Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
    • Thanks for uploading the appeal.  It was a waste of time but well done in not outing the driver. Why have your friends paid £60 they don't owe to a cowboy private company that have no means of making them pay as they don't do court?  If they paid by card, as I presume they did, they should get on to their bank and do a chargeback immediately. We call the £70 the Unicorn Food Tax.  The law specifically states they are only allowed to charge the original £100 but the PPCs and their bezzies in their trade associations allow this made-up extra £70 so £100 becomes £170.  Unfortunately for them the law doesn't. Anyway, snotty letter time. There is an example in post 32 here you can tweak as it's the same company but a different car park   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/463964-alliance-anpr-pcn-lease-car-appeals-refused-daymer-bay-cornwall/page/2/#comments  
    • Thank god you're not a part of the tribunal! Terribly biased and negative.  HR isn't all knowing. And this case proves it. Thanks again for your opinion.  I'm not going to court because of a few emails, I'm going to court because the head of HR has invented a PCP solely for me, which no other employee is made to sit. The language used in the emails is discriminatory and inflammatory.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My claim is stayed pending...


RETURNED TO SENDER
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Only if they don't pay.

 

There was a list somewhere of defaults against Barclays - there were lots!

 

I don't suppose it matters to them - don't pay up and get a default - big deal - it's not like they are going to be filling in Credit Card applications any time soon.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I filed on the 20 May and then received a reply from a solicitor acting on behalf of Lloyds TSB who are based in Brighton, they have made a request under part 18 of the civil procedure rules for more information which is.......

 

Each and every individual amount of the charge I am claiming, the dates and how I calculated the sum.

They threaten that if they do not hear from me that they will get my claim struck out.

 

What I would like to know is do I have to reply to them and why they cant ask Lloyds for the information.

 

Has anyone else come accross this situation ?

IT IS MINE !!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would a copy of the spreadsheet suffice?

FIRST DIRECT: £4751.86 SETTLED IN FULL 5/07/06 :-)

 

TESCO VISA CARD: £90 SETTLED IN FULL 12/08/06 :)

 

LLOYDS TSB: £4403.59 SETTLED IN FULL 17/08/06 :)

EGG: £451.52 SETTLED IN FULL 18/01/07 :)

 

 

Opinions and advice of kazzaw are independent, offered informally, without prejudice, without liability, and not endorsed by the Bank Action Group. If in any doubt, seek the advice of a qualified, insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part 18 does not apply to the small claims track. Therefore you do not have to respond.

 

 

 

I do not know if one can say that they do not know their work or that this is an irregular attempt to browbeat you. I would suggest that you report them to the Law Society. Either way the Law Society would want to know about any firms of solicitors who are not operating at a proper standard. If the matter gets to court I would also point out to the judge that you have had to deal with this kind of tactic as well.

 

 

I suggest that you write to them and asked them to confirm whether part 18 does apply to small claims track matters.

 

It will be very amusing if they write back and tell you -- Yes.

 

It will also be amusing if they write back and apologise for their error.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a sales pitch.

 

If you bought yourself a copy of judge Patricia Pearl's book, Small Claims Procedure: a Practical Guide you would stand less chance of being misled by solicitors who themselves appear not to be familiar with the civil procedure rules.

 

Have a look at my review in the Bookstall. You can buy directly from us using the links to the left of the forum or links in the bookstall. I really do wish a lot more people on this forum would use the book. They would feel much better about their litigation and they will be a lot less work for the people who are running this forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

received letter over the bank holiday advising that they are defending the case!!!

Just cleaning the suit off ready to attend court, i knew if i wanted to file, then id probably end up in court, just going to add my details to the forum so it may help others

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Defendants will have to now submit a defence, on receipt of that you will both have to complete an Allocation Questionnaire and return it to the Court & possibly another fee.

 

The Judge will then decide a hearing date and instruct you both to send all docs you intend to rely on (usually) 14 days before that date

Barclays - £4k - Hearing Date 19th Sept 06

Smile - £370 - Refunded in Full

Capitla One - £100 LBA 25/5

Virgin ? Data Protection Act 25/5

Link to post
Share on other sites

My reply letter went as follows...........................

 

 

Further to your letter dated 24th May 2006

 

You requested information under PART 18 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES from me, further information gathered by me states that PART 18 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES does not apply to small claims track as you should know, however I am enclosing the information requested to try and clarify the situation.

 

I will also send a copy of this letter and a copy of the letter you sent me to the court.

 

I also sent them info gathered online about the rules, just to rub their noses in it further !

IT IS MINE !!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a sales pitch.

 

If you bought yourself a copy of judge Patricia Pearl's book, Small Claims Procedure: a Practical Guide you would stand less chance of being misled by solicitors who themselves appear not to be familiar with the civil procedure rules.

 

Have a look at my review in the Bookstall. You can buy directly from us using the links to the left of the forum or links in the bookstall. I really do wish a lot more people on this forum would use the book. They would feel much better about their litigation and they will be a lot less work for the people who are running this forum.

I must concur - the thought of reading a book about law is enough to put people off. Admittedly, it is not the next bestselling spy thriller, but it is an easy-going book to read, well laid out, and when you need to referene a certain word or topic, the information can be found very quickly...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i might ask, what sort of documents would you be required to send to the court as evidence ?

 

I assume the statements that you received from the DPA request ? If so, would that be enough ?

Lloyds TSB

Data Protection Act Sent 11/05/06

DPA Received 27/05/06

Charges and Interest calculations = £2932.47 (including costs)

Prelim Letter sent 30/05/06

First Refusal letter received 02/06/06

LBA Letter sent 05/06/06

Acknowledgment Received 07/06/06

Final Response Received 08/06/06

Claim Filed (6QZ42741) - 30/06/06

------------------------------------------------------------

Close Brothers (Warrior Group)

DPA Sent 30-05-06

DPA received 14/06/06

------------------------------------------------------------

Capital One - DPA requested 05/06/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I recently made a claim online through moneyclaim online, the defendants expectedly have defended the claim, what concerns me is the reply from the court stating that no further action can be taken online and the case will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation, I will be told shortly where the claim has been transferrred to shortly.

Is this normal practice using the moneyclaim online service ?

IT IS MINE !!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 threads merged - please do not start a new thread for each question.

 

Have the bank filed a response? If so, this is the reason you cannot proceed online - there is nothing more to do online, you cannot obtain a default judgement as they have put in a defence - the only way the claim can now proceed is through your local court.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had letter from Lloyds solicitors in Brighton.asking for same as you but no mention of part 18! Sent off for the book bankfodder recommends by t judge.so i can reply correctly small ammount to pay really.going to carry on asking ? in my own bit

 

Nationwide first,Lloyds last but not least.

 

Why are they asking for specific dates and costs they allready have them on computer!D.P.A.!

 

lancsman

john r

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1893 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...