Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Embracing your unique selfView the full article
    • Hearing held today in court. I attended in person and Evri had an advocate attend on their behalf to defend their position that my contract is with Packlink and not with them. I also provided a copy of Evri's terms and conditions which explains that a contract is entered into when a parcel is sent with Evri. The judge pointed this out to the Advocate and agreed there is a contract between me and Evri under the Ts and Cs. The judge explained that while Packlink are responsible for organising the delivery of the item, it is Evri who are responsible for handling the goods and delivering them, and therefor Evri has a responsibility to handle the goods with reasonable care and skill. So am pleased to say the judge found in my favour. Hearing lasted about 75mins. Evri has been ordered to make payment within 21 days. Also nice to meet @jk2054 in person.
    • Good morning,    I just wanted to update you on the situation.    I have visits piling up with my current employment and they need doing before I finish at the end of this month.  I am moving to Wiltshire in 3 weeks for a new job helping care homes with their Dementia patients. I tried to work it out and at a guess I will be doing about 20-25,000 miles a year. So need a vehicle that can cope with that mileage, my old car would have done it easy but 🤷‍♂️ I have taken out a loan and got a friend to find me a reliable car that can cope with the miles and hasn't been written off in the past.   I phoned Adrian flux to see if I could use the last months insurance on a new car I have bought, the girl I spoke to phoned Markerstudy and asked them but they said no, my new car doesn't have any modifications.    I had an email from someone who saw one of my appeals for information, they live near the site of the accident and know a nearby farmer who has a security camera at his entrance that catches the traffic and specifically registration plates as he has been robbed before. They said they would reach out for me and see if he still has the data. Unfortunately it wont catch the scene of the crash.   The Police phoned me and said they were closing the report I made, even if they found footage of the vehicle at the time I said the actual incident would be my word vs theirs.  My first response was I am sure google maps would show that they turned around at that location which would verify my version of events, but upon reflection I do understand, I have seen people doing make up with both hands while driving, eating from a bowl steering with their knees and veering all over the place. I am sure some of these people go off the road and claim that someone forced them off.    Markerstudy phoned me yesterday to say that my car is now at Copart, the £80 tank of Vpower diesel was emptied on entry to the site for safety reasons, which I get but it sucks.  It is awaiting being assessed and shouldn't be too long, which is a relief.  I am really glad things do not seem to be going the way of the other stories and they seem to moving quickly.   However I was informed that my car was a structural write off before I bought it - this destroyed me, I was almost sick.  and this is going to affect any offer of money - after hearing the first statement this didn't affect me.   They need to wait for the assessor to check it over but it is highly likely to be written off and the maximum they can offer is £2300.  I was desperate for a car as I was working for an agency at the time, no work no pay, and did not do a vehicle check because I didn't know about them.  The seller did not tell me that it had been structurally written off, he told me that it had the front wing damaged while parked and was repaired at an approved repairer.  Markerstudy records state that it was sold at auction, no record of repair at an approved repairer.  I bought it bank transfer with hand written receipt.    It gets worse.    It turns out my airbags should of gone off. For some reason they are not working. I think we can figure out why.  If I had hit that car head on and had no airbags.    Some good news.    I can arrange a time with Copart to go and take my stereo equipment and any personal items that are left in the car only. I cant live without music and need quality sound, my speakers and amps are Hertz and JLaudio, (no I am not a boy racer with booming subs, I am an audiophile on a budget) I was really worried I wouldn't get them back so this is a huge relief for me. It is stuff I have built up over years of saving and collecting. Everything to do with the vehicle and mods I have declared need to stay to be assessed.   The accident has gone as a fault on my record, I have to remove 2 years NCB which means I still have some to declare which is good.  So it appears at this point that it may be resolved quickly, not in the way I was hoping, but not as bad as I presumed it was going to be based upon that tow truck drivers attitude and behaviour and the horror stories I read.   I am not going to buy the car back and try to make money with all the parts on it, I don't have the time or energy.   I may need an xray on my back and neck.  The whole situation has left me feeling physically sick, drained and I need it done.   The lesson learnt from this  -  My conscience is 100% clear, my attitude to safety and strong sense of personal responsibility - A rated tyres even if on credit card, brake fluid flush every year, regular checks of pads and discs, bushes etc, made avoiding what I believed to be a certain broadside collision possible.   Get a dashcam (searching now for the best I can afford at the moment)  -  Research your insurance company before you buy  -  Pay for total car check before you go and see a car and take someone with you if you are not confident in your ability to assess a vehicle.      Thank you to everyone here who volunteers their time, energy and information, it is greatly appreciated.  You helped my sister with some advice a while ago but we weren't able to follow through, she is struggling with long term health conditions and I ended up in hospital for a while with myocarditis, when I got out and remembered it was too late.  I am going to make a donation now, it is not a lot, I wish I could give more, I will try to come back when things are on a more even keel.    Take care
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Compromise Agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5458 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm on long term sick leave and have been offered a compromise agreement/payment. Without going into the details here :

 

1) There's only a short time-frame. I have to give a yay or nay by early July. This is a huge decision for me. If I get advice or try negotiating this will take time - I feel pressurised into making a fast decision. Just not sure if a two/three week decision deadline is usual/normal ?

 

2) I mentioned negotiating but I don't want to do it. I have googled the subject and there are loads of individuals/companies that say they deal with this type of situation . But how do I choose ? Everyone wants your fee and they are all brilliant ( plumber yellow pages scenario ! ). I've no idea where to start.

 

3) I've been offered one year's salary. I don't know if this is a good or bad deal. What else should I consider - pension, reference are bits I've thought of, but what else ?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go on the Law Society website & search for a firm near you that practices in Employment Law & don't forget your employer is required to pay your legal consultation fees - it will or should say this in the agreement - & if it doesn't reject it

 

PS only a qualified practicing lawyer or suitably trained current union rep can advise you on a compromise agreement anyone else is not indemnified to pay damages should you sue them for negligence

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks JonCris

 

I've already (over this weekend) done that and bookmarked a list of local solicitors that 'have a banner' that includes employment law. What I need is a magic wand to know which are the good ones !! Ain't going to happen is it ....... I'm just going to have to pick one and hope !

 

My employer will pay a fee (legal cost) but it's conditional on the compromise agreement being signed. Atm it's here .... this is the agreement .... get it checked over. What I want/need is a specialist solicitor to talk me through what else could be expected, whether the ££ is good/bad/improvable etc, and then negotiate (if my employer will). So this or revised agreement may never be signed, in which case I'm stuck with the legal fee.

 

Maybe I'm wittering. I'd just feel more confident if I knew what deals other people had struck so I'd kind of have a benchmark. Plus if other people had agreed early retirement/pension deals .... anything really. I've been researching all weekend on the internet and there's just not much information on the kind of deals that have been made. Maybe because compromise agreements are usually confidential. But it makes it difficult for me to judge .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as they would like to they can't insist they'll only pay if you agree or more importantly your solicitor agrees with their offer. 1st that would mean any legal advice could be challenged as being biased as they are trying to tie the hands of the lawyer & 2nd it would leave you in an impossible position to either except or be saddled with bill of about £250

 

Contact them & tell them their proposal to pay your fee only if you agree is unacceptable & grossly unfair

Link to post
Share on other sites

JonCris, I'm not sure.

 

Current situation - here is an agreement - we will pay £ for you to get independent legal advice - result you sign or don't (and if you don't we might or might not cover fee)

 

My preferred route - Use the employer's independent legal £ offer - go to solicitor, say is it good/bad? can you negotiate better/add-on's/early pension etc - have solicitor negotiate with employer (don't know if they will though ). It might all come to nothing ie they won't negotiate or offer sod all extra - in which case I don't accept.

 

Do you reckon they should still pay my legal fee ? I just think they're offering on the basis of what's on the table, not for a series of negotiations. I'll admit I know damn all about how this all works which is why I'm struggling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can insist you seek legal advice in fact they have a legal duty to see you do otherwise the agreement is invalid - what they can't do is make payment of the fee a term of settlement - suggest you speak to a solicitor

 

In which area of the country do you live?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ZZ

 

Joncris is correct in what he says. A comp agreement will be invalid unless you have taken ind legal advice.

 

If the sol is doing their job properly, they should advise you when you see the agreement. If you then walk out of that consultation w/o signing the agreement, then it is likely that the sol would breach SRA rules to insist on any payment.

 

I have done this kind of thing for a living for a while now and personally have seen clients come back more than once with c/a's and the only charge made by the partner or fee earner was the amount specified in the c/a and of course the fee note was always sent to the employer not the employee.

 

Thus, don't worry too much about the fee issue, take the c/a to a sol, and feel under no obligation to sign then and there if not happy.

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

ZiggZagg,

 

I was selected for Redundancy earlier this year, given my profession this rather put me in a position as to what I refer to as 'at the the point of no return'. So I turned the tables and went down the route of a 'Compromise Agreement'. I discussed some loose terms with my then Employer and got a draft agreement emailed through. I then went to see my longstanding personal Solicitor and spoke with the employment law specialist (Given the economic situation he had already done a dozen or so such cases this year - this was only February!) The meeting was MOST productive and lots of revisions made in my favour - especially tax liability wise.

 

I would heartily recommend this route, if your departure from your employer is likely. My employer would only pay £250 plus VAT (Not much!) However, I ended up paying much the same as well, but the Solicitors advice and the revisions he made to the draft more than covered this.

 

Pick a local Solicitor that you wish to deal with NOT an anonymous internet name!

Link to post
Share on other sites

my mum has just recently been through the same thing and despite a verbal agreement with her employer to pay up to £1000 solicitor fees when the compromise agreement came through the fee contribution had gone down to £250!!

 

She was also initially offered 2 months notice pay but was not required to work (her contract was only 1) as well as £X payment.

 

When her solicitor tried to get more her ex boss became a real hard ass and removed all the extras he had put in above what was the bare minimum in her contract - so she came out about £4k worse off and stuck with a solicitors bill of another £550 on top of that her employer paid!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks all - you've given me a bit of confidence.

 

Plan is this - I need to speak to my employer next week anyway in response to their letter. I'll play it by ear, indicate I'm not against the idea in principle but I'm not overwhelmed by the offer put forward. If they are agreeable I'll take them up on the legal advice offer, have a solicitor review it, get some advice, and respond after that. Also ask them to extend the deadline because I'm not going to be rushed with this decision.

 

Does that sound ok ?

 

Just saw Andie's post - get them to confirm in writing they will cover £x of the legal fee whether I go through with the compromise agreement or not.

Edited by ziggzigg
Link to post
Share on other sites

The standard charge is £250 which is more than enough to advise on a compromise agreement as it probably represents approx 1.1/2hrs work - this does NOT include any fees incurred for negotiating a better deal which are the liability of the client

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

What trade or profession are you in ZiggZagg?

 

My Solicitor INSISTED that the reference that my Empolyer would give in future was agreed then and the wording incorporated in the Compromise Agreement. I ended up writing my own reference and my employer just agreed it. Many clauses protected my then Employer i.e. That I would not make disparaging remarks about them, disclose the real reason for leaving etc., my Solicitor INSISTED that these were reciprocated in my favour.

 

He also had the negotiated lump sum treated as redundancy/severence pay to reduce the tax liability

Link to post
Share on other sites

The standard charge is £250 which is more than enough to advise on a compromise agreement as it probably represents approx 1.1/2hrs work - this does NOT include any fees incurred for negotiating a better deal which are the liability of the client

 

I'll have to risk it - pick up the excess if there is negotiation which doesn't produce an acceptable agreement. But I'll have to tell the solicitor up-front if it goes past ££, that's it. I can't afford to pick up a huge bill (especially if this doesn't work out).

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Helfortd states the reference AND confidentiality are essential parts of the agreement - you don't bad mouth them & they promise not to bad mouth you

 

As an aside as a result of recent case law there is some thought that such agreements are no longer lawful if when applying for another job they force the concealment of the reasons why an employee has left their former employer - particularly if the reason not disclosed has some bearing or effect on the capacity to do the job

Link to post
Share on other sites

What trade or profession are you in ZiggZagg?

 

No offence Helford but I'm not going to say - bit paranoid in case someone from employer recognises me.

 

Btw I'm a zigg not a zagg :):)

Link to post
Share on other sites

'I'm a zigg not a zagg'

 

So you are!

 

Position on your profession understood. I only asked as the old issue of Restrictive Covenants arises if you are sales/customer facing orientated.

 

H

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...