Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I think his point is renewing his season ticket shows it wont happen again. using contactles doesnt.
    • Thanks dx for your guide. Yes, I will use their services, but not often. I usually spend around 80 per month, but the season ticket price is 160. I plan to renew it as long it could help me to show that I will not do it again.
    • if you are going to be using its services yes if not no. STOP PANICKING........ yours is not the next move. dx  
    • You could try this and include a copy to the SRA who are being particularly tolerant to this bunch of jackapes. This also shows that you are not to be messed with and are capable of stirring up trouble for them when they step out of line. Dear DCBL, I am in receipt of your letter of 18th April 2024 regarding CPR1.1 After studying the whole section I cannot see anywhere that I am required to furnish you  with my mail address or my phone number. Perhaps you would be kind enough to provide me with a reference to it. I suspect that your subterfuge is designed to allow you to bombard uninformed litigants with last minute information on the day of their Court case which appears to occur at times with your company. I notice that you are asking for proportionality at the same time as you are demanding  an unlawful £160 when you are aware that under PoFA the maximum that can be demanded  is only £100. You will note  that I have included the Solicitor's Regulation Authority into our conversation in order to ensure your reply. And your old excuse of "admin. error" is surely wearing a bit thin even with the SRA. so I look forward to an apology for your error and a declaration that you will desist from trying to hoodwink other motorists in future.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Home Insurance Claims turns into Cheque Fraud nightmare


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I made an insurance claim in April 2009 for a damaged PC, my insurers name is Assurant Solutions which was previously called D&D Homecare. I made a few calls and was told that a local agent would visit my property and assess the claim. On the 20.05.09 the agent came and processed the details and said I should expect a cheque within 2 weeks...great I thought! Two weeks came and went and I called back, I was told it was in the post and to still expect it, another call made with the same outcome the week after. Later that month I got a voicemail asking me to get back in contact... turns out it had been cashed already. I explained that it wasn't me that did it and that it never got to my address, I was told that there was nothing that could be done about it and that they didn't know what to do about it really, I was told that I would need to take it up with the police and the postal service (I thought they would be the ones who were responsible for this action and not me). I spoke to another few advisors and eventually it got escalated to a woman called Maxine who was a Manager in the contact center, she needed copies of my bank statements for the times when the cheque was cashed to prove that it wasn't me - I sent these twice as the first ones couldn't be found at their office, even though they had been signed for via recorded delivery. I was told that a trace would need to be done now that I had proven that it wasn't in my bank account and that they would see whom was responsible for cashing it etc. a 6 week timescale was given for this trace. 6 weeks came and went, I made several calls to which I was continually told that Maxine was dealing with it and that I will just have to wait (I had been expecting the money and loaned it from someone else while I waited on the cheque all this time, I still owe this money out!!) I got another voicemail this week from Maxine asking me to call in again, I did so and was asked Do you live alone? yes i replied, she then said that the cheque had been cashed in a store of Harvey and Thompson pawnbrokers, Maxine said that as far as they are concerned it has been cashed under my name using identification of mine... I asked if there was any confirmation of this anywhere or if they had contacted this company to request details about the cheque, where it was cashed, what branch it was etc. Maxine told me that I would have to contact this company and find out for myself, I said that it would be impossible for me to do such a thing as it would be a breech of data protection for H&T to give me info like that - this was duly ignored, Maxine continued to say that it must have been cashed by me or someone with my identification - I felt like I was being called a liar and a criminal in an effort to make me drop my claim for this money, in frustration I then contacted the pawnbrokers and after being transferred through a few different departments I spoke to a manager called Sam who said that there was very little information she could give me due to Data Protection, she did however confirm that no one using my name or registered to my address had any activity within any of their branches within 2009 relating to cheque cashing. Sam said that my insurance company would have to enter into written correspondence to confirm what they had just told me, that my insurer would also have to give them give them details of the cheque which they will then investigate and respond back with further information on where and who it was cashed by. She also said that it would have to be reported as fraudulent activity to the police by themselves and my insurer (I thought my insurer should have already also done this by now) I have since contacted Assurant again and was told that they already had the head office address and were going to go ahead with the correspondence!! Why was iI asked to contact them myself if they already had the details of their head office?? Anyway this is as far as its got so far.

 

Its now Four and a half months since I made my claim, the cheque was for £650. I have made numerous calls and each time feel helpless at the end of it, I've received some of the worst customer service experiences of my life calling this company. I now fear that this cycle may never end until I give in and count the money as lost.

 

Can anyone help or offer advice.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Either threaten your insurers with the small claims court and/or the newspapers if you are not in receipt of the money within 14 days. I would say that until you receive the money, the sender is responsible for any mishap. Small claims court probably the best. Send your letter recorded and give them 14 days to get the money to you before you proceed with the claim in the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...