Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statutory Demand From 1st Credit


mr_mill
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5274 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

This is my first post & any help is greatly appreciated.

 

After about 7/8 years of being in debt it's time to lift this weight as things seem to be taking a more seriuos turn.

 

I have various debts as a result of trying to keep alive a failing business by funding it with credit cards, bad move ! I now realise that but as we all know credit was easy to get ! I had banks throwing money at me, increasing my limits and there we have it, things quickly escalated and I found myself unable to service all my credit cards / loans.

 

The business failed and I was left with creditors / DCA's chasing me for years.

 

Anyway, I had a debt which was assigned to 1st Credit and have had connaught chasing me. I received a stat demand via 2nd class post at my old address a couple of years ago. I ignored it and nothing ever changed, no brankruptcy petition, they just kept sending demand letters and reduced offers of settlement.

 

This debt is now close to becoming statute barred (maybe 6 -12 months off) and I feel they know this and they seem to have stepped up a gear. I have received a stat demand posted through my door from a process server after a couple of failed attempts of delivery.

 

I do own my house although not much equity exists if any and wonder if because this time they are using a process server they are more serious about following through with a bankruptcy petition.

 

My questions are:

 

1) By setting aside this S/D would I be acknowledging the debt and restarting the 6 yr time period ?

 

2) Should I take a gamble & call their bluff by doing nothing & hope they don't petition & it falls into Statute Barred ?

 

3) Is the S/D deemed as served after the process server posted the S/D through my letterbox when I failed to keep a written appointment with him/her ?

 

4) Can they send me two S/D's for the same debt 2 years after each other or is this a breech and invalidates the s/d?

 

5) The original credit card debt is loaded with excessive fee's, they were applying £75 per month in late, overlimit & returned payment fee's plus of course the PPI. Can I put the debt into dispute because of this ?

 

6) Could it be an un-enforcable credit agreement ?

 

I have so many thoughts running through my head and wonder which is the best action to take.

 

I am not trying to get out of paying nothing but these companies have put me in a bad place & changed me. They have a lot to answer for and I feel I'm lucky to be here, people have done terrible things to themselves for far less than I've been through. My wife quite often expected to come home to something terrible. This torture and what I consider to be unfair charges and practices really make me want to fight them and pay less than they claim because I they've all ramped up my original debt.

 

Thankfully, I'm in a really good place right now and can begin to tackle my debts and get my life back in order.

 

I thank you in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My questions are:

 

1) By setting aside this S/D would I be acknowledging the debt and restarting the 6 yr time period ? NO!! Have you good grounds for a Set Aside

 

2) Should I take a gamble & call their bluff by doing nothing & hope they don't petition & it falls into Statute Barred ? As they have used a Process Server its highly likely that they will follow through

 

3) Is the S/D deemed as served after the process server posted the S/D through my letterbox when I failed to keep a written appointment with him/her ?If the process server makes an affadavit outlining the attempts they have made at personal service then the Courts will accept this as proof of service

 

4) Can they send me two S/D's for the same debt 2 years after each other or is this a breech and invalidates the s/d?Yes as an SD only has a limited shelf life

 

5) The original credit card debt is loaded with excessive fee's, they were applying £75 per month in late, overlimit & returned payment fee's plus of course the PPI. Can I put the debt into dispute because of this ?Yes

 

6) Could it be an un-enforcable credit agreement ?Have you sent off a CCA request

I have so many thoughts running through my head and wonder which is the best action to take.

 

I am not trying to get out of paying nothing but these companies have put me in a bad place & changed me. They have a lot to answer for and I feel I'm lucky to be here, people have done terrible things to themselves for far less than I've been through. My wife quite often expected to come home to something terrible. This torture and what I consider to be unfair charges and practices really make me want to fight them and pay less than they claim because I they've all ramped up my original debt.

 

Thankfully, I'm in a really good place right now and can begin to tackle my debts and get my life back in order.

 

I thank you in advance for any help.

 

 

You really need to take this seriously. That said, its not the end of the world and you will get plenty of help here to defeat these parasites

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for your reply ODC. I'm happy that I've found this forum and I'm ready to take them on !

 

As of yet I have not CCA'd this debt.

 

Can I do this even though I've received an S/D ?

 

Is my best course of action to set aside by disputing the debt and then send off for CCA ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mr Mill you must set this aside, as 1st Credit / Connaught have recently had restrictions placed on them by the OFT - The Office of Fair Trading: OFT imposes requirements on 1st Credit over debt collection practices and please report them to the OFT too....

 

Please have a read through here, you've got 18 days from the date on the demand to set aside....if you need help please shout - DCA Legal Successes - The Consumer Forums

Link to post
Share on other sites

First thing I would do is send off for a copy of the agreement - (this costs £1) and send it recorded delivery/guaranteed to 1st Credit / Connaught - http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/581-cca-request-letter - I think a SAR to the original creditor might be a good idea too - http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca

 

You have to use forms 6.4 (set aside) and 6.5 (affadavit) the forms you can find electronically here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/86067-getting-statutory-demand-set.html

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/197272-recieved-connaught-statutory-demand-4.html - there are also links to other cases here too....

 

Is there a court named on the demand ? Is it your local court ? You need to call them to check they handle bankruptcies/insolvencies as some courts don't...(let us know if the court they have named don't handle bankruptcies).....

 

Once you have filled out the 6.4 and 6.5 you need to take them along to the court with any accompanying paperwork (such as the CCA request) and get the court to swear in your documents (this is usually free at local courts, or £5 at a local solicitors - I had heard that it was £12 at the High courts in London)......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing you might want to do, especially if you can record the call, is to ring up and ask to speak to the person named on the SD. Doubtless he will not take your call or be permanently unavailable. This is yet another stick to beat them with

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya mr mill

 

im subbing if i may as was referred to your thread by 42man - thanks

 

i have been very much assured by own problems on this site so you can hopefully get to feel a bit better about stuff

 

keep positive and keep learning and reading all the links others give you

 

you will find out your rights pretty quickly

 

good luck will look in as updates come in

 

take care and dont worry too much

 

laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly thanks again to ODC, 42man, seminole & angel_1.

 

This has been going on so long I'm kinda past the fearful & worrying stage & just live with it but I'm postitive about getting it all sorted out.

 

I'm going to read all this information try to set aside the demand and also CCA them.

 

I shall also complain about their practices because I believe they used the first S/D 2 years ago as scare tactics & the process server has been knocking on neighbours doors to ascertain if I live at the address which I think could be considered as publicly embarassing for me.

 

Also the s/d was not in an envelope so it wasn't kept confidential, I don't know if they should keep concealed but I just thought it should have been. Other family members could have read the s/d but thankfully I'm not hiding anything and that doesn't matter but to some people it does !

 

Anyway , I'll keep you all posted.

 

Thanks again.

Edited by mr_mill
Link to post
Share on other sites

that is good to hear mr mill

 

but i really do hope you are not really a Mr Mill ,,,,,if so quickly change to a psuedo name

 

have a fun day laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 42man.

 

Just a thought, am I better off sending a statute barred letter because I have not contacted them or made any payments in what must be close to six years ?

 

Does the fact that they have still been sending demands in this period mean that it is not statute barred ?

 

I thought statute barred was if I hadn't acknowledged the debt in anyway in six years regardless of the DCA's attempts to contact me.

 

Or perhaps, request a CCA and send statute barred letter together stating I'm requesting CCA because I believe this debt is statued barred unless you can prove otherwise,

Edited by mr_mill
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Babybear39.

 

CCA done , now on with set aside stat demand.

 

Unfortunately I doubt it is statute barred but not far off in the grand scheme of things.

 

I wonder if 1st credit will have the statements & files from my cc company in order to prove it's not statute barred.

 

I expect they will have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...