Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IND Ltd Harley Street


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4661 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

FV-1 Inc is a trading name of Morgan Stanley of 25 Cabot Square. If you search the Information Commissioners Office Register for "FV-1 Inc" and "Morgan Stanley" you will see the same address. I suspect that HSBC Bank plc (of which I believe Metropolitan Collection Services Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary) as assigned your debt to Morgan Stanley T/A FV-1 Inc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you so much for that. the letter i received from (had to sign for) was from IND Ltd, Harley Street and had an order attached from my local County Court. does this mean that HSBC or whoever has already had an attachment of earnings agreed? i have had no other correspondence from them to say what this supposed debt is about. i have to send the form directly to the court apparently and call IND to let them know if have done it but i want to know what the supposed debt is first. any suggestions as to how i give myself some breathing space to investigate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Licence Number:0587751Licence Status:Current

Current Applicant / Licensee:

Business Name Company Registration Number

I.N.D Limited 3283064

 

Categories:

Consumer credit

Consumer hire

Credit brokerage

Credit reference agency

Debt adjusting/counselling

Debt collecting

 

Right To Canvass Off Trade Premises:No

Trading Name(s) (Current):

IND

 

Issued Date: 29-Jul-2006 Expiry Date: 28-Jul-2011

Legal Formation:

Body Corporate (incorporated inside UK)

 

Current Individuals that run the organisation:

Name Position

David Ivaston OFFICER

Stephen John Wise OFFICER

 

Current Organisations that run the organisation:

Name Company Registration Number Position

EL Services Ltd OFFICER

 

Nature of Business:

Debt Collection

 

Current Address(es):

Address Type Address

Correspondence PO Box 239, ., Stamford, Lincs, PE9 4WX

Principal Place Of Business Spa House, Spa Road, Braceborough, Nr Stamford, Lincs, PE9 4NS

Registered Office 25, Harley Street, London, W1G 2BR

 

Historic Address(es):

Address Type Address

Principal Place Of Business Spa House, Spa Road, Bruceborough, Nr Stamford, Lincs, PE9 4NS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Current organisation that runs the organisation:

E L Services Limited; a non trading company???

what a tangled web they weave; as ever:

 

Name & Registered Office:

E.L. SERVICES LIMITED

25 HARLEY STREET

LONDON

W1G 9BR

Company No. 03079460

 

 

 

 

Status: Active

Date of Incorporation: 13/07/1995

 

Country of Origin: United Kingdom

 

Company Type: Private Limited Company

Nature of Business (SIC(03)):

7499 - Non-trading company

 

Accounting Reference Date: 31/12

Last Accounts Made Up To: 31/12/2008 (DORMANT)

Next Accounts Due: 30/09/2010

Last Return Made Up To: 13/07/2009

Next Return Due: 10/08/2010

 

Last Members List: 13/07/2009

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ring your court and find out if the claim has actually been processed - some companies are known to send a 'dummy' claims form out to scare people into paying.

 

If it is a dummy then report them (enclosing a copy of the 'claim form' and any documentation they sent) to the Trading Standards in the area, sadly Harley Street is known to harbour some very dodgy people these days.

 

If it isn't a dummy then let the court know that you haven't had any other paperwork and go for a set aside based on the grounds of the existing unresolved dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you all. i have spoken with the court and they have suggested that i request a set aside but also to cca IND Ltd. i eventually got through to IND Ltd by phone and they are saying that its in relation to something from HSBC in 2005 so i am sending CCA. and have registered my query with the court. do i need to do anything else do you think? once again thanks for all your help guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay lets get this clear.

 

You state that you have received an order from your county court for the production of a statement of means, is this correct?

 

I presume that a court claim was issued prior?

 

Please provide more information.

 

AC

 

although the paperwork was from the court, it wasn't sent by them but by IND Ltd. The Court do have a record of it though as coming from Northampton Bulk

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...