Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5437 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

NO.

 

A complaint against a High Court Enforcement Agent needs to be made to the High Court Enforcement Officers Association.

 

Google search will find details.

 

HOWEVER...a word of warning!!! The Association is a self regulating organisation. Up until lthe ast last few weeks the Head of this association was the owner of Sherforce Ltd who are one of the largest High Court Enforcement Companies !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Happy Contrails

The High Court Enforcement Officers Association is a private company, not an industry regulator so complaining to them wouldn't be worth your time.

 

The best route to settle a dispute with a High Court Enforcement Offcier is in the small claims track. https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco/index.jsp The law prescribing HCEO fees for collecting unpaid writs (not County Court Judgements) is Regulation 13 & Schedule 3 of The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004. Broadly speaking it provides:

 

Where the sum due is £100 or less - 5%

 

Above £100 - 2.5%

 

Mileage Charges - 29.2p per mile Max £50

 

Seizure of goods - £2 per site

 

Walking possession fee. £3.25 a day

 

Transport and storage of removed goods "Reasonable costs" Not for gain - See Cullighan vs Marston (bailiffs) Group Ltd. It's probably nil.

 

Valuation of goods - "Reasonable costs" - must be actual disbursements, not for gain.

 

Sale of goods by auction Up to £100 - 15%

Next £900 - 12.5%

Above £1000 - 10%

 

Unlike certificated bailiffs, HCEO's cannot enter a property without permission. They are the same as a common debt collector but with a fancy name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO.

 

A complaint against a High Court Enforcement Agent needs to be made to the High Court Enforcement Officers Association.

 

Google search will find details.

 

HOWEVER...a word of warning!!! The Association is a self regulating organisation. Up until lthe ast last few weeks the Head of this association was the owner of Sherforce Ltd who are one of the largest High Court Enforcement Companies !!

Hi TT

 

I guess this guy is an agent serving on behalf of the Company as he does not appear to be on the HCEO register.

 

I have asked repeatedly since March that I be given details of his certificate and the Court from which he obtained it, but of course this has been ignored.

 

Resulting from a very detailed complaint sent to the Company as a result of information obtained from the SAR they provided, I received a reply which clearly shows they had not even read the complaint in detail for it never came close to answering any of the issues raised.

 

Previous to my original letter of complaint regarding the disgusting threatening behaviour of their agent another party in this matter also sent a written complaint to the Company involved but yet again no reply was received. (all corresondance has proof of posting and in most cases were sent recorded delivery)

 

I also questioned the charges this Company had imposed but as usual they did not even bother to address the subject, however..... following the set aside of the original judgement they wrote and offered to refund £xxxx but did not explain what this amount represented, on reading the letter further it was suggested the amount on offer would hopefully satisfy ALL the issues I had with them.

 

It would have been nice to have the amount on offer since my legal costs (mainly for advice) are eating away at my life savings BUT I will not condone the behaviour displayed by their agent when serving the writ nor can I ignore the disgusting manner in which this Company have handled my complaint and questions and I will most definately not respond to Blackmail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Unlike certificated bailiffs, HCEO's cannot enter a property without permission. They are the same as a common debt collector but with a fancy name.

 

Thanks for that Happy Contrails, does the above mean that he had to ask permission to enter a commercial premises which is freely open to the public. The person in question threatened to smash down any locked door and refused to give any breakdown in the figures he quoted - as if he just plucked anything out of thin air.

 

This was for a CCJ which was transferred up, but then won a set aside as the Claimant had claimed the wrong sum of money (too much) which they were ordered to repay. What now happens to the fees paid to the HCEO.

 

Regards

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HCEOs can enter commercial premises, so if the public are free to walk in, so are they. He did not need to ask for permission. Once entry is gained, bailiffs and HCEOs are free to seize 'goods' and break open locked doors or cabinets, if necessary. So once he gained entry, he had free rein.

I don't know that a small claims court is going to be able to deal very well with the HCEO's behaviour; it sounds like the Association should be the first port of call if the company refuse to respond.

Fees are best recovered via a detailed assessment in the High Court because the small claims court may not the expertise to deal with such matters and also the High Court or Costs Office can decide the fees.

I think the Walking Possession Fee is 25p per day, by the way, not £3.25 per day

I would try the Association first, then the Costs Office but the 'behaviour' aspect of the case may be difficult to prosecute...

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I have said MANY TIMES here on CAG....it should ALWAYS be the case that any complaint should first be sent to the relevant bailiff company to resolve.

 

In many cases we have found that sending a template of your Form 4 Complaint is all that is needed to resolve the issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is correct but it is not the bone of contention.

 

This "HCEO" was given every cooperation during his visit however he behaved to my staff aggressively. I was not at the premises at the time and the person he was seeking was also not on the premises. He was given this information but continued to cause a nuisance. He was also invited to call at the home of the person he was there to see and offered proof the premises he was attending were not those of the debtor. He introduced himself as a HCEO but in reallity he was only acting as an agent to a firm of HCEO's.

 

My staff were not to know this and were given the impression his threats to remove all the stock from the premises carried serious consequences if they did not assist him.

 

I am amazed it will need court time, for what is after all simply the need for someone to wrap him over the knuckles and offer an apology.

 

The debt has been paid the set aside was ordered but the nightmare continues !!!

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"dickhead "you refer to has a name but I have no idea where he came from, going by what I was charged for mileage suggests Newcastle upon Tyne, I am close to court hearing date so will give his initials as DW but will not publish his full name yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea. After courts finished, it'll be great to see this dickheads real name and company details.

 

...maybe his mother realised what vile flesh had just fallen out of her and named him that anyway?:lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...