Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • click the link. dx  
    • There are two things to immediately clarify. Firstly, why did court papers go to the wrong address?  In 99% of backdoor CCJ cases here the person moves and doesn't update the vehicle log book address.  Or they move and they don't inform the parties who they are in legal dispute with of the new address.  Does either of these apply to you? Secondly, given this has been going on for over three years without presumably any ill effects on you, how important is it for you to have a clean credit file?  I ask as, if you do absolutely nothing, the CCJ will disappear in April 2027.
    • Sorry to ask, but I know I had SB template on PC, but can't find it. Also any search for template\SB letter takes me back here.  Any help to get to SB letter would be appreciated. I know I used it on a car HP co that wouldn't honor my FCS refund and after 6 years came threatening ( or rather their DCA). Worked a treat. Thanks in advance
    • Received this letter today after all this time !! Doesn’t sound like just a threat any advice please  Thanks  Photo.pdf
    • Good evening. Hoping to keep this short and concise. Any help really appreciated! Sent originated from council tax in 2019.  I moved address for a new career 240miles away in December 2019 and have lived here ever since.  A distant friend resides at previous address.  A CCJ was filed regarding this debt in January 2020 but no correspondence was received my end or at the old address.  Move forward to this year; early April I learn of a letter received from Bailiff - Notice of Enforcement dated 13/03. Stated I had ten days to settle a payment/payment plan or £75 will be added after ten days from 13/03 and bailiff instructed to visit.  Obviously I was unaware of this letter till well after the time period passed. Attempted to contact Dukes via email but zero response. Asked for breathing space in order to check the original debt with the respective council (I wasn’t awarded a week of Housing despite being on UC for a short period due to a contract date given by the old employer).  29/04 a note was left at the old address stating a bailiff had visited. New balance £310 more than original outstanding.  I’ve since contacted both the council and the bailiff agent to state I’m more than happy to settle the original debt over a payment plan but at this stage they will not remove the fees despite all correspondence not being sent to me and obviously me only seeing them much later than one would have expected.  Tried live chat today with the company and firstly was told the fees will remain because I spoke to the enforcement agent - I have never spoken to him/her.  secondly told the fees would remain because “I tried to use their web chat service to complete an income form” - I have zero recollection of doing this and I also wonder if it’s another tactic? any help on where I stand with the fees added would be incredible. Thank you
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Is This Legal


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5099 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Have just had a reply from Adobe

 

    RE: Copying software‏
    From:                     [b]Chris Stickle[/b] (cstickle@adobe.com)                                                             Sent:         07 October 2009 17:35:51           To:          electron99


                    [color=black]Totally illegal…thanks [/color]


 [color=black]Chris Stickle[/color]
 [color=black]Enforcement Manager, Anti-Piracy[/color]
 [color=black]Adobe Systems Incorporated[/color]
 [color=black]601 Townsend St.[/color]
 [color=black]San Francisco, CA 94103[/color]
 [color=black]415.832.5187[/color]
 [color=black]415.832.5140 fax[/color]
 [color=black]cstickle@adobe.com[/color]


[b]Sent:[/b] Wednesday, October 07, 2009 9:20 AM
[b]To:[/b] piracy adobe
[b]Subject:[/b] Copying software




[img=http://gfx1.hotmail.com/mail/w4/pr01/ltr/i_safe.gif][img=http://gfx1.hotmail.com/mail/w4/pr01/ltr/i_safe.gif][img=http://gfx1.hotmail.com/mail/w4/pr01/ltr/i_safe.gif][img=http://gfx1.hotmail.com/mail/w4/pr01/ltr/i_safe.gif][img=http://gfx1.hotmail.com/mail/w4/pr01/ltr/i_safe.gif]This company
http://www.xltrading.co.uk/store/categories/PC-Software/

Is selling copies of your software for £3.50-£4.50. 
Please can you confirm that they are trading legally, and it is all right 
to purchase from them.

electron99  

So it seems the days of XLTrading are numbered.

 

 

Very good post electron99 :)

 

Answer this XL trading, why then would a user pay you for a "copy" of a product they already own ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Xl trading i note that you have dodged my questions

 

please refer them on page one and get back to me

 

also i note you quote the copyright 1999 please point to me the relevent paragraph i have a copy of this on my shelves and would like to browse the relevent section

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very good post electron99 :)

 

Answer this XL trading, why then would a user pay you for a "copy" of a product they already own ?

 

We await a response from 'Chris' himself and await his legal permission (which you need on forums by the way) to post any private email message on a public forum.

 

Why would people pay for a copy of a product they already own?

Good question, we will answer that.

 

Are you a gamer?

Do you have children?

Do you let your children play your games on their console?

Do your children treat the discs with respect and great care?

 

OR if you do not have kids:

 

Should you wish to own a backup copy of expensive software you have purchased in case of disc breakage, scratches etc.. then you can legally use a service like ours to provide such a service to you providing you LEGALLY own the media (have purchased it)

 

We hope this answers your question for you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that they sell TomTom Maps also, I have emailed Tomtom to ask if it is ok to buy from them :-)

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

few quick questions then about xl trading

 

whats the registration number for the data protection commisioners? ive looked but im unable to find one

 

the disclaimer list exclusions under the uks copyright & patent act 1999 however only provides an extract from us law.

 

theres several films out for "backup copy" that are not out in the cinema yet notably "up" explain how this is legal

 

After the events of this week, I will not be divulging any personal or commercial information about our site. Not that I would be witholding the information, but that information we have already (or not) posted to the net this week has seen

* People impersonate us to Nominet - illegally

* Report us to FAST without ANY evidence... FAST agree with us

 

You can see why we are not obliging at the moment.

 

The films you mentioned which are not out in the UK are available for import from other areas around the world which we do import in from a lot of different areas. Again, we would not sell a backup copy UNLESS the client clearly legally states, they already own an imported/or UK owned version of the same media.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why would people pay for a copy of a product they already own?

Good question, we will answer that.

 

Are you a gamer?

Do you have children?

Do you let your children play your games on their console?

Do your children treat the discs with respect and great care?

 

OR if you do not have kids:

 

Should you wish to own a backup copy of expensive software you have purchased in case of disc breakage, scratches etc.. then you can legally use a service like ours to provide such a service to you providing you LEGALLY own the media (have purchased it)

 

We hope this answers your question for you :)

 

 

So what proof is provided that they actually own a legal original of the software, when you sell your items to people as "backup" copys ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that they sell TomTom Maps also, I have emailed Tomtom to ask if it is ok to buy from them :-)

 

Again.. read the terms and conditions.

You MUST already own the product to use this service.

Quite clear and black and white.

 

We sell nothing, on the site illegally.

We offer a service where we can duplicate legally purchased media, or reinstall something which you must already legally own.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We await a response from 'Chris' himself and await his legal permission (which you need on forums by the way) to post any private email message on a public forum.

 

Why would people pay for a copy of a product they already own?

Good question, we will answer that.

 

Are you a gamer?

Do you have children?

Do you let your children play your games on their console?

Do your children treat the discs with respect and great care?

 

OR if you do not have kids:

 

Should you wish to own a backup copy of expensive software you have purchased in case of disc breakage, scratches etc.. then you can legally use a service like ours to provide such a service to you providing you LEGALLY own the media (have purchased it)

 

We hope this answers your question for you :)

 

All well and good, but you appear not to realise that Microsoft in paticular do not allow any backups for any reason, since you are purchasing the right to use the software and not outright ownership.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what proof is provided that they actually own a legal original of the software, when you sell your items to people as "backup" copys ?

 

Under UK law, the terms and conditions state, you must own the original item - the check box at the end of the order, which the client MUST agree to (agreeing to the site T&C's) provide us to be absolved for any misuse of any product on our site.

 

We are not pirates, nor would we ever wish to be :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up is only being released in the cinema on Friday, it is not available to buy on DVD anywhere in the world yet and isnt released on DVD until November 10th in the USA.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up is only being released in the cinema on Friday, it is not available to buy on DVD anywhere in the world yet and isnt released on DVD until November 10th in the USA.

 

Up has been in cinemas worldwide for a few months I believe.. I will check this but I am sure this is the case as my stepdaughter I believe visited our local Odean to see it.

 

I believe certain retailers in the US and China are already stocking the item, which we did import from (China)

 

And yes.. it is the original sealed product.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under UK law, the terms and conditions state, you must own the original item - the check box at the end of the order, which the client MUST agree to (agreeing to the site T&C's) provide us to be absolved for any misuse of any product on our site.

 

We are not pirates, nor would we ever wish to be :)

 

 

So you are saying you require no material evidence that the customer owns that product, and if called upon could contact your customer database and all the customers could prove they have a legal right to have what you have supplied ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

All well and good, but you appear not to realise that Microsoft in paticular do not allow any backups for any reason, since you are purchasing the right to use the software and not outright ownership.

 

Microsoft do not have any legal power in the world to stop you making a backup copy of something you legally own- if they did, why would they allow you to 'rip' a copy of a legally owned CD to your XBOX 360?

 

Would this not be the same thing?

 

You would be making 'ANOTHER' copy of a CD or tracks onto another medium - without needing their consent which is perfectly legal to do.

 

Unless someone legally comes out and looks into this, and I mean, REALLY looks into this, no-one so far has come out - from the legal profession - I might add to devalue this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

visit imdb.com -> up release date worldwide is 9th october.

 

todays the 7th. please explain :)

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you are saying you require no material evidence that the customer owns that product, and if called upon could contact your customer database and all the customers could prove they have a legal right to have what you have supplied ?

 

We do require that the checkbox be ticked which signify's that the terms and conditions have been read and agreed to.. this absolves us legally from any misuse by the client.

 

It is a clients right to use our service and use it legally, and we do not condone ANY misuse of this right.

 

The clients we have on the site legally have to abide by the terms and conditions of usage of our services or they are not allowed to be a part of XL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Microsoft do not have any legal power in the world to stop you making a backup copy of something you legally own- if they did, why would they allow you to 'rip' a copy of a legally owned CD to your XBOX 360?

 

Would this not be the same thing?

 

You would be making 'ANOTHER' copy of a CD or tracks onto another medium - without needing their consent which is perfectly legal to do.

 

Unless someone legally comes out and looks into this, and I mean, REALLY looks into this, no-one so far has come out - from the legal profession - I might add to devalue this.

 

Not really as the person is not paying to do this or paying for a service to supply this. This is their product they are using. While we are on the subject, why is it then that most dvd's and music are copy protected and can not be "ripped" without bypassing this illegally ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

We do require that the checkbox be ticked which signify's that the terms and conditions have been read and agreed to.. this absolves us legally from any misuse by the client.

 

It is a clients right to use our service and use it legally, and we do not condone ANY misuse of this right.

 

The clients we have on the site legally have to abide by the terms and conditions of usage of our services or they are not allowed to be a part of XL.

 

 

Surely your own terms and conditions do not excuse you from law ? by your own admission you do not ask for any proof other than a tick box...

 

you say you do not condone any misuse of this right, yet make no actual attempt to ascertain if they really own the product or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

visit imdb.com -> up release date worldwide is 9th october.

 

todays the 7th. please explain :)

 

Did you check the IMDB Box Office/Business portion - I believe you did not.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1049413/business

 

Russia had it open on the 31/5/2009 I believe with an opening profit of $3.8m

 

The Philippines opened on 23/8/2009 also.

Quite clearly proof, that the worldwide release date IS NOT 9th October.

 

EDIT: It also seems that the US DID have it before us also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you check the IMDB Box Office/Business portion - I believe you did not.

Up (2009) - Box office / business

 

Russia had it open on the 31/5/2009 I believe with an opening profit of $3.8m

 

The Philippines opened on 23/8/2009 also.

 

Quite clearly proof, that the worldwide release date IS NOT 9th October.

 

 

your right there, although ! this is a "cinema" release, not a DVD release. and NOT in the UK, so would it not be illegal for someone to purchase the dvd in the UK until release ?

 

 

France 13 May 2009 (Cannes Film Festival) USA 16 May 2009 (Hollywood, California) (premiere) Russia 28 May 2009

Canada 29 May 2009

USA 29 May 2009

Egypt 3 June 2009

United Arab Emirates 3 June 2009

Kuwait 4 June 2009

Colombia 5 June 2009

Mexico 5 June 2009

Uruguay 5 June 2009

Venezuela 5 June 2009

Argentina 11 June 2009

Georgia 11 June 2009

Lebanon 11 June 2009

Peru 11 June 2009

Thailand 11 June 2009

Ecuador 12 June 2009

Panama 12 June 2009

Romania 12 June 2009

Ukraine 18 June 2009

Israel 23 July 2009

France 29 July 2009

Indonesia 29 July 2009

Hong Kong 30 July 2009

South Korea 30 July 2009

Spain 30 July 2009

Taiwan 31 July 2009

China 4 August 2009

Croatia 6 August 2009

Estonia 7 August 2009

Latvia 7 August 2009

Singapore 7 August 2009

Portugal 13 August 2009

Philippines 19 August 2009

Czech Republic 20 August 2009

Lithuania 21 August 2009

Iceland 26 August 2009

Slovakia 27 August 2009

Australia 3 September 2009

Brazil 4 September 2009

Netherlands 6 September 2009 (Amsterdam) (premiere) Greece 10 September 2009

New Zealand 10 September 2009

India 11 September 2009

Germany 17 September 2009

Austria 18 September 2009

Slovenia 24 September 2009

Bulgaria 25 September 2009

Norway 25 September 2009

Denmark 2 October 2009

Belgium 7 October 2009

Netherlands 7 October 2009

Finland 9 October 2009

UK 9 October 2009

Hungary 15 October 2009

Italy 15 October 2009

Poland 16 October 2009

Sweden 16 October 2009

Turkey 16 October 2009

Japan 5 December 2009

they are the release dates for cinema from
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1049413/releaseinfo#akas

Can not find anything that states dvd is released as yet.

Edited by 2ltr16valve
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not really as the person is not paying to do this or paying for a service to supply this. This is their product they are using. While we are on the subject, why is it then that most dvd's and music are copy protected and can not be "ripped" without bypassing this illegally ?

 

Agreed.. however the basis is still the same I believe.

We own a legal CD which Microsoft allows you to 'rip' to the 360 - allowing for a perfect reproduction of a full CD OR individual tracks.. provided the CD is legally owned.

 

Do Microsoft check if you are using an original CD before letting you do this - no.

 

Exactly the same apart from - a person that cannot duplicate a media item themselves, can ask us to do it for them.

 

There is software on the market I believe, that allows you to legally backup DVD's as well... I think it is AnyDVD - but the fact remains, this product could not exist without the fact, that we are legally allowed to make backups as long as we own the original product, purchased.. and that the use of it DOES NOT aid piracy or is illegally used.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely your own terms and conditions do not excuse you from law ? by your own admission you do not ask for any proof other than a tick box...

 

you say you do not condone any misuse of this right, yet make no actual attempt to ascertain if they really own the product or not.

 

We are not there to hold clients hands at the end of the day - neither are Microsoft.

 

Again, I know I keep mentioning it.. but under legal law.. we are totally absolved from any legal comeback on something that HAS to be legally agreed at the end of the day.

 

All we can say is, DO NOT use this product illegally.

We do not have to accertain at all... you come onto a site, agree its T&C's and abide by its rules.

 

It is the same for this site for example.

Why do you think they have a tick box when registering?

 

You have to agree to the sites terms and conditions as it absolves CAG from any wrongdoing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.. however the basis is still the same I believe.

We own a legal CD which Microsoft allows you to 'rip' to the 360 - allowing for a perfect reproduction of a full CD OR individual tracks.. provided the CD is legally owned.

 

Do Microsoft check if you are using an original CD before letting you do this - no.

 

Exactly the same apart from - a person that cannot duplicate a media item themselves, can ask us to do it for them.

 

There is software on the market I believe, that allows you to legally backup DVD's as well... I think it is AnyDVD - but the fact remains, this product could not exist without the fact, that we are legally allowed to make backups as long as we own the original product, purchased.. and that the use of it DOES NOT aid piracy or is illegally used.

 

 

Hit the nail on the head there in your last sentence.... "and that the use of it DOES NOT aid piracy or is illegally used" your not ensuring this, merely asking "are you legally allowed this" and then selling it.

 

Let me put this a different way, say a large supermarket chain has a customer buying spirits.... they ask, "are you over 21?" "yes" the customer replies. "ok, we will sell you this then".... not asking for PROOF is breaking the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

your right there, although ! this is a "cinema" release, not a DVD release. and NOT in the UK, so would it not be illegal for someone to purchase the dvd in the UK until release ?

 

they are the release dates for cinema from

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1049413/releaseinfo#akas

Can not find anything that states dvd is released as yet.

 

Correct however....

Have you never gone on holiday especially to the US or Japan and seen something REALLY cheaper than over here which is not over here yet?

 

I have.

And I've also purchased quite a lot from outside of the UK as well which is not over here yet.

 

People can purchase the items outside of the UK, and then use our service legally as long as they own the product.

The same rule applies - but the customer MUST have purchased the item to use our service.. we are very strict on this policy.

 

Not to appear sarcastic - but you can import items from other countries I believe :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...