Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update - Still receiving emails and letters - but have been getting text messages too. nothing aggressive just asking me to get in touch.    the text makes it look like it from the bank on first glance - it reads -   'the banks name' would like to dicuss our recent communication...etc... then lists IDR phone number and email FYI - reporting them as spam
    • Hello, After seeing all of the posts about BMW on here I really wish I hadn't even considered them! I bought a used car from them over the weekend, one specifically which had a reversing camera and cruise control in the advert. I was foolish at the time of purchase and didn't check to see these functions work on the test drive (totally my fault). Now that the car is home I've checked and checked and neither of these functions are available. I even checked on Parkers and it seems that no Skoda Kamiq '21 models come with any parking cameras at all. When buying the car, I was told all that was needed was 'Four signatures and £500' to secure it. I was never shown any of the documents, and instead the sales rep opened a box on his iPad and asked me to sign. He had been complaining about the length of time some customers take these days all throughout my time with him. (Again) foolishly I signed. In my email inbox I now have four attachments from BMW, one of which is my signature under a letter which basically says that the cars don't need to match the advertisements online, or have any of the features that a sales rep talks about. I realise that I've made mistakes in not doing my due diligence here, but thought I might as well ask the experts here if I have any rights left to claim that the car was miss-advertised, or if I unknowingly signed them away? Thanks in advance
    • where was this PCN:? please complete: pers i cant see the point in an sar yet await/if they ever send a letter of claim. as long as you've not moved since 2022 you are OK to totally ignore . dx  
    • ah this is a B2B PCP then as your are sending the SAR as a private individual and not as repping the co. you need to prove to them. unfortunately, i think that will also reset the 30 days. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lack of CCA while in IVA?


Ypnos
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5346 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I'm in my 3rd month of an IVA and I'm wondering if I can challenge one of the creditors, who did not provide a credit agreement for 9 months prior to the IVA. Also, the document they did eventually produce was my signed credit card application with what looks like Ts&Cs photocopied to the back of the document (looks very out of place).

 

Thanks in advance :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you have now entered an IVA i do not see any benefit persuing re cca.

 

what is it that you would hope to acheive doing so?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the amount I owe is pretty much around the minimum amount for entering into an IVA and with my current repayment scheme I will have paid off the debt plus I.P. fees in exactly 5 years. The way I see it, Halifax have been charging me interest while they haven't produced a valid credit agreement, which means that since requesting [the credit agreement] I was not bound by their terms and conditions, therefore that interest should not have been charged to me.

 

When I provided the figures for the IVA, I gave the Halifax debt minus what they have been charging me for all these months. Halifax gave their version of what I owe and the I.P. took that as the correct amount (I estimate about £400 more, which is almost 2 monthly payment's worth).

 

If the amount owed is reduced, then I can either reduce monthly payments or (more likely) pay it off sooner. That way I can finally get rid of this noose from around my neck and start living life as normal again.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

someone wll correct me if i am wrong but if you were to cancel a credior that would cancel the whole IVA and you would be back to square one.

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The IVA is legally binding; it is not like a debt managment plan; you can't chop and change. Also, you will only be paying back around 30% (maybe less) of what you 'owe'. Your income is more rigourously monitored than with a DMP. If you've gone down the trouble of this route, which is stressful in itself, I'd let it ride knowing you'll be debt free in 5 years. It's not a question of paying back early, you'd just have to pay back until the time period set. It's also not a question of Full and final. Only 50% of your creditors have to agree to the plan and its then legally binding on the other creditors. If less than 50% agree then you would have been made bankrupt. It's quite stringent. I really would leave well alone now personally. Once a year they'll check your earnings to see if you can pay more into it. They will take 50% of any bonuses you are lucky enough to earn. This would have all been explained to you at the time I'm sure. If you want to query it, you really should go and talk to the people who set it up for you IMHO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all and thanks brokebutnotbeatn (your monicker describes my life accurately lol). I've taken your advice on board and will follow it by leaving the IVA alone.

 

4 years and 8 months to go! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...