Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tenancy Deposit: few quick questions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We moved into a property last week. Our deposit was paid on the 9th September, and thus far we've received nothing from our landlord regarding its protection. We visited our local county court yesterday who were, to put it mildly, a bit clueless.

 

The questions I have are:

 

1) We are multiple claimants (i.e. there are 3 of us in the property). The N208 form doesn't seem to accommodate more than one claimant, so what is the procedure? Does each one of us have to fill in a separate N208, and pretty much copy the facts of the case, and submit the three at the same time. Presumably there's still only one fee for submitting the claim?

 

2) With regard to fees, is there anything else, other than the £150 we could have to pay? The court office couldn't seem to understand what I was asking (!). Is a s.214 case liable to an allocation fee and a hearing fee (the latter is £1000, it would seem!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just jotting up on all this myself to do a claim, however when you speak to any of the 'Deposit Protection Schemes' they all state they will speak only with the lead tenant or the landlord. Hence I would have thought you should nominate a lead tenant amongst you and this should be the claimant, to reduce confusion?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the thing that is a bit of an issue is Jacklin v Fraser Property Management Ltd, T/a Martin and Co (Bedford), where the judge threw the case out due to only one tenant (of joint tenants) bringing a claim improperly. So I just wanted to clarify how exactly we need to bring a claim as joint tenants 'correctly' (so to speak!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't you rather jumping the gun here? You only just moved in having paid the deposit on 9 September, it is now 29 September and you are leaping in to court???

 

Have you contacted your LL or LA and requested whether deposit is protected and the information relating to same. I know they are supposed to supply it within a particular time frame, but I doubt a judge will have much sympathy with your taking this action at this stage. The judge is likely to want to see that some effort was made to negotiate an agreement between the parties before taking the court route (and "wasting the court's time").

 

Also, bear in mind that these 3xdeposit claims are fast tracked now, not small claims, and therefore lay you open to some pretty hefty costs if you lose.

 

Have you sent a letter before action?

 

I give advice to lots of people here with genuine problems in getting their deposits back from landlords, but all I see here is greed.:(

Kentish Lass

Information given is based on my knowledge and experience and is not to be considered as legal advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes sorry should have mentioned we sent a letter on 25th September, to which we haven't had a reply as yet. Mentioned wanting a reply within 7 days on the letter (which obviously aren't up yet), so just looking at what the next step is if we don't receive a reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know what it is like where you are but I live in North London and have had to wait 2 weeks before recieving some of my mail because of the strikes.

 

From what I can tell claiming for x3 deposit due to landlord not using TDS before you have moved out is very hit and miss with some Judges stating that as long as the full deposit is protected before the tenant moves out the landlord is not liable to pay the tenant x3.

 

As Kentish Lass says you now have to pay a considerable amount to bring about a claim and could be made to pay your landlords costs as well if you lose so I don't feel that it's worth taking them to court now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take issue with the claim we're being 'greed[y]'. Our landlord appears to be mortgaged up to the hilt (13 properties all with mortgages) and 3 previous companies which ended up being wound up (there's also a bit more back-story which I'd rather not go into). I'm grateful for people's advice, but if anyone could address the specific questions I asked I'd be even more grateful!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...