Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
    • I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version. I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version. I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version.
    • Thank you Dave for jumping in yesterday and advising not to send off the letter I wrote. I am sorry Clou but I thought at the time that both car parks were owned by Alliance. Before doing a snotty letter does anyone in your family able to alos drive your car apart from yourself and are you the keeper?
    • Thanks for this. UPS never said they delivered to the wrong address. Tracking just showed as delivered. EBay couldn’t find it for weeks and then said they found it and it had chocolate in it. Something clearly doesn’t add up here.
    • Try to think things through logically & legally - the two go together as the civil court system in England is pretty decent and easy to get your head round. 1.  Say you & I got into legal dispute.  Who could sue who?  Well I could sue you and you could sue me.  My next-door neighbour couldn't sue you and your best mate couldn't sue me because the case would have nowt to do with them.  The same goes for a DCA.  It's not their debt.  They can do nothing. 2.  Of course a DCA can't affect your credit score.  If they could, then there would be nothing stopping you picking on someone you dislike, saying they owed you a billion pounds, and affecting their credit score.  Logically there must be more to it than some daft allegation.  CCJs are issued and credit scores wrecked after a judge has decided on the matter and the losing party has still refused to pay.  With nine grand in play the matter will not magically go away but you need to gen up and seperate daft threats from paper tigers from concrete threats which could really cause you trouble. The others are right - you need to inform the original creditor of your address in order to avoid a backdoor CCJ. Also, why did you decide not to sue UPS who have admitted to delivering to the wrong address which in turn led to the theft of your goods?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Link claimform - First National GEHL double glazing loan **WON - WRITTEN OFF BY GE**


beachcomber60
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4716 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the reply 42man,

 

Agreement is dated November 2004

 

Well I sent off my cca request & received their response today. It isn't worth scanning & posting it to my thread as it is virtually unreadable, its a very poor copy of a fax, apart from the hand writing of the salesman the actual agreement & T&C's are impossible to read.

 

In their covering letter they have asked for our telephone number so they can stay in touch with their customers :eek: ( think I was born yesterday ! !:grin:)

 

Beachy

 

Having received a cca is there a specific letter to send them disputing the account due to cca being TOTALLY unreadable (it appears to be a faxed copy).

 

beachcomber60 said:
Having received a cca is there a specific letter to send them disputing the account due to cca being TOTALLY unreadable (it appears to be a faxed copy).

 

:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 322
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So OK, after you've stopped laughing - is this enforceable? :eek::D

 

The actual agreement is the same quality - if I blanked out my personal details there would be nothing readable at all.

 

12 +2 days are up on Wednesday, should I wait until after that day so that it falls into dispute?

 

GEdglaz.jpg

 

 

Thanks muchly

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42man,

 

What I posted up was the T&C's, the actual cca they sent is far far worse than the t&c's - the only readable parts is name address & loan amount interest, ppi (grrr! Added to loan - even though I was self employed) & our signatures.

 

Have asked for the cca as part of the SAR.

 

Think its a multi part agreement as PT has described elsewhere, so would like to think its improperly executed ( if I could only understand it.

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Following a dispute letter I have now received a better copy of the agreement if someone more knowledgeable could check it out for me & OH.

 

Also received is our SAR, lots of stuff missing ie letters I've sent them & ones that they have sent us.

 

Also by the same post was a Default Notice (will scan up later if needed), what is very very worrying is that just before we ran into problems we got it down to £6k now its up to £8k and growing so all sorts of charges & additional interest is being added daily, also the T&C's states that they will continue to add interest even if the get a CCJ against us.

 

Looking for anything that can be used to dispute it further or render it unenforceable.

 

This could be the 'straw that breaks the camels back'.

 

FN1.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

And T&C's

 

FN2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

The agreement and the DN looks ok to me, can't see anything wrong and the DN has the right dates and format. As above it clearly states that 1st applicant was self employed would have a claim for the PPI.

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ida,

I was afraid of that :(

 

When you say 1st applicant ppi you mean mis selling, not only that but we were put under immence pressure by the salesman to take ppi and made a point of stating that both applicants would be covered (which we now know was very wrong).

 

The other thing that is very worring is that they dont state what charges they can add to the account, other then what they like when they like (even with a ccj) they have already charged each of us for not telling them we had moved, we did, along with a letter informing them of our financial problems, but never acknowledged (this was preCAG membership & never know the importance of recorded delivery).

 

OH is worried that the debt is growing at an alarming rate & they'll try & take our house.

 

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have a clear case of PPI missell. certainly any charges i.e the address could be tried to reclaim back (not to up on reclaims as mines was paid out relativley easy). remeber as well I beleive you can claim the interst on the PPI as well.

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've asked for someone to have a wandeer in to check to see if I have maybe missed something

 

 

Idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid the CCA & the DN looks o.k so you'll have to concentrate now on reclaiming the PPI. They said that they weren't regulated at the time, if that was the case they had no right selling PPI anyway. :rolleyes:

 

If they carry on refusing to repay it + interest it would be worth complaining to the Trading Standards & the OFT & sending GE a LBA (letter before action).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ida , Cerberusalert,

 

Many thanks for your help, looks like I've got a major battle on my hands with the ppi.

 

They seem to have covered their tracks pretty good as to what charges they added, I assume that if I can find out exactly what chargrs & fees they added it can be reclaimed?

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if this is any help.(I'm a newbie). I telphoned GE Money to request back statements, and within a week they had sent all my statements free of charge,( three copies arrived for some reason) clearly showing PPI element of loan. PPI was all rolled into the loan over five years, but the breakdown clearly showed the loan and PPI element seperately. Might be worth a try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Urgent help with this lot, they seem to have a licence to print money! !

 

Just to recap, leaving the ppi issue aside, we wrote to them almost two years ago with our change of address, got no response then June '08 plunged into financial difficulties following the company OH worked for full time & I under a sub contractor, went into receivership - we lost a huge amount of money.

 

we wrote to all our creditors, although some helped and others proved to be a pain in the backside, this creditor failed to acknowledge our letter & NDL budget planner also.

 

We couldn't keep up the payments so in order to stop the bank bouncing the DD and charging us £35 a throw we cancelled the DD, all the time not hearing a dickie bird from GE.

 

All of a sudden they appeared a few months ago writing to inform us that they had 'employed' lowells to 'trace us' and that they had 'fined' each of us £50 for not telling them we had moved and that interest would be added to that charge until such time it is paid, the agreement is in joint names.

 

I sent of a letter of complaint regarding correspondence that they had ignored, they responded with a default notice to each of us.

 

Today we have received two letters each 1) as we have not paid the arrears within the default notice timescale we have 7 days before the whole balance will become due on demand and a fee of £25 (each)for 'preparation & service' which has been added to the account. Letter 2) was inform us that a default fee of £60 (each) has been levied to the account.

 

So that has added up to £270 which has been added to the account.

 

I have SAR which did not contain all the information which was requested, I have sent a letter of non compliance and seperately copies of the letters relating to our move & job loss + complaint regarding misselling PPI which they have ignored.

 

When we lost our jobs the balance was just over £5k, its is now close to £9k - surely this is not right?

 

This combined with my other major problem is seriously damaging our health.

 

We just dont know what to do as they are demanding £2,100 within seven days or if we fail they want the full balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they've sent you another default notice? If so can you post it up.

 

 

Sorry, Son in law borrowed scanner, just got it back

 

GEDGdn3.jpg

 

And seconde letter received same day :-

 

GEDGdn2.jpg

 

At a complete loss as to which way to turn with them, They have totally ignored our letters and seem to be adding charges & fees at will and twice due to it being a joint agreement.

 

I have also launched a PPI complaint, we were told a complete pack of lies by the salesman, this complaint has also fallen on deaf ears.

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's extremely nice of them.....they've issued you with a defective default notice. The statutary requirement is that they must allow you 14 days from date of service to remedy the default. As soon as they terminate your a/c and demand full payment they will have unlawfully rescinded the agreement & will only be able to claim the arrears not the full balance.

 

Keep that notice safe with its envelope & do not let on to GE. ;)

 

 

Thanks for your quick reply, the DN is in post #16, can I ask, so I can understand things better, how is it defective?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still looking for a line of attack, playing round with figures yesterday there variable APR seems to be 84.9% which explains why the debt has doubled in 12 months.

 

Can we claim back:-

 

default charges £60

Service fee £25

Tracing fee £50 (even tho we wrote with a change of address - their not happy that we wont give them our new tele number.)

 

Each time they make a charge/penalty its doulbe the above as its in joint names.

 

They still do not reply to any letters (started Oct. '07).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...