marked ‘Appendix 5’. Remove irrelevant 10.The claimant relies upon and has exhibited a reconstituted version of the alleged agreement. It is again denied that I have ever entered into an agreement with Barclaycard on or around 2000.  It is admitted that I did hold other credit agreements with other creditors and as such should this be a debt that was assigned to Barclaycard from another brand therefore the reconstituted agreement disclosed is invalid being pre April 2007 and not legally enforceable pursuant to HHJ Judge Waksman in Carey v HSBC 2009 EWHC3417.  Details of this are attached and marked ‘Appendix 6’. The original credit agreement must be provided along with any reconstituted version on a modified credit agreement and must contain the names and address of debtor and creditor, agreement number and cancelation clause. 11. Therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to disclose a true executed legible agreement on which its claim relies upon and not mislead the court. 12. It is denied I have ever received a default Notice pursuant to sec 87(1) CCA1974.The claimant is put to strict proof to evidence from the original creditors internal document software the trigger of said notice.  13.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. 14. Until such time the claimant can comply and disclose a true executed copy of the original assigned agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. Signed                 ………………………………………………….. Name                  XXXX Date                     30 April 2024   Run 3 copies Court /Claimants Sol/File
    • As one of you mentioned above I've been in a mess for nearly 20 years now and I'm ready to sort my credit report out now - the main reason I got into second round of debt is my kids being unwell and the state considering them not unwell enough for extra help so despite my son being in hospital for 3 months in one year we got extra zero help and I eventually lost my job and got into debt to just so I can be تا my sons hospital bed at his time of need - my life basically fell apart and all these debts got me again 
    • Gosh mate I've woke up this morning with half the worry I had last night when going to sleep!.  I can't believe how much this forum has helped me over the years and I don't  have the words to explain the gratitude I feel towards you guys -  Now that I've slept on it I feel ready to reject this company and my plan is to make them an offer to accept payments to date as full and final settlement - I will I think write them a letter once my review is completed or maybe just send it now whilst they are reviewing explaining my kids are unwell for which reason I'm struggling to survive and if I can politely request for them to accept payment to date as a full and final - I'll mention I don't have any cash or anyone to borrow from to offer a full or even part amount of the remaining balance of the iva and therfore am unable to make a offer of payment.   If they agree to at least even put my offer to the creditors then I feel it's better I hang in there and that way I won't have to deal with any possibilities of more defaults and ccjs    Right now the only adverse effects on my credit report are the iva that is now 3 years old and 2 Ccj one coming of this July and one thus October.    But I am worried new action will begin and new defaults and Ccj may start to appear because I've paying into an agreement im under the impression the 6 year rules starts again so yes I have lost of mixed feelings about this but I'm not going to lie you guys have put some life back into my breath this week as for the last 3 years I've felt caged like an animal and this morning I feel freer I can't explain how much but certainly my soul feel lighter today thanks to yin because I'm now viewing this review totally different to I do yesterday thanks to you guys 
    • Court name UNKNOWN Case number ********** Amount N/A Confirmed by Insolvency Service Date issued May 2021 Type Voluntary Arrangement Notes If you have questions about voluntary arrangements you should speak to the Insolvency Service.     I started this in 2021. So it's been about 3 years I've been paying. 
    • Thanks @lookinforinfo@Nicky Boyi sent across the agreement earlier in this thread. No mention of financial reward to the MA. But, I wouldn't be surprised if it was done on the sly. As I said earlier, the owner of OPS is a convicted criminal, with a very shady reputation around these parts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mortgage Express appoint LPA Recievers Walker Singleton to scare tenants off!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4054 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had anyone had any advice from FSA or solicitors on the matter of overpayments made? ie where the monies paid over by receivers are in excess of the monthly payment? we've been told this is added to capital (so doesnt help with the next months payment)...but does not actually reduce your capital....so in effect you are continuing to pay interest on monies already held by ME....cant see how this one is legal even under the act!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

What they do is class is towards your next month payment, but if it still continues to pile up more than the monthly payment it goes into credit on payments and they class it as paying towards paying the mortgage.

 

I have the same situation and wonder that surely the surplus should be coming back to me but because they are recievership not classed as ours but theirs. On other words it is still in our names but nothing to do with us, they can screw us and pile loads od debts towards it and do whatever they like with it however it is us they will come after once they sell for a huge loss. totally wrong in my eyes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi chill...the problem is that when it goes onto the mortgage it just kind of sits there (ie doesnt get reflected in the monthly payment)...i think anyway but they are not very clear on it. how are you getting on with your case (pm if you prefer), as sounds like we are kind of in same situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

see below what price waterhouse receivers say about their actions in the sale of B&B ,very intresting fact about the intrest ,

persicuted the best option available to you is not to leave this going on for much longer you seriously need to enter a court action under section N244 this is a matter oof urgency otherwise all your monies will disapear in what seems to be ficticional chrges ,you have to do this for you and if you have famillly for their sake otherwise you will be stripped of all assets you own including your own property ,kids out in street etc. i cannot put it any planer than that

patrickq1

 

18. What is insolvency?

Insolvency is a lack of financial resources, such that a business is unable to meet its ongoing commitments. When insolvent, an administrator is appointed by the Courts to manage the company's affairs, business and property for the benefit of its creditors (the people or other businesses to whom it owes money).

The objective of an administrator is: to rescue the company so that it can continue to operate; to achieve a better price for the company's assets or otherwise realise value more favourably than if the company were wound up; or to realise the value of property to make a distribution to one or more preferential creditors.

19. If Bradford and Bingley had gone into administration, what value would that have delivered for shareholders?

Shareholders would have received value only if there was an amount left over after B&B's creditors had been paid in full.

During an administration, interest payment on debts is suspended. In the event that there was a surplus after creditors had been repaid their principal, the administrator must allocate this in proportion to cover missed interest up to a level calculated by reference to a defined interest rate.

As part of my considerations, I have determined that the surplus amount outstanding would not have been sufficient to meet the interest that would have accrued to creditors and, as a result, no residual would be available to make a distribution to shareholders

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the N244 i would nt be wasting another minit on this ,you also need to instruct a Solicitor to enter a CPR 31.14 this will be a specific request as to all payments collected and received by the receiver all payments made to MX all balances that are held and also the full schedule of tennents payments who and whome , a full and complete lists including costs and invoices for all maintainance work carried out on your behalf ,this you can then check up with tennents to search for any annomilies ,i think you will find that their may have been a mistake as in deceptive practices then you can charge MX for their assistance in the Possibility of Fraud that may have been carried out by there appointed receivers

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you probably wont find any successes ,simply put because this situation is ongoing most BTL think that it may blow over, after twelve months you can and shoild do as i said above CPR31.14 and issue a N244 ,let a judge decide we all know that the receiver will obviscate as well will MX but the issue to both parties the CPR will give you a sense of what is going on behind your back, if they cannot answer any details you have asked for then the N244 will come in handy for you can ask and it will be granted a judge will ask them or instruct them both to comply with this issue they refuse to answer to , i suspect strongly the maintanence and invoices will snag them and will leave a very substantial amount of more questions they can either come clean or dig a deeper hole and if they do that then its a matter for the Police to investigate any potential frauds , MX wont like it and certainly do not want to be tied down to legal matters such as an investigation into their part ,

so the issue of the CPR is important then the issue of the N244 ,you must never allow more than twelve months ,any longer is questionable and would promote a very unfair relationship this is where the spineless FSA should step in they have issued warnings concerning the BTL's and most \mortgage Co are very much aware it is being put under the Spotlight with the treasury select committee ...so start fighting there war make it personal you have absolutely nothing to loose ,if they sell way below market value then this is also very questionable

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

we've got a good while before twelve months is up. gosh i hope this doesnt drag on til then but keen to help bring this nonsence to an end whether we win our case or not! either that or i'm selling my soul, becoming a receiver and earning back my livelihood!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it is a very lucrative business isnt it ,sadly at others expense ,and its also a very immoral business that should be either stopped completely or should have goverment guidelines ie in court action and not without at least this way you can fight your corner,yes you are in a good position PER and this will be more than a nail in the coffins of all receivers so expect a fight but you have a case to answer ie they will find it difficult to follow through with the cpr request in full so the solicitor or whoever draws up the CPR must emphasise the request is for every question asked to be answered in full ,i think what may happen is they will pass it back to MX or whoever but this alone is a result because it does not let them of the hook it will only expose this abuse even more

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello all

i put on here you need to issue a N244 mistakenly ,Caro (bright Spark) lol has pointed out it may have to be an N1 ,but you will need to seek clarification on this from a solicitor

i have also found that you have been put under a Novation of your contract ,which in effect has rendered your mortgage contract suspect for the power of Attorney is a seperate contract and you will find it is not on the mortgage documents themselves but seperate making the mortgage contract subject to a navation order ,in otherwords you should read this below and put this to your solicitor that the power of attorney does release you from the Mortgage Contract by the appointment of a third party to take over your mortgage ...

NOVATION

 

Novation is a substitution of a new for an old debt. The old debt is extinguished by the new one contracted in its stead; a novation may be made in three different ways which form three distinct kinds of novations.

The first takes place without the intervention of any new person, where a debtor contracts a new engagement with his creditor, in consideration of being liberated from the former. This kind has no appropriate name and is called a novation generally.

The second is that which takes place by the intervention of a new debtor, where another person becomes a debtor instead of a former debtor, and is accepted by the creditor, who thereupon discharges the first debtor. The person thus rendering himself debtor for another, who is in consequence discharged, is called expromissor; and this kind of novation is caned expromissio.

The third kind of novation takes place by the intervention of a new creditor where a debtor, for the purpose of being discharged from his original creditor, by order of that creditor, contracts some obligation in favor of a new creditor. There is also a particular kind of novation called a delegation.

It is a settled principle of the common law, that a mere agreement to substitute any other thing in lieu of the original obligation is void unless actually carried into execution and accepted as satisfaction. No action can be maintained upon the new agreement, nor can the agreement be pleaded as a bar to the original demand. But where an agreement is entered into by deed, that deed gives, in itself, a substantive cause of action and the giving such deed may be sufficient accord and satisfaction for a simple contract debt.

The general rule seems to be that if one indebted to another by simple contract, give his creditor a promissory note, drawn by himself for the same sum, without any new consideration, the new note shall not be deemed a satisfaction of the original debt unless so intended and accepted by the creditor. But if he transfer the note he cannot sue on the original contract as long as the note is out of his possession.

NOVATION AGREEMENT

 

A legal instrument executed by (a) the contractor (transferor), (b) the successor in interest (transferee), and © the by which, among other things, the transferor guarantees performance of the contract, the transferee assumes all obligations under the contract, and the purchaser recognizes the transfer of the contract and related assets

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folk,

 

I have read on here that the "Power of Attorney" should be a separate document attached to the overall mortgage paperwork (Deed & T&C). Again, after sending SARS and using CPR rules of engagement letter, there is no document covering the specific PoA. The only reference to it is in the Terms & Conditions.

 

Is there an actual directive/statute we can rely on in court, to further say:-

"look judgy, the paperwork does not have PoA documents, so invalid according to etc etc rules"

 

We have no more money for solicitors..have already used three and one barrister (who was not very helpful)

 

Many thanks all for any clarity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the power of atorney is a seperate contract with its own terms and conditions it cannot be entered into a mortgage deed document, if it was then this cannot make it valid as you have not signed this mortgage deed knowingly with a second contract in it , so under CPR rules of engagement CPR31.14 you need to ask for this specific document if they do not have it then they must withdraw their actions of putting your properties into receivers hands ie third party rules when their is no signed agreement ,in effect they have breached the mortgage contract and any losses can be claimed against both parties

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Charles,

 

Emptied my inbox now.

 

PoA, in the actual terms and conditions it says PoA cannot be removed whilst in debt so they are covered on that and we cannot ge thits removed. I believe it is irrelevant on the basis of PoA because of this term alone in the Ts and Cs. Now whether the Ts and Cs is valid because it is based for residential mortgages and not for BTL is another question altogether.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many Thanks to everybody on this forum and those who also additionallly helped via "Private Messages"

 

I have replied to all the PM's, please check ur inboxs.

 

D-Day is fast approaching...and phoned court today to ask why they have not sent official confirmation paperwork of court time/date.

 

They said something eerily strange...."Your N244 form simply means you want a hearing but since LPA are your agent, we deal with them on your behalf, they have the notice to appeaar"

 

We were furious and said the point is we are disputing the LPA's interference in our business and tenants well being. She then said "well just turn up also, your name is on the form."

 

I think she must have been at the xmas brandy too early. f***kin Hell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep at it Charli boy ,good things come to those who wait , so to speak, ive finnished your 244 you need to just dress it up a bit, but keep personal feeling out of it ,other that that it looks good ...

patrickq1

hope everyone has a quiet and restfull xmas at least it is trouble free for a few days huh...also lets hope for a better new year

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4054 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...