Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Can a PPC (claimant) refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paid ticket out of time, now bankrupt yet Bailiffs still banging on my door


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Tricky one this, hopefully someone can advise me please!

 

I received a parking ticket in November 2008, and due to various money problems at the time i didn't pay it, It built up to £110 due in March which again wasn't paid.

 

I made myself bankrupt on 28th April 2009, and after taking advice I used the little money i had to clear my outstanding parking tickets and a court fine i received for a speeding offence before going bankrupt as these would be outside the bankruptcy and would still be owed regardless. These were paid on 24th April.

 

I thought this was the end of it but unknown to me, the parking fine was passed onto Marstons Bailiffs on 21st April. As the Council payment line was via an automated service, the debit card payment i made was rejected and paid back onto my card....... this account was frozen on 28th April and I had no knowledge of this payment being returned.

 

I spoke to someone at the Council who said that they were not obliged to tell me the payment was cancelled and that I had had plently of notice to pay so its not their problem. this is true but at the time I was in such a financial mess that letters and bills just didnt get opened. the Bailiff from Marstons was just as helpful, and told me that regardless of the circumstances it needed to be paid or they would remove my possessions.

 

I thought that at the time of my banruptcy everything was in order, so when i received a warning from Marstons, i didnt read it properly and assumed it was for an old debt. I therefore havent done anything towards paying it and did not realise until now i was legally obliged to pay it. The debt to Marstons is now £317. I do not have this money, and have no means of paying in now or in the near future..... I'm out of work and am barely surviving on the little benefits i get.

 

What options do i have now?

 

Does my Bankruptcy affect this at all? after all, they did not come and take any of my possessions at the time of bankruptcy as they considered that there was nothing of significant value.

 

Would the circumstances above qualify me to make some kind of application to the court for more time to pay the debt or even better for it to be reduced to an affordable amount?

 

What should i do about the Bailiffs in the meantime? He's promised another 'visit' tomorrow :-(

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tricky. You don't really have any legal routes open to you. The bailiffs will want their pound of flesh, but they're only interested in either payment from you or goods to the value of. Their first interest will be the car.

 

Do you still own a car? If not, do you have valuable goods on the premises?

 

If the answer to both is "no", I would speak to the bailiff and explain this. They can return the warrant as "nulla bona" if you are unable to pay the debt, which in effect is a write-off of the debt. After all they can't get blood out of a stone.

 

However if you have a car or other assets (eg computer), then these will be at risk of being taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont have the car anyomre and I don't really have anything of value.... some decent furniture but they're not exactly priceless antiques. I do have a flatscreen TV in my house but it doesnt belong to me. Would the bailiffs try and come in to look around or would they just take my word for it that I don't have anything worthwhile?

 

My girlfriend parks her car outside my house most days too..... i assume they can tell who it belongs to and not try to clamp this right? Or do they rely on me to prove it isnt mine?

 

What I'm worried about is the bill getting bigger and bigger if i dont pay...... how long would they leave it before writing it off as a lost cause?

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you not contact your official receiver. I don't think you have to pay this debt....as the original ticket was before bankrupsy. I think they will confirm this. I think they are trying it on. It doens't matter if you didn't include the debt when you went bankrupt either.

Good luck :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure they would want to come in, and this is where you might run into trouble, if they decide they want to lay claim to your property. They would need to see cast-iron proof that the TV is not your property, and not just a hand-written note from someone.

 

There's also a potential grey area over the girlfriend's car. If she lives there, I think they might be able to claim it, as if it were yours. If she doesn't, I would just not mention her at all to be on the safe side.

 

I think it unlikely that they will try and claim ordinary furniture as it has very little re-sale value, and certain things like beds they can't touch anyway. They're generally after DVDs, computer games, computers - stuff they can auction off at a profit.

 

There is a separate section on the forum for bailiffs and it might be worth posting there too, for some expert advice on bailiff powers and bankruptcy.

 

Remember, you don't have to let them in if you don't want to. Without a car to clamp, what can they do??

 

If Vicky is correct with regard to the debt, you might be able to get them off your case completely. Worth finding out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your advice. Sadly the bankruptcy does not cover council fines/court fines etc as they are not classed as debts, and are not written off.... this is why i tried to pay them off at the time of my bankruptcy. Quite why Leeds City Council Parking department have this massive power over their citizens is beyond me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's also a potential grey area over the girlfriend's car. If she lives there, I think they might be able to claim it, as if it were yours. If she doesn't, I would just not mention her at all to be on the safe side.

 

No there absolutely isn't; it's black and white - they cannot levy against somebody else's property in order to get you to pay. Doesn't matter where the g/f lives, the car is not the debtor's property.

 

(note: otherwise the Official Receiver/Trustee would have had it by now to settle debts)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont't think they could touch my girlfriends car as it isnt even registered to my address and for all they know it could belong to my sick grandmother visiting for the day! They would surely run a check on the ownership fo the car?

 

My concerns are more about the powers of the bailiffs so have reposted in the bailiff forum. I originally queried in this forum as i thought there may be a way to legally oject ot the bailiffs enforcing the original ticket as as far as i was aware it hadf been paid and i have only just bercome aware of the outstanding amount. Is there anything like this i can use?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only recourse you have would be to file an Out of Time Statutory Declaration. You will have to state why it is out of time, and the Council will consider whether they are willing to accept it.

 

They send out notices to the registered keeper, and you would be stating that you did not receive any of this. (You mention above that it reached £110 in March, and that you left some mail unopened, so I assume you were receiving mail about this?)

 

I don't think it's going to succeed, but it's your right to file one if you wish, so long as you don't enter false info on it. You can get the forms from Northampton County Court's website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I went bankrupt back in December '07.

I included council tax debts which had already been to court, I'd not paid and I was due for another hearing where the council stated they were going apply to send me to prison.

Wouldn't that be on the same lines as car parking fines?

 

Anyway Stephen....the original ticket was probably unlawful anyway.

I'm not sure if i'm allowed to post links on here but from what i've heard something like 90% of parking fines are unlawful.

 

Check out parkingappeals.co.uk

 

Vic

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's the info i found......hopefully this applies other places as well as Northampton :-)

 

Traffic regulation orders made under the Road Traffic Regulations Act 1984 are used to impose parking and waiting restrictions on roads or for designating conditions for using parking places operated by regulations. Contravention of a traffic regulation order gives rise to enforcement action and financial penalty. Prior to the introduction of the Road Traffic Act 1991 all such contraventions were enforced by the police or police service traffic warden and the Magistrates' Courts. As such these penalties were "fines" within the meaning of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 and were not provable debts in bankruptcy which were released on discharge.

 

To relieve the burden on the court system the Road Traffic Act 1991 introduced a method of civil enforcement for contravention of traffic regulation orders, moving responsibility for enforcement action from the police and the Magistrates' Court to local authorities. The devolved parking enforcement is achieved by making permitted parking area and special parking area orders. Currently powers are devolved throughout London, in 70 authorities in England and a small number of authorities in Wales.

 

Therefore the manner in which a penalty for a parking contravention will be dealt with in a bankruptcy estate will be dependent on the source of the enforcement action.

 

Where a fixed penalty notice was issued by a police authority and is enforceable by the Magistrates Court the penalty falls within the definition of a "fine" and under the provisions of rule 12.3(2)(a) of the Rules and section 281(4) of the Act it is not a provable debt and the bankrupt is not released from liability on discharge.

 

Where the penalty was issued on behalf of a local authority - including penalties issued in relation to the London congestion charge - these debts are provable debts in bankruptcy proceedings from which the bankrupt will be released on discharge. All penalties imposed under devolved enforcement powers are administered through he Traffic Enforcement Centre at Northampton County Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest janensteve

woo hoo , so local authorities are treated the same as nomal debtors.. way hay !!!!! about bloody time !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

a bailiff collecting a parking ticket must be certificated

 

www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/CertificatedBailiffs/

 

this is a new thing the government has started and is not 100%

put Marston Group in the search and see if his name comes up

if it doesn't do a search of his name if his name comes up and there is no company name he may be self employed if his name appears against another bailiffs company then he should not be collecting (adding charges ) for marston

 

if his name does not appear anywhere on the list phone

Ministry of Justice Public Register of Bailiffs on 020 3334 6355

and ask for confirmation that he is/isn't a bailiff

 

And if he is not a bailiff send him a text asking him what court he was certificated at and on what date

Link to post
Share on other sites

yup...here goes..... Car parking fines - MoneySavingExpert.com Forums

 

I remember a bailiff came knocking and i told him i'd rather spend my money on bankruptsy than give them a penny.He and their call centre told me council tax couldn't be included.......how wrong were they.....

 

hope this info puts a smile on a few faces. Hope its true as well!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

is that for real? I just assumed that it was outside of my bankruptcy, but It certanly reads as though this parking fine (issued on behalf of Leeds City Council and therefore enforced by Northanpton County Court) is not enforceable and can be added to my BR estate. Thanks for this info, I will get onto the Official Receiver first thing on Monday.

 

I'll check out the Bailiff too. I've dealt with a few and this guy is probably the most unpleasant and aggressive of the lot. I'd take great pleasure in informing him that he isnt legal....... fingers crossed :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Decriminalised parking enforcement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

There is a site i came across yesterday where it will tell you exactly which councils operate civil parking.....

 

When i find it i will post...

 

A PCN isn't technicially a fine..... read up and educate them!!

 

In fact, speak to the official receiver too as i advised before and tel them these people are harrassing you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, I remember this from last time...... The Bailiff in question hasnt given his first name. I asked about this before and was told it was so that I couldnt search his address and seek vengeance (as if i would!) . I therefore only have 'Mr Parker' and Marston Group to go on. He is not listed under marston Group but there is a Derek Parker listed on the site, employer is Rundle. What does this mean? I guess i'll need to call the number above but i cant see how a big company like Marston Group would make such a schoolboy error like contracting to this guy...... if he is employed by someone else and like you say above 'shouldn't be collecting for Marstons' What should i do about it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tricky one this, hopefully someone can advise me please!

 

I received a parking ticket in November 2008, and due to various money problems at the time i didn't pay it, It built up to £110 due in March which again wasn't paid.

 

I made myself bankrupt on 28th April 2009, and after taking advice I used the little money i had to clear my outstanding parking tickets and a court fine i received for a speeding offence before going bankrupt as these would be outside the bankruptcy and would still be owed regardless. These were paid on 24th April.

 

I thought this was the end of it but unknown to me, the parking fine was passed onto Marstons Bailiffs on 21st April. As the Council payment line was via an automated service, the debit card payment i made was rejected and paid back onto my card....... this account was frozen on 28th April and I had no knowledge of this payment being returned.

 

I spoke to someone at the Council who said that they were not obliged to tell me the payment was cancelled and that I had had plently of notice to pay so its not their problem. this is true but at the time I was in such a financial mess that letters and bills just didnt get opened. the Bailiff from Marstons was just as helpful, and told me that regardless of the circumstances it needed to be paid or they would remove my possessions.

 

I thought that at the time of my banruptcy everything was in order, so when i received a warning from Marstons, i didnt read it properly and assumed it was for an old debt. I therefore havent done anything towards paying it and did not realise until now i was legally obliged to pay it. The debt to Marstons is now £317. I do not have this money, and have no means of paying in now or in the near future..... I'm out of work and am barely surviving on the little benefits i get.

 

What options do i have now?

 

Does my Bankruptcy affect this at all? after all, they did not come and take any of my possessions at the time of bankruptcy as they considered that there was nothing of significant value.

 

Would the circumstances above qualify me to make some kind of application to the court for more time to pay the debt or even better for it to be reduced to an affordable amount?

 

What should i do about the Bailiffs in the meantime? He's promised another 'visit' tomorrow :-(

 

Thanks in advance

 

 

It is most confusing but a Magistrate Court FINE ( ie; driving whilst uninsured, no having a TV licence etc) CANNOT be included in a Bankruptcy.

 

However council tax CAN BE !!!

 

Parking Charge Notices (PCN) are CIVIL DEBTS and can indeed be included in your bankruptcy.

 

In any event the PCN was incurred long before your bankruptcy and should indeed be included. The Warrant of Execution which was probably issued after the bankruptcy is merely the AUTHORITY to have the debt collected by a Bailiff !!

 

All Bankruptcy Trustees should be able to include the PCN in the debt even though the B/R was a few months ago.

 

Don@t worry...this should be OK !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant, thats great news. Thanks Tomtubby. I'll get my Official Receiver to speak to the Bailiffs and hopefully i can avoid having to deal with the gorilla that knocked on my door this week. My mind is a lot more at ease now :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant, thats great news. Thanks Tomtubby. I'll get my Official Receiver to speak to the Bailiffs and hopefully i can avoid having to deal with the gorilla that knocked on my door this week. My mind is a lot more at ease now :-)

 

 

You will need to provide your trustee with details of the creditor and the reference number etc so that he can include this debt in your bankruptcy.

 

Please do post back here once you have made contact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...