Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CL Finance - Howard Cohen - CCJ HELP


oneahead
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

I have today received a response from CL Finance to a cca request. They state that the original creditor HSBC have advised them that the original debt is an overdraft and exempt from Part V of the act and that no formal credit agreement exists.

 

I have 100% never had any overdraft from HSBC although i may well have had a loan;).

 

What step should i take next??

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

Account in dispute letter has already been sent. The reply was that it is an overdraft but this is not true. I need to know what to do next.

 

Dont pay them/ignore them....they will issue a court claim, you defend properly....they lose, end of

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

As pgh said, send hsbc a sar.

 

There has been another case I've heard of in the past with hsbc closing a loan account down, transferring the balance to a current account and thereby creating an overdraft and then coming after the person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have now received the Subject Access Request from HSBC. CL Finance have quoted the debt as an overdraft complete with my old sort code and current account number. The SAR proves that no such overdraft existed but that a loan was written off to Metropolitan DCA. There is no default notice in the SAR from HSBC to myself or NOA to Metropolitan. My understanding is that CL Finance must have bought the debt of Metropolitan but i have no correspondence to back this up and honestly cannot remember the sequence of events.

 

Where do i stand and what should my next step be:idea:

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Urgently need advice on this one. Howard Cohen has applied for a CCJ and court forms have arrived. These are the facts:-

 

  • Originally HSBC debt and defaulted in 2004.
  • Debt sold to CL Finance and token payments made since.
  • Subject Access Request sent to HSBC earlier this year.
  • CL Finance stated that debt was overdraft on current account.
  • Subject Access Request confirms no overdraft existed (but a loan did;))
  • Account is in dispute
  • I have no NOA

What should my next step be???

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome

 

Can you post up the POC?

Who is the claimant?

Is address different for correspondance?

What is the date on the court papers?

Did you get copy of original loan agreement?

Any PPI or Charges on it?

Was account in dispute when sold to CL?

Did you get a DN?

Anything you can scan/copy to your thread will be of great assistant to everyone.

DG:)

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

POC - The claimants claim is for the sum of ****** being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a regulated credit agreement between the defendant and HSBC under reference ******* and assigned to the claimant on ********* notice of which has been given to the defendant.

The defendant has failed to make payments in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to Section 87(1) of the consumer credit act 1974.

 

 

The claimant is CL Finance Ltd.

 

CL Finance have corresponded twice, both addresses are different to that on the court form.

 

I have had no contact from Howard Cohen other than their name on the court form.

 

No copy of loan document. Ceased payments after no proof of debt was received.

 

Court papers dated 22nd June.

 

Originally defaulted in 2004 and do not know if DN was received.

 

 

There was PPI on loan but only a few full payments were made before default.

 

Hope this helps. Should i CPR and if so who??

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do the dates and amounts on the POC tally?

In your SAR did you request a copy of the agreement as well?

So you never received a DN to your knowledge and no copy with included with the SAR?

I am assuming the account was already in dispute with HSBC before it was sold on to CL because they should not have sold it on while the account was in dispute.

Did you write to CL and inform them that the account was in dispute?

I think the CPR is the next step to take, however, I am sure someone with more knowledge than I have will be along over the weekend and offer further assistance. I am not sure which is the correct CPR to send as there is 31 and 18 I think, so please hang fire with that until the weekend is over.

You will need to acknowledge service you can do that on line following the instructions on the papers I am assuming this has come from Northampton although you dont have to do that immediately and I am assuming you are going to defend all.

I do not have a great knowledge regarding loans so someone with knowledge on this is needed.

DG:)

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

My main concern is that they quote my old bank sort code and account number as their reference for an overdraft debt. As i have never had an overdraft on that or any other account and can prove this, how can they possibly get a CCJ?

 

I have had and defaulted on a loan with them.

 

Where does this leave me and how do i defend?

oneahead

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT Guidance is clear that all collection activity should be suspended whilst a dispute is investigated.

 

However, since Cohen has already brought an action, you can detail the dispute in your defence, and mention the breach of regulatory rules. I'd report them to TS/OFT as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My main concern is that they quote my old bank sort code and account number as their reference for an overdraft debt. As i have never had an overdraft on that or any other account and can prove this, how can they possibly get a CCJ?

 

I have had and defaulted on a loan with them.

 

Where does this leave me and how do i defend?

 

This should be another string in your bow for your defence.

 

DG:)

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR to the bank would be useful whilst preparing your defence- some important information there (and hopefully some that is not

i dont see how this can be helpful?

 

You have, unless extensions are agreed 28 days to file a defence with the court

 

so a DSAR takes 40 days minimum

 

if you need information to defend the claim you need either to make an application to the court or to make a formal request pursuant to CPR 31.14 and follow up with an application if the 31.14 is ignored,

 

waiting for compliance with the DSAR is not an option unless you want default judgment

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont see how this can be helpful?

 

You have, unless extensions are agreed 28 days to file a defence with the court

 

so a DSAR takes 40 days minimum

 

if you need information to defend the claim you need either to make an application to the court or to make a formal request pursuant to CPR 31.14 and follow up with an application if the 31.14 is ignored,

 

waiting for compliance with the DSAR is not an option unless you want default judgment

i wasnt aware they could use 31.14 against HSBC as it is not they who are claiming against him!

 

I thought SAR was 40 days maxiumum not minimum and i personally haev had them back in as little as two weeks

 

i presume he will not put in his defence until the last minute- what has he got to lose?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...