Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Preparation


Tobes
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys - Yasmin, the Forerunner as she shall now henceforth be known :D Eek, and myself have all received court dates (mine's mid-September) so I thought it would be quite a good idea to discuss here what we're going to send to the court and to Egg, and maybe to discuss a gameplan or tactics or intentions or whatever...What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think a going to court pack would be really useful. Thats the scary bit isnt it? I know most of what is needed is already here on the site, but bringing it together would be really good. I'm miles off court as yet, still waiting for my SAR to be fulfilled. but has anyone who has been to court or has settled and done their homework just in case, got anything to add?

 

Remember the 5p's :)

 

Preparation

Prevents

****

Poor

Performance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish you all the luck with your court cases I used to work for egg lol and love reading all these posts - knowing them Im not surprised that they are going all the way they like to think themselves better than all the rest and they are not!! Im not quite sure why they think they are going to win when all the other institutions know they wont lol. All the very best for the court cases (if it even gets there) ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

im planning to rely on 1999 Consumer Credit Act (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts) and 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act.

im filing my MCOL with HSBC next week so anyother bits of legislation or arguments i can incorporate into it would be nice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Matheos95 - thanks for the encouragement :)

 

You wouldn't be able to confirm for us (obviously anonymously, without swearing on a bible lol) that their processes ARE automatic, would you? The letters they send - they appear to be unsigned, automatically produced letters, their charges appear to be added automatically by the system etc etc? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant really part of the exit was a confidentially agreement - but lets put it like this do you think any large bank nowadays does any manual application of standard charges to ALOT of accounts - I DONT! The letters well I would guess that many CC companies have a list of standard letters by number in their system that they could request instantly via a computer system i would imagine there could be anything upto 50+ letters to choose from, but i would also guess that there is alot of manual letters that go out to!! sorry cant help much but still have my fingers crossed for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well ive written to hsbc telling them that actually their justification of the charges being set out in t&cs is erroneous because these charges are illegal under consumer legislation 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act as well as 1999 Consumer Credit Act (Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts) and this is why the OFT is investigating and your customers are taking action against you. As a consumer I am protected by Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCRs) and it is under this legislation that I believe a court would rule in my favour.

the OFT website has a very useful section in there about what is an unfair charge and it clearly states that a punitive charge is an unfair charge.

overdarft charges are punitive becuase they dont reflect the cost of generating letter becuase as it has been said these things are done by automated systems.

as there is no clarification made on statements between what is a manual intervention and what is automated, the customer does not receive full transparant account of what they are being charged for.

i have also read that:

Under 1977 Unfair Terms (contracts) Act, the sheer fact that ALL banks make these charges makes this a breach of the act (the example given is exactly that)

i want to look into this and find out exactly how that works but it does make a convincing case doesnt it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tobes, Not long now.....Don't forget to include the O F T report, April 2006 Calculating fair default charges in credit card contracts. If you prepare properly and adhere to deadlines, even if they don't, it could prevent yet another adjournment.........????

Woolwich won in court/default removed Barclaycard Settled Halifax settled

Capital 1Settled GE Money Settled

Egg Settled-court action re.default 4th hearing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You might like to consider how much they charge for statements or letters that are not part of their obligation under the Data Protection Act.

 

Not sure if egg are trying that, but the other banks are saying that their system isnt a relevant filing system and its a real pain to gather the data (ive only had an acknowledgement of my S.A.R from egg so far). Hence 3 quid per month or similar.

 

But they charge 20 quid or so for automatic letters and charges, cleary weird since manual intervention to provide microfiche statements would be quite time consuming, according to the banks and therefore the charges should reflect a commerical rate based on the time and effort dont you think?

 

Not sure this coud be used with egg but im sure it would interest a judge for banks that do this.

 

HTH

 

Glenn

 

PS if you wan to see what i wrote check out Glenn vs Barclaycard, having re read it i would make some changes but then i always do that.

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

YW

 

It came to me when i got the letter from barclays saying how they didnt understand about smith vs lloydd or whatever its called.

 

I wrote and asked how they could justify theyre chagres bearing in ind the disparity between the effort of the two actions.

 

Wonder if anyone will read it at barclay card or it will end up in the 'not satisfied pile'!!

 

Like to be there if if they do just to hear what they say.

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Tobes, Want any support in court? Know it's September ;-) . Just let me know!

Woolwich won in court/default removed Barclaycard Settled Halifax settled

Capital 1Settled GE Money Settled

Egg Settled-court action re.default 4th hearing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...