Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paint is a free programme on any Windows PC. But don't worry, the choice here is not either perfection or nothing. As you say, use your scanner, save the file ... and then use the "choose files" option when you post to CAG to add the file. We can do all the redacting and converting to the correct file type at this end.  The important thing is just to get the info to us. Why not do an experiment this afternoon and see if the above works?  
    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Capital - Rate swaps.


grange1971
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4199 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry Pete I missed this off.

I have copied and pasted some of the text, It claims that the ISDA agreemenet was attached, but it simply never was. unless I am reading this wrong and it is all one document?

 

This Confirmation, together with all other documents referring to an ISDA Master Agreement (each a “Confirmation”) confirming transactions (each a “Transaction”) entered into between us, shall supplemen , form part of, and be subject to, an agreement in the form of the 1992 ISDA Master

Agreement (Multicurrency – Cross Border) (the “1992 ISDA”) as if on the Trade Date of the first

Transaction between us we had executed an agreement in that form but with the elections and

modifications under the Special Provisions and without any Schedule except for the election of English

law as the governing law and of GBP as the Termination Currency. All provisions contained or

incorporated by reference in that agreement upon its execution will govern this Confirmation except as

expressly modified below. As used herein, “Agreement” at any time shall mean the 1992 ISDA this

Confirmation supplements, forms a part of and is subject to (or is deemed to supplement, form a part of

and be subject to, as provided above). In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the

Agreement and this Confirmation, this Confirmation will prevail for the purposes of this Transaction

The 2006 ISDA Definitions are also incorporated into this Confirmation. Copies of the ISDA 1992

Master Agreement and the 2006 ISDA Definitions are attached to this Confirmation.

 

Thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Leeby,

 

Evening Pete, I have made a complaint via telephone
Any complaint should be made in writing, so you have a complete paper-trail.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick, I agree, what I should have said in my post was " I have asked for the correct poeple of whom I can asddress my complaint" I have a paper trail from previous request, I was actually told "there was actually no one I can speak to as such" was the reply.

 

The telephone conversation was merely a point of stating I have a complaint and I want to be emails a person or department for whom I address. You post is noted and fully appreciated. Many thanks.

 

I will explain myself better in futute to casue less confusion :) sorry!

 

Enjoy your day.

 

Leeby

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke to the Information Commissioners advice line today.

 

Sole Traders and Partnerships can obtain info under the Data Protection Act, but limited companies cannot.

 

This leaves limited companies at a disadvantage, however, its not insurmountable, you can still write to Barclays Capital and ask then for copies of documents they hold, but you cannot compel them to supply them at this stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings all.

 

Quick note Leeby.

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2001 section 19 requires that these products should only be aimed at investment professionals. As a sole trader you do not fall into this category. Small piont but very valid under the circumstances.

 

I will be appointed an adjudicator in the next couple of weeks so i will inform you of the dialogue.

 

As you suggested Pete i sent a subject access request. As a limited company i expect no return but i am seeking the relevant documentation.

 

Keep the faith

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Today I have received a letter via courier from the President of the legal team in Barclays Capital. He basically states he has received my letter, and as my complaint is one aimed at a regulated product I am to make all correspondnace directly to him. I also have a meeting at my home this week, two representitives from Barclays. I will discuss the findings above using some of your highlighted points. I have every peice of documentation on file, the only way anything could differ, well I will leave that to the imagination. I went through my statements yeaterday and in 19 months, they have taken 92k payments and interest.

 

I only receive 54k per annum overall into the account. add this to other running cost of the buildings, insurances, repairs, etc this simply makes no commercial sense, No wonder I had to keep ploughing monies into the account. I will update you later in the week. Any pointers other than what I have would be brilliant. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Leeby,

 

Have you considered recording the meeting.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Slick, Thank you for the message, I have considered recording the meeting, but I beleive the law states that I would need to make them aware of this before I could use the recorded data as evidence. alhough it would be good to use the comments in my complaints.

 

As I have been going trough my paperwork and emails, I now have evidence of the commericla manager saying that he would have the building valuation done by a mate of his to get the right value for the building, although that relates to more the commercial loan, it is all a mess if I am honest. maybe this goes on all the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening, I agree as far as not recording the meeting, although I will have a 3rd party present as witness. So I can verify what has been said. Il update you after the meeting. Many thanks for the advice. Oh BTW I have had no reply to my request for copies of docs. Time yet!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Just need to clarify some detail on Barclays compliance forms.

 

Up to November 2007 the forms you need to look for are as mentioned, Agreement for Private Clients & Warrants and Derivatives Warning Notice.

 

From 1 November 2007 there was a change in regs. and the forms were consolidated into the Agreement for Retail Customers, so make sure you are looking for the right forms in relation to your swap date.

 

I am of the belief that the Agreement for Private Clients & Agreement for retial Customers, must both be signed in accordance with the composite mandate, althought he wording on the latter suggests that even if you dont sign it you are deemed to understand it and are bound by its terms. One for the FOS to decide on there, methinks.

 

The warrants and Derivatives Warning Notice clearly states to be signed by all parties to the trade, counter to Barclays view that again it can signed in accordance with the Mandate.

 

Cheers

Edited by grange1971
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid our business too has unwittingly entered into this "Rate Swap". Costs of breaking it are around £600k and this has been added to our total liabilities so that Barclays now consider us "higher risk" and are trying to more than double their margin to reflect this increased risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hi all,

 

Just need to clarify some detail on Barclays compliance forms.

 

Up to November 2007 the forms you need to look for are as mentioned, Agreement for Private Clients & Warrants and Derivatives Warning Notice.

 

From 1 November 2007 there was a change in regs. and the forms were consolidated into the Agreement for Retail Customers, so make sure you are looking for the right forms in relation to your swap date.

 

I am of the belief that the Agreement for Private Clients & Agreement for retial Customers, must both be signed in accordance with the composite mandate, althought he wording on the latter suggests that even if you dont sign it you are deemed to understand it and are bound by its terms. One for the FOS to decide on there, methinks.

 

The warrants and Derivatives Warning Notice clearly states to be signed by all parties to the trade, counter to Barclays view that again it

Edited by jason barr
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jason Barr and James Preston and welcome to CAG. :)

 

Jason Barr - Your post above didn't quote properly from Grange's earlier post.

 

You may want to post again to confirm what it is that you want to say. :)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Hope to have some direction from the FOS on 3 key complaints within the immediate future.

 

If we have any level of sucess, I have been offered the free services of an 'organic marketing company' who have also been shafted by Barclays.

 

They use facebook, twitter, bebo etc to gain maximum exposure, then turn this into a press feature ie a story entitled 'bank treats customers unfairly' probably wont attract much attention, but a story entitled '75,000 bank customers join online protest' would get into the papers as a story in its own right. Social marketing, apparently.

 

Will keep updated when I have progress to report.

 

Regards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To discover I am not the only mug to be sold a wholly inappropriate interest rate swap by Barclays Capital has been a great relief for me!

 

Entering into an interest rate hedge was stipulated as a condition of our loan. I have no experience in these markets and even now I do not understand how I could foreseen/calculated the potential breakage cost which eventually hit us. At no time (even after incurring a significant breakage cost) have Barclays supplied a method of calculation that a reasonably intelligent businessman could interpret!

 

I'm feeling pretty angry about the whole affair which has cost my business dear. I was considering sending a compaint to the Financial Ombudsman but have been told that this approach is unlikely to be successful.

 

Any advise as to the best way to proceed would be greatly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am currently awaiting direction from the FOS - as soon as this is back I will try to offer whatever advice I can.

 

In the meantime....

 

If you are a sole trader/partnership then submit a data protection act request for all data the bank holds on you (for all your accounts with them).

 

This will take a few weeks, hopefully we will have had a response by then!

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ask them for paperwork, in particular:

 

A copy of your Mandate Instruction 9shows who can sign for the company).

 

A copy of the Agreement for Private Clients relating to derivative trades. (Thi must be signed in accordance with your mandate.)

 

A copy of Schedule 1 to the above Agreement, this is called a warrants & Derivatives Warning Notice, and must be signed by each party to the trade (as opposed to the Mandate, which can be sole signatory).

 

You also need to check that their presentation with attached disclaimers was sent to you prior to the transaction taking place - it normally looks like a powerpoint presentation.

 

That should get you started.

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mr Angry Barclay and welcome to CAG.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Pete I missed this off.

I have copied and pasted some of the text, It claims that the ISDA agreemenet was attached, but it simply never was. unless I am reading this wrong and it is all one document?

 

This Confirmation, together with all other documents referring to an ISDA Master Agreement (each a “Confirmation”) confirming transactions (each a “Transaction”) entered into between us, shall supplemen , form part of, and be subject to, an agreement in the form of the 1992 ISDA Master

 

Agreement

(Multicurrency – Cross Border) (the “1992 ISDA”) as if on the Trade Date of the first

Transaction between us we had executed an agreement in that form but with the elections and

modifications under the Special Provisions and without any Schedule except for the election of English

law as the governing law and of GBP as the Termination Currency. All provisions contained or

incorporated by reference in that agreement upon its execution will govern this Confirmation except as

expressly modified below. As used herein, “Agreement” at any time shall mean the 1992 ISDA this

Confirmation supplements, forms a part of and is subject to (or is deemed to supplement, form a part of

and be subject to, as provided above). In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the

Agreement and this Confirmation, this Confirmation will prevail for the purposes of this Transaction

The 2006 ISDA Definitions are also incorporated into this Confirmation. Copies of the ISDA 1992

Master Agreement and the 2006 ISDA Definitions are attached to this Confirmation.

 

Thanks

 

 

HI Leeby,

 

You have been sold this alsmost exactly the same as me - two phone calls, powerpoint presentation, only paperwork was rate Swap Confirmation and NOTHIONG else - no ISDA MAster Agreement NOTHING.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...