Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Thesis - gone too far!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hmmm, wonder if Gordie will reply?

 

This matter is a national outrage and should be exposed in the media!

the general public will be shocked, when they learn about this matter.

 

I was watching the BBC 10 'O' Clock News last night and heard about all the so-called extra money that is supposed to be going into the education system.

 

Which poses the question;

what was/is the source of this extra money?

 

Student Loans that were bundled up, securitised and sold off to firms such as Deutche Bank, Morgan Stanley and Nationwide for example, these were in turn put into trust funds in the Channel Islands and/or the Republic of Ireland/EEU...toxic debt in limbo.

 

Enter, firms such as Link Financial/Asset Link Capital;

debt buyer(s).

 

You know the rest; harassment.

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Bored tonight so have written to Gordon Brown asking what he plans to do about these companies he has jumped into bed with

 

 

 

This is the draft so don't worry about spelling and grammar it's not finished yet.

 

Looks great to me appart from the sp and grammer as you say :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I am new stumbled onto this thread: by the looks of it I will have something to add to the anti-thesis campaign pretty soon.

 

I just found out Thesis have one of my student loans too from 1996. They sent me a letter saying my deferment was due to end in 8 days. First I heard of their existence. I called them [smelt a rat straight away] and explained I had applied for deferement with SLC. The guy said oh thats fine then they should contact us.. Why are they asking for deferment if SLC handle it I thought. So I called the SLC they went from having no knowledge of thesis to that is someone we work with to they have nothing to do with us as I asked the usual questions. I did manage to speak to a guy in repayments who explained to me what the government have done [sickening]. He told me that the SLC handle deferments and Thesis handle "accounting" so why are Thesis sending me letters out about deferment? He had no answer to that. All he said was that he had both my loans on the system and they had received the application for deferment but it usually only goes through 3-4 days before expiry of the previous deferal.

 

Going from what you guys have said about Thesis I am expecting them to contact me soon claiming I haven't defered and am due to pay DD instruction demands etc etc. Obviously they will deny the previous phone call advising me that it would be handled by the SLC. I am thinking of writing pre-emptively asking them to provide me with a copy of the credit agreement and proof of my liability to them. I don't want to make a deferment to them as in my eyes that indicates an acceptance to contract with them [Am I right in thinking this?]. If I question their letter as an offer to contract asking them to prove their claim against me and they can't produce the documentaion what happens then? Will they write it off? Don't get me wrong I am not trying to avoid paying per se just avoid paying to crooks.

 

It looks to me that the OFT need to get onto this "trading style" [whatever that is] that Thesis claim to be if I can be a part of that I will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please write to your MP, Kate Hoey MP for Vauxhall where their reg office is and also Wayne David MP Caerphilly where that PO Box on the letters you have is based.

 

I am prepared to put money on Thesis not receiving your deferment and then they start harassing you.

 

I'd get in first saying you have had no notice of assignment of your debt with Thesis/Link so you are not prepared to discuss personal and financial details with a company you have not chosen to deal with and unless they can provide proof of assignment of the debt to them then no further correspondence will be entered into

 

Then complain to the OFT, FOS, the MP's above, oh and trading standards.

 

We've had a letter from FOS acknowledging our complaint against Link but nothing else from MPs, FOS, OFT nor anything more from Link

Link to post
Share on other sites

The wealth of info on this forum is superb where have you been all my life!

 

Yeah I think you are right Disgruntled Employee, I am going to email them so I have some evidence they have received it.

 

I will give them a little time before complaining just so I have something more substantial to go to the OFT etc with as evidence of their behaviour. I fully expect them to ignore my email and then start their demands at which point I have a valid complaint to register against them. I usually find the Ombudsman etc won't get involved until you have tried to resolve the issue with the company first. I will just go down that road for the sake of procedure as it seems a forgone conclusion they will not be reasonable.

 

I can only assume with this level of short termism the government expect to lose the next election and are making the job as hard as possible for the next guys. Makes you wonder if democracy works at all... we still get bent over the barrel, only now we have to fill out thousands of forms for the privilege.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't email them as there is no real proof they have received it.

 

Send it in the mail recorded delivery that'll be fine mark it complaint on the front and it'll get to the right person.

 

You have tried to resolve the issue you sent in your deferment you shouldn't have to do anymore than that, now head to the ombudsman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well we had a letter back from FOS today returning our paperwork and asking for a copy of the student loan agreement so if we have it we'll return it with the paperwork and if not then it's back to SLC to get a "copy" and forward it on till that FOS won't investigate as they're unsure whether it's in their remit or not I suppose it depends on what type of student loan it was we shall see, still nothing from anyone else, disgraceful!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right they said they hoped to reply within 14 working days it's 25 working days tomorrow since we had the initial reply so this is going to them:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for another meaningless template letter dated xx where you assure me that you intend to reply within 14 working days. Well considering the incredible delicate situation your companys actions have placed me in I expected an immediate and thorough investigation to have taken place and a reply well within that 14 working days yet despite the fact that it is now TWENTY FIVE working days since i received this letter I am yet to hear anything further from you at all.

 

I am extremely upset that you have chosen to ignore this matter, I wish to assure you that continuing to ignore this issue will not make it go away and will just further strengthen my resolve to get justice for what you have done and continue to do with your reckless and careless attitude to peoples confidential data and cavalier attitude to anyone who dares to complain.

 

It quite frankly beggars belief that with something potentially serious you have not kept me closely informed as to the progress (or lack thereof) of my extremely serious complaint.

 

I am keeping the OFT, FOS, Trading Standards and my MP, Kate Hoey and Wayne David (the MPs for the areas your offices are in) fully appraised of my ongoing situation and I have also made Gordon Brown and David Cameron aware of what is happening to the students who are sold out by the government to disreputable ****** companies such as yours.

 

I promise you this will not go away and urge you to take this matter very seriously, of course should you now wish to make an offer of cash settlement we are prepared to listen but any such offer would also be conditional of a full written apology and of course we would not be prepared to sign any form of non disclosure agreement other than these terms you will find us quite flexible, we can also setup a payment plan to suit your budget

 

(ok last little bit is a bit of a pee take but it's quite fun lol)

 

PS first draft ignore spelling and grammar

Link to post
Share on other sites

You just have to keep banging the table DE!

throw all your toys out of the pram;

start thinking out of the box...

 

Not a time to be disillusioned;

there is a winter of discontent coming up and;

in the spring, a general election.

 

Keep soldiering on.

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...