Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord has unfairly....


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5280 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bit of a technical one but here we go. Forgive me for missing certain items as i am still flustered about the whole situation.

 

 

My mum moved into a house about 5 years or so ago. Paid quite a large deposit of around £2000. She moved out less than a month ago now.

 

 

I am furious with the landlord, but he won't speak to me. And my mum is too scared to contact him about this.

 

 

From browsing around the forums, from what it seems, he has done everything by the book, took an inventory of everything and sent a letter recently to her new address, with a list of more than 50 items that are either missing, or damaged. Small things like, 1 single curtain hook missing... £12.

 

 

90% of what he has listed is well overpriced. He has completely disregarded normal wear and tear and the depreciation in the value of certain items, like the used fridge that was there when she arrived, which is at least 7 or more years old, which does not work anymore. Other things like the carpets needing cleaning and a tree we had to cut down as it was destroying the neighbors wall, which he gave permission, and paid for to remove!!!!!

 

 

She paid the deposit well before the deposit scheme of April 2007 so it does not look like she will be covered there. She has renewed the lease several times, details of which i don't know. He did increase the price a couple of times however.

 

 

Not once did he offer to come and replace dead furniture or even paint the walls.

 

 

There is a tiny hole in the wall and my dad put a foot through the ceiling of one of the bedrooms so granted that will be a maximum of £300 to fix... maximum!

 

 

I really don't know where she stands by more than half of the deposit has been taken.

 

 

I probably will have to go back and get some details filled in about this for you guys but this is all i have right now!

 

 

Desperate for some advice!

 

 

Thanks for your time!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please can you find out the dates when the tenancy was renewed? Also, what was the monthly rental?

 

If the tenancy has been renewed since April 2007 then the Tenancy Deposit Scheme should take effect.

 

Without wishing to be too personal why was the hole-y ceiling not repaired / carpets not cleaned prior to your parents moving out? Also, 50 items seems a lot...

 

It sounds like matters, such as the tree/wall, were well known about, so hopefully you won't mind me asking about this too.

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The full inventory list along with the list i will get in an email tomorrow.

 

 

Everything was properly cleaned before she left. Bearing in mind, there was 5 of us living in this house for 5 years. Like i said before, the carpet is, and seems to always be the main problem, its a 2 floor house with 4 bedrooms and a big sitting room, in other words, a lot of carpet. 2 kids and 3 adults, a lot of feet. Wear & tear i say. It's been cleaned and he will not get any cleaner. A steam cleaner was hired for 2 days and everything was spotless. She's not a woman that tolerates mess, trust me! Everything was done by the book, and unfortunately thats where she is getting stung, vulnerability.

 

 

The main reason why the ceiling was not done, is because the landlord is selling the house and its up in the local agency for min asking price of £750,000. The house is in a poor condition as it is and needs a lot of work, a small hole in the ceiling is minor compared to the renovation cost to the property, and whoever purchases the property is bound to restore it. It just seems like a greedy landlord to be honest. Above the ceiling is a loft, its not a gaping hole, its more of a dent where the plaster has cracked and collapsed. Not even 20 cm wide. That may be worth pointing out.

 

 

The tree was discussed, but he is not happy that it had to be cut down and wants it replacing as he feels even though he agreed to it, it only benefited our neighbors and apparently wants a new one replacing. A tree of its same size is going to cost quite a bit. But i don't really think there is much justification in that if he agreed initially. But there is nothing to prove it and the since then neighbors have sold up and gone.

 

 

The tenancy was formally renewed at some point in August so yes it would be covered, even so, he had the deposit in a scheme as soon as she signed the agreement. So all's in order there. However, he is defiantly profiteering and i just can't under stand what (the official amount confirmed) £2218 is compared to the £750,000 min the guy is going to make? It's not going to be rented out again so what's the need in freshening up the carpet?

 

 

I was reading through the LBA template, and i advised her to sort of go along with the general tone of the letter informally first and see what his reaction is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this, helps put matters in some context.

 

So, he produced an inventory when your mum moved in. Now, he is relying on that, whilst not intending to return her deposit (? she paid @£2000 when she move in and his total comes to £2218 ?)

 

Sounds very frustrating at the moment. Let's see the inventory list and see what can be done about it ;)

 

A few thoughts occur to me. Things like the ceiling could be problematical. Is it an older house, say, with a lathe and plaster ceiling? Once an area of plaster is shot, well, you see what the landlord may be concerned about as well.

 

I know it doesn't help matters now, but years ago a young family (who had been good tenants) moved out and although they left the place relatively clean and tidy they 'swopped' items, such as the new LeCreuset cookware for really cheap and nasty stuff.

 

Not only was LeCreuset shown in the original inventory, but they left the price stickers on the new, cheap-o stuff. They were then unhappy that I made a reasonable deduction from their deposit :rolleyes:

 

''Your" landlord does not sound quite so, er, reasonable though. Let's see what he has to say for himself in the inventory!

 

What he's going to possibly make on the sale should not have any bearing on this, really. Again, I know it may not be quite what you want/need to hear at the moment, but let's get his list and see what can be done to help.

 

Will sign back on later tomorrow.

 

(Edit:

(Just realised I may have made an implication about swopping stuff/inventories that was not intended! Sorry!)

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope you get this sorted out - will leave it to more knowledgeable people to help you out, I know it's incredibly infuriating (the same thing happened to my mum, about 15 years ago, they completely took advantage of her naivety, and I will still exact revenge on that greedy estate agent if I ever get a chance;)). It's been occurring to me that it's the tenants who ought to have the right to a reference about the landlord!

 

But at least the law has improved in recent years - good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

surely if the fridge was there when you moved in, then it's the LL's responsibility to fix it or replace it..?

 

He agreed re the tree, so I don't think he can suddenly change his mind. Does he mention that it was agreed at all..?

 

Re the hole in the ceiling, that's one thing that you/mum should have fixed - it's damage. It doesn't matter what will happen with the house after the tenant leaves because that's the LL's business and he has the right to expect damages to be paid for.

 

 

...and shouldn't your mum be afforded the opportunity to 'make good'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...