Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's genuinely amazing how you managed to rebuke pretty much all of my points without giving a single shred of evidence to prove it. When asked for evidence all you claim is that "it's clear cut" but how is anyone here meant to know if you won't show it?   I agree with this. If you can't convince us, how are you going to convince the judges when this inevitably goes to court?
    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

I went BankRupt last week Jul 1st.

Had got nowhere with token payments, the penalty charges kept mounting up, falling further behind.

 

I filled the forms and went to the court, having rung the day before.

I paid the full whack although I think I will try to claim back the £150 discount as I was also on benefits - does anyone know how to do this?

 

My situation was very fluid, lots of stress, new part time job playing havoc with my benefits allowance, plus a house move to pay lower rent.

Then my car failed mot which didnt help my mood!

 

Turned up at court at 8.30 and was 2nd in line.

7 other cases that day, and the previous day they had to turn people away!

 

Handed over money and forms, the judge saw me for 2 minutes, and that was that.

Spoke to Official Receiver on phone, will hear from them, nothing after 1 week so far.

 

So it shows how many people it is happening to.

 

I then opened a basic account with co-op bank. My jod told me my wages may go into my old account as the date for changing details had passed!

That's not good, as that account is frozen and I'll unlikely see much if any of it - they will try to get me paid by cheque.

 

I'll try and keep you all updated on progress.

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heard from OR today, 8 days after the BR.

Have an appointment with them for the 20th. Pain as it right in the middle of a work shift, so will try to rearrange, but the 20th will be nearly 3 weeks already into the BR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

managed to get the appointment with OR later in the day so as not to clash with work, which is great.

have to take statements, cards, cheque books, etc.

She said the meeting had to be finished by 2pm, and since it's a noon appointment, my maths says it's a 2 hour max visit, so shouldn't be too bad.

I have nothing to hide anyway so fingers crossed!

 

I also had a result in that my first wage from temp job was given to me by cheque.

They couldn't guarantee it wouldnt go into my old frozen one, but now I can pay the cheque into my new co-op basic account.

 

That new account didnt take long to come through, basic debit card and internet functions, so us lot going BR these days have it so much easier than even 1 year ago.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gordonb

 

Good to see things are running smoothly for you.

 

Keep us posted on how the meeting with OR goes, it good for others who are contemplating going the BR route.

 

All the best

Link to post
Share on other sites

went for interview with OR on Monday. Main reason it was not over phone was because my work history has been varied, including self employment, so they wanted to go over the details.

Felt like I was repeating the same stuff yet again!

 

She said she would 'write a report'. All seems a bit slow to me, but today marks 3 weeks into the BR, so that's 3 down already.

 

She said they would write to the creditors so that hadnt been done yet, and I have received a couple of default notices.

 

I also took my statements and cut up cards, only to be told they didnt really need to see them! Found that a bit strange, almost as if she a bit unsure of what she was doing.

Also no comment was made about my outgoings claims on my statement of affairs. I don't know if this has to be agreed by OR, or whether it's just accepted.

 

Maybe that will be covered in the 'report'.

 

Oh well, not for me to wonder why at the moment.

 

Also in the middle of house move, so a bit stressed, but pressing forward!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Is there a guide for what to put as outgoings claims?

Are there general guideline figures that work, or is it really an individual thing?

 

I have yet another questionnaire to fill in about them!

 

Still surprised that the OR has not been in touch with creditors, it's now a month since I was BR.

 

Cheers,

Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Filled in income payment order questionnaire.

I shouldnt have probs, as my current job has flexible hours, and is only a 12 week contract.

Therefore my income is unpredictable, a big part of why I am in the position in the first place!

 

I was also asked for last 2 years accounts of my self employment.

Since I am sole trader, I dont have to publish accounts. All I have to do is fill in my tax return, and then inland revenue send me the calculation.

I have sent those for the last 2 years as it's all I have.

 

Weird, since I have signed authority fo the OR to see all my bank accounts and inland revenue details - why they are asking me still seems a bit weird.

 

Anyway I have nothing to hide, so will keep telling them what they ask.

I have no house or assets to liquidate, so early discharge would be nice, but I have suspicious feeling my self employment may be a spanner in the works...

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi gordonb, its goood of you to share your expesriance of br with the rest of us , my wife and myself are going to go br pretty soon, so its very helpful to hear some one else story, we had our own company which went into to involuntary liquidation thanks to the bank, we don't have the accounts for the last two years as the OR who was dealing with it now has all the paper work now, so its intresting to hear what they have asked you for. many thanks for sharing, please let us know how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello blaufin. similar story here, if you need any advice just ask, it can be a bit daunting but its pretty straight forward really. i had a v good advisor who showed me the way through so if you have any issues i could always put you in contact. hopefully you will be discharged in 6 months as you where directors i imagine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello danyboy381, thanks for the offer, i might well take you up on that offer a bit latter on, its been very intresting reading every ones exp of dealing with creditors, i was starting to think i was the only one talking to a brickwall! the bank have been truly awful and bk realy is the only option open to us now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a new question as of today, but first a quick answer about my trading accounts.

 

I sent a letter explaining to the OR that as a sole trader I didnt have accounts, just the yearly letter from taxman after I had sent my tax return, so I sent them those taxman letters.

 

My new question, which hopefully someone can help me with - today I got a letter from OR with an Income Payment Agreement.

 

It's for £50 a month for 3 years.

 

Firstly, I'm a bit surprised as they know I am only on 12 week rolling contract at work, with flexible hours, so my income is variable and unpredictable.

Presumably I would have to tell the OR each month if I no longer had the £50 disposable income they think I will have!

 

Second question - it says that during the term of the agreement, i.e. 3 years, I have to tell them of any increase in income, and the OR may claim any increase for the creditors. That by definition means after discharge.

 

I thought that after discharge I could earn what I wanted and that was that, but this seems to suggest otherwise.

Can someone advise please?

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the OR will take an average over 3 months and will expect you to save up in the good months to pay in the bad months, they will not change it every month but might do every 6 months if you have a general change in income

Link to post
Share on other sites

the OR will take an average over 3 months and will expect you to save up in the good months to pay in the bad months, they will not change it every month but might do every 6 months if you have a general change in income

 

still seems a bit strange since I am only on a 12 week contract.

 

And it lasts for 3 years?

That means my situation will stay the same even after the BR is discharged?

 

I thought once the discharge happened, you could earn any amount, and the debt was cleared?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

still seems a bit strange since I am only on a 12 week contract. - I would speak to your OR again about your contract, they may have misunderstood you when you explained it was only a 12week contract.

 

And it lasts for 3 years? an IPA does last for 36 months even after being discharged

That means my situation will stay the same even after the BR is discharged? until the IPA is completed.

I thought once the discharge happened, you could earn any amount, and the debt was cleared? Not if you are subject to an IPA, basically if you have disposable income of over £99 a month then the OR wants a share of it, anything from 50% to 70% depending how much you earn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Louise,

My disposable income for the 2 months since BR has not been over £99.

According to my expenses claim anyway, but that did include £50 a month for leisure.

 

Maybe I should also ask the OR for a breakdown of how they reached the figure?

 

It could be I should just sign it, it can be renogotiated, but I worry that once signed the renegotiation may be hard!

 

Thanks for the continued advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you, I think once you have signed it I think you will be commited for the 3 years, although my understanding is that if you have months where you have no disposable income the clock on the 36 months still ticks away so you may end up only making a handful of payments, however I feel it is like being bankrupt for 3 years as you have this hanging over you.

 

I would speak to your OR before you sign anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Folks,

I thought I'd update you, since it has nowbeen 3 months since the BR.

 

I wrote to the OR on 2nd Sep about the IPA they had sent me, I told them my contract was only temporary and flexible hours, so was queryng the IPA.

No answer a month later.

 

In fact in the 3 months since BR, I have still yet to have any comment about my expenses claims whatsoever.

 

The contact has been minimal to say the least, and I suspect their office is swamped with work.

 

I will just plod along until I hear further.

 

One downside, my work pays every 4 weeks, meaning 2 paydays in October.

That could present problems when I tell the OR!

 

Will keep you updated on any developments.

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

ok, so BR was 4 months ago now.

Not much change since last month to be honest.

Still no response from OR since I queried IPA.

Still no news about the expenses I put down.

 

I know they must be busy chasing bigger cases, after all the court was turning people away when I went, but I do find that strange.

 

I am also still getting calls from BOS, which I dont answer, and letters from MBNA, still saying they are charging me late payment charges.

 

Is there someone I should be reporting them to for this?

 

Regards,

G

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If they persit, send copies to your IP and report them to TS and the OFT.

 

I've been BR since November 2007 and it's like having a great big weght lifted of my shoulders :)

 

It was also very satisfying because some of the idiots after me said, 'oh but you can't afford BR if you can't afford to pay your alleged debts'. Those comments spured me on and CCCS told me to ask an ex emloyers charity to pay, which they did. The even paid my moving costs and flooring costs when I moved house in June :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...