Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your prompt reply. I have some questions, please: When you say nothing will happen, my 80 year-old mother is worried about potential DCA doorsteppers if/when the debts are sold on - she is a very sweet, quite vulnerable lady and she is worried she may be bullied and harrassed.  If they do come knocking, what should she say?  I told her to say she knows nothing about any of it and they have no right to come knocking on her door and to warn them police will be informed if they come back.  Problem is, I don't think she would be strong enough and can easily be bullied into saying more than she intended once the door has been answered. Next questions: 1)  Should I inform all my lenders that I have moved abroad before defaulting (to avoid the quirky English law loophole thingy that could end up in a CCJ or worse once a DCA gets hold of it)?  2)  Can/should I provide an alternative UK correspondence address to my lenders instead of my mother's home address e.g. my virtual office address for my business - would the lenders accept this as I live abroad now and don't live at my mother's address?  Can I just write and tell them, without any further ado and not get into any further questions about it and cease further correspondence with them and default?  And would this stop DCAs coming to my mother's house as it would not be my current residential address on the lenders files when passed to the DCA?  Do they doorstep previous addresses? 3)  If I don't provide a UK correspondence address will I be at risk of not being aware of any Letters of Claim etc and legal proceedings notices etc not reaching me (there's no reliable postal system in the developing country I've moved to).  Worried this would mean I could end up being taken to court without being aware of it and could end up in a worse situation. 2) What exactly will go on my credit file once I've defaulted, assuming no legal action is taken against me?    4) Should I contact any of my lenders and inform them I have zero assets.  TSB & Sainsburys already have I&E info from me which shows my income  @ £1200/mth is below the combined total of my debt repayments @ £1300/mth and that my income only just covers essential costs of living @ £1200/mth.  Could it be useful to be on my file that I have no assets, so that the DCA clearly see this when the debt is passed to them? Thanks again for any advice.
    • paypal, but i would like to know if anyone knows if there is a certain time limit they have to refund you? thanks
    • Dear lookinforinfo, I'm sorry if I seem stupid, but what exactly am I telling them? -what code/ law / standard have they broken that I will use as an argument in letter? I don't understand the premise of your argument.  I would appreciate it if you could explain it to me clearly and in simple terms so that I understand.  Thank you   
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Thesis - gone too far!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5324 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

printed and posted already ;)

 

FOS is next on the hitlist

 

TS have already started investigating from what I hear

 

Bastards aren't getting away with it the next thing is a SAR going to Thesis see what they have on record etc

 

This one isn't going away I am going to make them PAY!!!!! (pun intended hehehe)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Very Good DE.

 

Let us hope that TS do the job that they are paid to do!

 

Your local TS will have to contact the TS Home Authority for LINK/Thesis, that will be either Caerphilly or Lambeth/London, both of whom have already received many complaints about the firm.

 

When you make the SAR, please mark the payment;

SAR FEE ONLY, otherwise Link are just as likely to credit the payment to the account. Make a copy of the payment and send by recorded delivery.

 

Keep us updated.

 

AC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter to Thesis going in the post tomorrow or Monday

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for yet ANOTHER template letter asking me to get in touch with you totally ignoring the facts presented to xx recently yet AGAIN!

The facts of the matter are as follows:

I have filled in and sent my deferment paperwork in EVERY year as requested when my loan was serviced by The Student Loan company without incident yet since Thesis have been administering it I have had nothing but hassle and grief (which I will go into detail about further down).

Basically my deferment paperwork was obviously lost somewhere between me posting it and you receiving it, you then wrote to me and I immediately sent back copies of everything normally requested in the deferment paperwork, I had NOTHING back from you regarding this.

I then started receiving letters from you asking to get in touch “as we do not want to make decisions about your account without discussing the matter with you in the first instance”. Again we wrote back asking what was going on no reply, in fact we have NEVER had a direct reply to a SINGLE LETTER we have sent you.

You then started phoning my aunt, an elderly lady with serious health issues not the least of which is a very bad heart condition, you then proceeded to demand she pass messages on to me in direct contravention to recent requirements imposed on you by the OFT (copy enclosed). This matter has been reported to the OFT again and has also been passed on to Trading Standards.

 

You then have somehow contacted my father with whom I have had no contact since I was a young child this was due to my parents divorcing and he was not allowed any further contact with me due to SERIOUS concerns for MY safety. Your phone call to him has now prompted him to contact me how he got my address I do not know but going on your current behaviour I believe you gave it to him probably in some way of claiming to confirm my current address. This is a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 and has been reported to the Information Commissioners office.

I am now in fear of my father turning up on my doorstep or wanting further contact with me, I am even more concerned as I now have 2 very young children of my own. Your disgusting behaviour has placed me in a very difficult position and I intend to take this complaint to every government department responsible for overseeing the shambles and disgrace that your company is.

Having done research into your behaviour I have seen that far from being an aberration your current treatment of me and my debt is how you seem to treat many people in a similar situation including those with commercial debts that you have bought.

I called you Monday 3rd August and spoke to xx xx and informed her that:

“With reference to the wireless telegraphy act 1949 I require ALL communications between us to be in writing”

As you can see from the above I have contacted the various government departments to report your gross negligence.

If this matter is now not brought to an immediate close I will also employ a solicitor to deal with you as well.

xx claimed that a large amount of mail to me had been returned to sender, I asked her to forward it to me again as my address is correct so I have no idea why they have been returned. Perhaps under those circumstances a special delivery letter may have been a good idea? I cannot be held responsible for your post not reaching me, I would wager you were sending them to an old address as we have not had ANY problems with our postal service and are on first name terms with our postman.

xx said she would post these letters to us and what a surprise they have not arrived so I think that she had been caught out in her unlawful behaviour and was desperately trying to cover herself. I do not for a single minute believe these letters exist.

 

 

 

What I expect from you in relation to this letter

 

·I want to know why my deferment paperwork has been ignored.

·I want to know why you feel it is acceptable to phone people up with my surname and ask them if they know a “xx xx” and how many other people in the phone book have you called this way.

·I want to know why you never reply to my letters and never send an acknowledgement.

·I want to know what you intend to do about these cacophony of mistakes to prevent it happening again.

·I expect this xx to receive nothing less than a disciplinary hearing over her conduct calling my father.

·I expect you to leave my aunt alone

·I expect my deferment to be sorted out IMMEDIATELY AND backdated to when all this first started.

Failure to deal with the above points will result in further action being taken with:

1.Financial Ombudsman Service

2.Office for Fair Trading

3.Trading Standards

4.The Information Commissioners Office

5.My MP

6.My solicitor

7.Any media outlet I can get to listen to me

Please be rest assured your continued blasé attitude in ignoring me and these will no longer be tolerated your failure to comply will result in further action. I hope it does not come to this but I expect your reply to this letter in the next TEN WORKING DAYS

Edited by Disgruntled_Employee
Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter to my MP

 

I am sorry to be writing to you about a matter that has been causing me enormous problems as I know you and your staff are incredibly busy at the moment and I don’t like to add to the workload but I feel the matter has become sufficiently serious to warrant asking for some help.

Many years ago I attended University and “acquired” a small student loan. Upon leaving there I have never managed to reach the earnings threshold to be required to start paying this money back. All through this time I have sent in my deferment paperwork without fail to The Student Loan Co and never had a problem.

I then started receiving letters from a company called Thesis Servicing who said that they had taken on my loan and all correspondence was now to be with them instead, ok not a problem I thought. I received my deferment paperwork as normal and sent it back and unusually didn’t hear anything back for some time. The next contact I had from them was saying that I owed them money as I had not deferred, again I wrote to them and enclosed copies of everything and once again didn’t hear anything back.

This has been going on for some considerable time, I write to them they ignore me and send me yet another “template letter”.

Thesis then went on to start calling my elderly aunt who has serious health issues the worst of which being a serious heart problem. They have called her repeatedly demanding that she pass messages on to us (which I believe the OFT have already cautioned Thesis for).

The most recent problem being that they have somehow phoned my father. I have not had any contact with my father since I was a very young child and my parents divorced, he was not allowed contact due to fears for my safety. I know they have phoned him as out of the blue and after 30+ years I have had a letter from him telling me that they have called asking about me. Up till this point I had not heard from him at all and now he is writing me letters. I believe that he was given my address by Thesis, possibly under the pretence of confirming my current address. I am now terrified that he is going to turn up on my doorstep and as my mum lives next door and also suffers from extremely bad angina attacks if he did I think it would put her in hospital or worse, not to mention the fact that as I have 2 young children of my own to worry about as well. Luckily Thesis don’t have our phone number or we’d probably now be getting calls as well. This current mess has turned me into a nervous wreck I jump every time there is a knock on the door or the garden gate opens and again if it was not for the fact my mother lives next door I would have to consider moving house.

After receiving this letter I was so upset that I called xx xx at Thesis on 3rd August, she admitted it was her that had phoned him but only because they had had mail returned to them and that she “only worked in the mail department” which I believe to be a total lie. I asked her to send me these letters which she said she would but surprise surprise they haven’t arrived but we are getting post from them as another one of their template letters arrived 2 days later.

I have reported Thesis (a trading style of Link Financial apparently) to:

The Office for Fair Trading and Trading Standards

I also intend to complain to the Information Commissioners Office for breach of the data protection act 1998 and the Financial Ombudsman as well.

I have also written a very stern letter to Link Financial about this as well.

As this whole mess is the fault of the government I was wondering if there is anything you can do to help get this mess straightened out and get some justice for what Link Financial have done to me and my family.

Sorry once again to be writing to you about this matter and sorry for making it such a long letter but if there is anything you can do to help it would be greatly appreciated especially as whilst doing some research I do not appear to be the only one Link is treating in this manner.

I look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

and here's the article proving the UK gov are selling students out to DCA's and generally giving them a right royal shafting

 

Today's Queen's speech saw the government confirm the sale of debt owned by the Student Loans Company to private companies. The “sale of students loans bill” gives permission for the new minister of students, Lord Triesman, to sell part of the SLC's student loan portfolio, including personal information. Around £6bn is expected to be made over the next three years from the sale over next three years, with the total value of the student loan book is sitting at £18billion. If government targets are to be met the value of student loans deb will rise to over £55bn over ten years.

The NUS has expressed concerns that this will lead to students being charged higher rates of interest on their loans. Currently the interest is linked to inflation, so theoretically you only pay back what you borrow. A rise in interest rates on student loans could have disastrous consequences for graduates. Questions were also raised about why the government has chosen to take this course of action. The NUS president, Gemma Tumelty, believes that this shows that the student loan system is unsustainable in the long term. "Recent events in the US show the risks associated with selling off debt and the consequences it can produce in the wider economy," Ms Tumelty said.

The government insists that this will not affect students, and that it would retain control over all interest rates and repayment thresholds. All loans would still be administered through the Student Loans Company, and purchasers will only have information for managing the loans.

 

 

No private company is going to get into bed with this without plans on how to screw as much money as possible out of the students concerned and this is probably why the OFT et al will do NOTHING to Link as it'll mean showing the government screwed up selling our data to these asshats

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 29 last para just a minor details I'd take the "be" out.

 

These letters of yours are absolutely brill. Go knock em dead.

We need to get these low lifes sorted out for good.

 

DG:)

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 29 last para just a minor details I'd take the "be" out.

 

These letters of yours are absolutely brill. Go knock em dead.

We need to get these low lifes sorted out for good.

 

DG:)

 

Yeah I did say originally that these are first drafts just wanted to get them up quickly but thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mwaahahaha can see her wading in and shouting at good old Mr Sell it off Brown NOT.

 

Copies in the post tomorrow to the various parties

 

Actually I take that back she sounds like she might be a decent person after all (apart from voting against the ban on hunting bit that is)

 

I am proudly independent minded and am one of the small number of Labour MPs who voted against a ban on hunting, opposed the war in Iraq, renewal of Trident, foundation hospitals, university tuition and top-up fees, ID cards, and extended detention without trial.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed I am so angry that this whole mess is basically down to the Government making money of the back of other peoples debt

 

Here are some links to show how disgraceful and underhand the government are over student loan debts

 

Mute magazine - Culture and politics after the net

 

Labour gets the varsity blues - Article - TES Connect

 

House of Commons Hansard Debates for 12 Mar 2009 (pt 0002)

 

scroll down the page on that last link

 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/student/news/article1524881.ece

 

and lastly another gov promise broken on student loans, why do we believe anything this shower of tards say?

 

Student loans interest rate inflation promise broken | This is Money

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOS complaint now filled in as well and in the post hehe how many angles can I take them out on at once I wonder...

 

In the what do you expect to be done bit I put sack the woman responsible and I believe some form of compensation is in order due to the amount of time taken dealing with this AND the stress and anxiety caused by contacting the father :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bored tonight so have written to Gordon Brown asking what he plans to do about these companies he has jumped into bed with

 

Dear Prime Minister,

I am writing to you with regards to a situation brought about by your actions of selling student loans off to debt collection companies with an appalling track record of abuses and actions counter to the Consumer Credit Act.

 

Please find enclosed a copy of a letter I have sent to Thesis Servicing AKA Link Financial, I am sure you will be able to see the problem from reading it but just to recap.

 

I have sent my deferment paperwork in every year as requested, since Thesis “acquired” my student loan they have not auctioned my deferment and continually send me template letters to call them, I have written back to them on numerous occasions yet never receive a reply.

 

Thesis then decided to harass my aunt who lives in sheltered accommodation and has many mental and physical health issues, they demand that she pass messages on for which I believe the OFT has already issued guidelines to Link that this is unacceptable behaviour.

 

This was bad enough but then Thesis have phoned up my father with whom I have had no contact for 30 years as my parents divorced when I was very young and he was not allowed access due to fears over my safety. I know Thesis have phoned him because he wrote to me and told me they had been phoning asking about me, I believe Thesis have provided my address to him which would be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 on top of their other unlawful action.

 

I have complained to FOS, OFT, Trading Standards (the OFT recorded my complaint and then passed the details on) and my own MP Norman Lamb and I also wrote to Kate Hoey and Wayne David as Link/Thesis operate in their constituencies and I thought they may also be interested to note their despicable behaviour.

 

I would be interested to know what you would intend to do about this being as it was yourself I believe that originally instigated the mass selloff of student debt to debt collection companies?

 

In the light of this and the many other complaints that I am aware of will you reconsider using student debt to raise funds and furthermore if you do continue to sell the debts off will you reconsider the kinds of company you do business with do you really want your Labour Government to be seen to be working with companies that behave in this fashion?

 

I look forward to your response and I shall also be raising the issue with David Cameron and Nick Clegg to ask for their opinions on the matter.

 

 

 

This is the draft so don't worry about spelling and grammar it's not finished yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...