Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx, the only secured debt we have is the mortgage on our property and that is a joint mortgage.    all payments are up to date with a clean credit file albeit with a of debt so no missed payments etc sorry what is f&fs? If I am made redundant I am not wasting it on paying alll this unsecured debt down and leaving my family broke. This is the dilemma I am currently in. i am not sure I can mentally keep living the way I am so I am weighing up how to deal with it without leading to needless ccj threats etc… not sure what direction I am to go in.    
    • How are you funding the privately run supported living housing in the new city ?  Why are you moving? Have you served in armed forces previously? If you are registered with the existing Council as disabled or have other needs they assist with, then depending on the reasons for needing to move, your current Council may help with costs of moving. But you would have to submit an application to them. So you are best to speak to your current council about the help you are seeking.  It is not about a Council being responsible as I don't think there are specific laws saying a Council has to help with costs of transportation. And in regard to Housing costs in new city, as this is going to be private, I don't think the Council will pay under Housing Benefits. You might have to claim Universal Credit, but UC might not cover the full cost as Housing is limited to Local Housing Allowance. Citizens Advice are generally worth contacting about complex Housing issues.
    • I was really hoping these were the kind of comments I was going to get as I’ve never felt so low on my life..
    • Hi. I don't know if we have any social workers here, I'm afraid. I'll flag your thread for site team member @stu007, he may be able to give you a few tips. HB
    • But if it’s the bank themselves emailing me to say they are now looking after the debt… so I still ignore?  also I’ve checked my spam and I’ve had an email from the bank to say that J&P are now also acting on their behalf?  How can they pass it on to two agencies? I’ve not seen any threads with this situation before?  they know from my letter I’m not working atm and  have no assets etc
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Interest & statute barred


staxvolt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If no written acknowledgement or payment has been made to a debt for 6 yrs but interest has continued to be added, can the account still be classed as statute barred.

 

Also what is the situation if £1 sent for cca is credited to the account but within the 6 yr period, is this classed as a payment and therefore acknowledging the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the written acknowledgement that determines Statute barring of debts, as far as I am aware, it is irrelevant if a creditor has been adding interest to a debt.

 

Provided you can show that that £1 was sent for a CCA request, it should not restart the Stature bar time limits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can the account still be classed as statute barred.
Yes.

Also what is the situation if £1 sent for cca is credited to the account but within the 6 yr period, is this classed as a payment and therefore acknowledging the debt.

One of the reasons it is advised that any CCA request sent should be recorded delivery, is that then it can be easily proven that the £1 is for just that. Besides, they would have difficulty convincing a court that someone had only paid £1 in six years and it was pure coincidence that it was at the same time as the CCA request.

Edited by cerberusalert
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for quick response.

So statute barred remains even if interest is added as this a bank transaction and not the debtors.

The £1 for cca appears to be a bit tricky.

Could they really convince the court this was payment if the sum was sent within the cca letter recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So statute barred remains even if interest is added as this a bank transaction and not the debtors.
Yes it remains Statute Barred.

Could they really convince the court this was payment if the sum was sent within the cca letter recorded delivery.
Only if Paul McKenna was acting for them. ;)

 

It was a typo in my original reply it should have been 'would have difficulty'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

For a debt to be statute barred there must not have been any written acknowledgement to the debt, no payment has been made towards the debt during this 6 year period, and no legal action has been taken against you, then the debt will be statue barred.

 

The Limitation Act stipulates that when a debt is statue barred, the creditor is unable to obtain any county court judgment to recover the money from you. In accordance with this, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has issued a document called 'Office of Fair Trading's Debt Collection Guidance. This states that a creditor is not able to pursue somebody for a debt that is statue barred once the debtor has claimed that the Limitations Act applies, if they continue they would be effectively causing harassment and you may proceed to make complaints to the FOS and OFT.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you acknowledge or pay anything then yes the clock will restart

 

 

IF A PAYMENT OR LETTER IS RECEIVED WITH IN SIX YEARS OF THE LAST PAYMENT, THE STATUTE CLOCK WILL RESTART

 

ANY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OR PAYMENT AFTER SIX YEARS DOES NOT RESTART THE CLOCK

 

ONCE STATUTE BARRED, ALLWAYS STATUTE BARRED

 

ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS SEND THE DCA OR CREDITOR THE STATUTE BARRED TEMPLATE

 

THEY THEN HAVE TO CEASE ALL COLLECTION ACTIVITY AND CLOSE DOWN THE ACCOUNT

 

BUT YOU MUST INFORM THEM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some interesting points.

If legal action is taken and claim is not successful does this prevent the debt from being sb.

Is this the case even if the debt has not been acknowledged through the claim process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help with my previous post.

I am sure many people receive court claims for a debt they have forgot.

Some may win due to dca/creditor not being able to prove debt.

They may not even know the debt could be statute barred.

If this is the case does the debt still remain statute barred even thought the claimant has not won the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Creditors are still able to pursue an unsecured debt if:

 

They have previously obtained a judgement against you (a CCJ);

 

Once a debt becomes statute barred it remains statute barred whatever then transpires. In other words the debt can never be legally chased through the courts again and nothing the debtor or any representatives do once the statute barring date has passed can alter this situation. So categorically the re-starting of the statutory clock can never occur in any circumstances after the debt has become statute barred so a debts new buyer does not gain any new rights or options but only has those the previous or original owner had when it was sold to them. No more no less period!

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...