Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you're set on pursuing the receiver then a complaint to his governing body (if any) might be a sensible low risk first step. You need to confirm what qualifications he actually has. I don't believe an LPA Receiver necessarily needs to be a licensed insolvency practioner, although he may be. Or he may a chartered surveyor. I note you say "LPA" and "fixed charge" receiver, but aren't those two different appointments with different remits? What relevant powers are given in the mortgage terms and security? Or if that's unclear then how was the appointment described to you? Ducking back to the comment I made earlier, you consulted a solicitor who advised a claim against the receiver. How did he advise that you do so?   Some background reading (accepting it's from 2013 and you may be working off more recent preceded overturning this) .. LPA receivers owe very limited duty to borrowers; a reminder WWW.WRIGHTHASSALL.CO.UK As lenders rely more and more on their powers to appoint an LPA Receiver, a recent case has clarified the Receiver’s obligations, both to the lender and its borrower.  
    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Passport Office - treatment of disabled


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My parents have recently applied for new passports - their old one was joint, nowadays you have to have one each.

 

The Passport Office have decided to call my mother in for interview - I spoke to them on the phone today and, despite her being 67, being registered physically disabled and a wheelchair user and having dementia (so she can't speak for herself) they are insisting she go. They will not let my father (her carer) go in her place. The Office is about 15 miles away in the middle of Manchester City Centre with no nearby parking.

 

Despite them applying together for new passports my father does not need to go in for an interview. This is apparently because my mother was named second on the old joint passport (Mr & Mrs), so the Mrs will always have to go in, I assume!

 

They were getting the passports in case she ever felt up to visiting her old schoolfriend abroad, but I don't think they'll bother now, the trip is too daunting for her.

 

Whilst I understand the reasoning re identify fraud etc, surely common sense should prevail at times?

 

Passport office said if she's well enough to need a passport she's well enough to go to office - very understanding! And she isn't actually well enough to go anywhere at moment. It was for future use if ever possible. Plus what is the point of her going if she can't speak for herself? A doctors letter would have confirmed that.

 

Does anyone have any thoughts or has it happened to them?

 

Does anyone know who the best organisation/person to complain to about this is?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend of mine whose son is autistic, he got called in for an interview too. Their GP wrote them a letter saying why he couldn't reasonably attend, they let him off. Might be worth a try. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

MY daughter had to go to America for brain surgery she was unable to talk, hear or see but she still had to have a passport. I would like to see them say that she had to be fit enough to attend interview to require a passport, they are talking rubbish.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replies. It is crazy.

 

Didn't realise either that when the passport office said adults applying for a first passport would have to go in for an interview that actually meant adults who hadn't had their own passports - so anyone on a joint passport, Mr & Mrs, is now classed as a first passport holder!

 

Read somewhere that all these interviews and regional offices have been a total waste of money because despite all this they still haven't refused one passport! So much for stopping identity fraud. Just another excuse to make us pay more and make our lives more difficult.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd make a formal complaint, it really gets my goat when people act with near impunity, especially government organisations.:mad::mad:

 

Ask them for their complaints procedure

IPS - Complaints regarding passports

 

How to Complain

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Slightly of topic but there's the cost as well (I know, I know, if you can afford to travel....) I'm in the process of getting mine renewed and it cost me £72, I only work a day or two a week due to ill health so that's a huge amount of money. I mentioned it to my boyfriend who's Finnish (expecting sympathy perhaps?) and he told me it would cost him only about 25€.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bazooka, that's what I was after - I will complain.

 

Fuzzgin - you are right about price, its almost doubled in the 5 years since they opened all these regional offices that have apparently been a complete waste of money! Think I read that on Guardian website.

 

They announced last week its going up by £5 in September.

 

AND I read in Financial Mail a while ago that they reckon that they will soon be pulling everyone in for interview and price will increase to £150 to pay for it! Mail are saying get your passport renewed now even if its not due for a few years to avoid the interview and doubled price.

 

Suspect we'll be getting a lot more complaints about this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuzzgin - just thought - its not just about travelling. You can't even apply for a job nowadays if you don't have either a passport or driving licence. My friend's 16 year old has to pay £72 for a passport just so she can prove who she is to get a part-time job at MacDonalds! That's a lot of money for a 16 year old.

 

All about identidy cards they are trying to force in I reckon. Big Brother tactics

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say your father is her carer. Does your mother have anybody legally appointed to act on her behalf, such as an appointee or a power of attourney?

 

I ask as if this is the case, she is entitled to have her appointee attend in her place.

 

If she has no legal appointee it is definately something worth looking into if she has dementia. This will enable someone else to act on her behalf in all legal situations - representatives are limited in how far they can go but an appointee is not.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No ErikaPNP, we don't have Power of Attorney - because she doesn't want to admit she has dementia so it would upset her. And as my father is also officially her carer we are usually OK without it. I have thought about it and if anything happens to my father its a route I'll have to go down eventually.

 

I got them to the Passport Office last week and took them in and left them to it - wish I hadn't because they apparently insisted on my mother going in for interview on her own (despite me telling them on the phone she had dementia). My father probably just accepted it and let them do it. My mother ended up upset and in tears because she couldn't remember her postcode so they then had to go and get my father anyway!

 

What a mess. I will complain now. My dad didn't want me to before because he was scared they wouldn't get passports but they came yesterday (3 days after interview). They are elderly and easily frightened.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a shame, it's despicable that people are treated this way, god knows people care more for animals than they do their own kind!

 

Still at least they have their passports, and let us know how you get on with the complaint, they shouldn't be allowed to get away with it.

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...