Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you have the SIM, use it to text PAC to 65075 …… rather than calling SKY
    • Hi All I know this a long shot but ha anyone got any advice please? Nearly three years ago (maybe more) my ex took a contract out for a new phone for my birthday that I ended up paying the bills on (lovely present huh) I have always paid the bill for this. The phone number that I have had for most of my adult life was passed over to this contract and I am old now haha We are now divorced and have not been in contact  - he is abusive and I have nothing to do with him. I cannot enter into any dialogue with him whatsoever. I have continued with my phone contract and number etc but am stuck - I have no access to my bills even though they come out of my account - as the contract is in his name I cannot get a pac code to move therefore I will lose my number if I cancel- sky just quote data protection at me which I get but this is soooo frustrating!!!! I know that the sensible thing would have been to just l cancel the dd lose the number get another contract elsewhere and get over myself and move on but I am just asking out there as a final desperate attempt - can anything whatsoever be done??? Thank you in advance :)
    • What's your intent, or interest? I can't see that you have any cause of action regarding bills issued by one third party to another third party. Is the idea to use this as a lever "I'll denounce you to HMRC unless you do blah blah .." That might in fact have no teeth anyway, HMRC will aware of the company's turnover via their other tax affairs.  As a matter of fact a company buying VAT rated supplies and selling to VAT registered customers is actually worse off if not VAT registered themselves. Has your court case reached it's conclusion yet?
    • Hello, welcome to CAG.  I expect people will be along to advise later. We aren't here to mock, this is a serious forum. If you feel you're being picked on  report the relevant post to the site team.  Best, HB
    • no that is not a defence. because you don't have a photo
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Getting worried Re. Parking Charge!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5352 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys, Just thought i'd another story to the thread as i'm a little worried about the outcome.

 

I parked in my University car park, did nothing wrong except park at the side of an end parking bay so i wasn't actually in a bay. Now i didn'd see the notice saying not to as its a Uni car park i didnt think they would be that strict!

 

Anyway i returned after my day to find a "Notict to pay parking Charge" on my windscreen. Now i realise the carpark is operated by "Maxim Parking services" so technicly nothing to do with the Uni. A private firm.

 

I followed the advice far far back in this thread and replied to this charge with a letter saying:

 

"As the registered keeper of this vehicle, I have no obligation to inform you of the identity of the driver at the time. As the registered keeper of this vehicle i cannot be held liable as any alleged contract can only be formed with the driver.

Any further communication with be regarded as harrassment..........."

 

They have since replied with a letter saying that the signs around the campus clearly state that by parking on the campus the OWNER of the vehicle is contractually agreeing to pay any penalty's issued if they do not abide by the T&C's of the car park.

 

Now what do i do!? I'm getting a bit worried now! :sad:HELP ME :sad:

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chippy, I'm guessing your a student?

 

I can help with this one as I too have had dealings with Maxim Security Services. What you have been issued with is a private parking invoice which has no basis in law, very much unlike a Local Authority PCN or a Police FPN.

 

There are numerous legal defences to such a charge - unclear signage, excessive charge, not declaring who the driver was (as you have already mentioned).

 

Also, does your letter actually state "penalty"? A penalty is unlawful in common law, only the authorities or organisations contracted on behalf of the authorities can issue a penalty.

 

Anyway, how do they know you have contractually agreed if you weren't the driver. You have to know who you are contracting with before you enter in to a contract!

 

Relax, these clowns cannot do anything. They are far from the brightest stars in the sky lol.

 

If they do try to take any legal action (extremely unlikely) there are enough people on here to help you put together a cast iron defence.

 

All the best,

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freedom Trail,

 

Thanks for your advice!

 

I am a student, yes.

Can i ask what your experience of Maxim Parking Services is?]

 

The actual 'ticket', has the words "Notice to pay parking charge" and the response letter to my appeal has the word "Penalty" in it.

 

 

What step do you think i should take next? Or NO action, ignore?

 

 

 

Many Thanks!,

 

Chippy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chippy,

I am a fellow student (well, technically not as I have just graduated but you know what I mean).

 

I went to uni in Bournemouth; however, I undertook an industrial placement year working for a company in Reading. Whilst working in Reading, a friend and I used to park daily at Thames Valley University car park, despite not being allowed to. After about six months we each got an invoice for £70, reduced to £35 if paid within 14 days. We both paid the £35 and that was that. Morally, we deserved it, we had saved well over £1000 by not having to pay for parking in the local NCP so fair cop.

 

That said, after learning about the world of PPC's I decided to appeal the charge this year. Maxim told me that they will give me a full refund as soon as I provide proof of payment - this has now been sent to them.

 

To be fair, I tangled them up in knots really. The correspondence I received from them was terrible, the formatting, the spelling, the grammar, everything. This is why I say that they are not very bright.

My advice to you is don’t be a mug like me and pay it. As someone who has sued an organisation in the County Court, I can tell you that it would cost them at least £55 in court fees, before you even had your case heard. I dare say this is getting on for the amount of your fine. Add to this, they would also incur their own admin costs for preparing the claim. Finally, they have very very little chance of winning which means the risk simply isn't worth taking for them.

These companies trot out County Court threats everyday; however, I for one can say that it is a long process. It simply isn't a viable business model for a private parking company to take to court every individual that doesn't pay.

What will happen is that you will get a couple of letters from Maxim. You will then get a couple of three more from their debt collector's (this is often just another desk in the same office). Finally, you will receive another couple of letters from their solicitor's (again, usually just another desk in the same office). After this, all will go away.[/font]

My advice is fully ignore! Court Cases are rare; however, it is widely thought that those most likely to be taken to court are those that respond to PPC's. Respondents get placed on a suckers list - the reason being is that they obviously buy in to the legitimacy of the whole PPC [problem] to write and appeal in the first instance.

Best Regards,

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore it totally

its a [problem]

 

there is nothing they can do to you.

 

just do a bit of reading in this forum

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore it totally

its a [problem]

 

there is nothing they can do to you.

 

just do a bit of reading in this forum

 

dx

 

Wise words

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well your input is very helpfull chaps! Thanks for that.

 

I guess ignorance is the way to go it seems, if the whole lot does end up going to court. Do i have a leg to stand on if they try and sue me for hundreds?

 

Many Thanks Again!

 

Chippy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

none have ever

its an invoice NOT a parking ticket issue by the council or police

the only ones you need to pay are:

penalty charge notices.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess ignorance is the way to go it seems, if the whole lot does end up going to court. Do i have a leg to stand on if they try and sue me for hundreds?

More legs than Jake the Peg. :D Try reading a few threads around this forum.

 

They have a job just to get you to court. Have a read of this: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/parking-traffic-offences/164651-problems-ppcs-face.html

 

If they actually get you to court then this guide would be a starting point for any defense: FAQs - Private Parking Companies/Charges (everything you need to know)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cant!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignorance is what they rely on as most people are honest and immediately think they have done something wrong and reach for the chequebook

 

From my own experience you will receive 3 or maybe 4 from the parking company with lots of red ink followed by 1 from the Debt Collectors who will threaten that if they have not heard within seven days it will be passed to the solicitors for possible court action. These will also write probably 2 letters before they give up and look for an easier target

 

Ignore and do not get into any communication with them as they will just up the [problem] mails as by acknowledging they exist they will assume there is a possibility they can mug you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well your input is very helpfull chaps! Thanks for that.

 

I guess ignorance is the way to go it seems, if the whole lot does end up going to court.

I don't think that will happen somehow.

 

Do i have a leg to stand on if they try and sue me for hundreds?

They can only sue for the true cost incurred - 50p maybe. If you sue someone, it is about recovering loss or money you are entitled to, not a profit making venture. They can sue for what they like, what is awarded is up to the Judge. You have 1 more leg to stand on than the PPC.

 

Many Thanks Again!

 

Chippy.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...