Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • JK: Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have. Thanks DX, I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest 'CCJ' letter re Cap1 debt - Northern Ireland


theshuffler
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5376 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 210
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Right folks i recieved this from Capquest this morning , Note the dates that they have provided as they might be a source of amusement.

 

Dear Sir With reference to your letter dated 23 june 09 , i can confirm that the balance relates to a credit card . This account was opened on 19 th Dec 2008 .

Please note that legal action was issued on a balance of £299.99 , in the Northhampton County Court under claim number ************ on 1st Oct 2008 and judgement was entered on 22nd June 2008 . ( yip they are a wily lot these capquest people, they took me to court before i opened the alledged account ! crystal balls perhaps ). To minimise costs the remaining balance was not litigated on but remains due and payable. Any further information or assistance call us on *************

 

Yours sincerely

***************

legal support associate

 

 

My thoughts are 1 To point out the discrepancy in the dates of the alledged debt and see what they come up with or 2 Point out the fact that N.C.C have no juristiction in Northern Ireland . I have never had an address in England so they cant get me on that one.

 

I still havent requested proof of any debt as yet i thought i would keep that untill they started to loose the rag a bit .

Link to post
Share on other sites

To minimise costs the remaining balance was not litigated on but remains due and payable. Any further information or assistance call us on *************[/color]

 

Yours sincerely

***************

legal support associate

 

 

 

I don't know which is funnier......that,or the dates

 

what a bunch of cretins

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe they get their letter writing ideas from watching Minority Report.

 

I have a few debts with capquest that I'm currently fighting and live in NI. I wonder if I'll get one of these too!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You couldn't make it up, could you? I suspect that the inconsistency of the dates will be put down to an admin error, but the whole thing stinks of utter incompetence and casts doubt upon the veracity of anything they say.

 

Why not send something like this to their Compliance Manager:

 

 

Dear Time-travellers

 

I refer to your letter dated (date), sigend by XXXXX who is apparently a 'legal support associate'. No debt is acknowledged to you or any company you claim to represent.

 

I confess to being somewhat puzzled by the content of your letter, and would be grateful if you could clarify the following points for me:

 

1. You state that the alleged debt relates to a credit card, which account you state was opened on 19 Dec 2008, that your claim was issued on 1st Oct 2008, and that judgement was entered on 22 Jun 2008. I require you to explain how Capquest have apparently managed to gain judgement prior to the issue of a claim that itself was issued prior to the issue of the credit card.

 

2. You state that the claim was issued in the Northampton County Court. Since I am resident in Northern Ireland, the English Courts have no jurisdiction. I require you to explain why your action was brought in the wrong jurisdiction, contrary to the Practice Direction. I note that bringing or threatening to bring action in the wrong jurisdiction is considered an unfair practice under the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection, and require your explanation for this as well.

 

Be in no doubt that your abuse of the legal system and failure to comply with regulatory rules is an extremely serious matter, and calls into question your fitness to hold a Consumer Credit Licence. Accordingly, I will be sending details of your non-compliance to the Office of Fair Trading and Trading Standards. I am also asking my Member of Parliament to look into the matter and raise the subject of your behaviour with the relevant minister.

 

You should treat this letter as a formal complaint, which I require you to deal with through your complaint procedure, a copy of which you should send to me without delay. By way of resolution, I require you to ensure that the judgment you obtained through abuse of process is set aside at once, and I require your proposals to compensate me for the damage to my credit file and the stress and anxiety caused by you.

 

Your response is required within 7 days.

 

Yours etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are a complete bunch of idiots. Go for the jugular shuffler. There are plent of Norn Iron Folk on here who have received SDs from this shower of shine. Definately get your MP involved. That is a great idea. Crapquest are already on the OFT Radar so just illumuate the target again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name Address etc

 

Dear Miss *********

 

Firstly may reiterate that i do not recognise any debt to you or any company you claim to represent , secondly i would like to congratulate your company on its vision and the go get them attitude that it has adopted in issuing litigation against people in advance of them actually taking out an alledged credit agreement . In your letter you state that the alledged debt is for a credit card and that the account was opened on Dec 19th 2008 thats a full two months after the shambolic issue of a CCJ in a court that has no juristiction in Northern Ireland . Now im sure that you being a legal associate were quite aware that a CJJ issued in Northhampton against a person who lived Northern Ireland was against the regulations set down governing CCJS issued in the NCC, in respect of the fact that the address supplied to the court was outside England and Wales. Given the size of your company and the might of HL legal im sure that this fact is common knowledge within your system , but not withstanding this your company decides to push the litigation through in order to try and use it as scare tactic in pursuit of alledged debts in Northern Ireland. In your previous letter dated 16th June 2009 your company also issued threats of Court Bailifs visiting my home , again with the size of your company and the might of HL Legal im sure that you are well aware that there are no Bailifs in Northern Ireland and you are using that fact as a secondry scare tactic . Given that the CJJ against me was issued illegally i respectfully ask that HL legal go back to Northampton and have it removed from my credit file . Meanwhile i will be passing on a copy of your letters to the OFT with regards to your threats on the back of a wrongly issued CCJ .

 

Not the finished article as yet but was thinking along those lines , however as usual i appreciate any advice and constructive critisisim

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what is going in the post thanks to scarletpimpernel . Should i await their response before sending my complaint to OFT

 

Dear Ms doo lally

I refer to your letter dated 30th June 2009, in which you state your designation as a 'Legal Support Associate'. No debt is acknowledged to you or any company you claim to represent.

 

I confess to being somewhat puzzled by the content of your letter, and would be grateful if you could clarify the following points for me

 

1. You state that the alleged debt relates to a credit card account, which was opened on 19 Dec 2008, and that your claim was issued on 1st Oct 2008, and judgement was entered on 22 Oct 2008. I require you to explain how Capquest have apparently managed to gain a Judgement against me, two months prior to any account being allegedly opened?

 

2. You state that the claim was issued in the Northampton County Court. Since I am resident in Northern Ireland, the English Courts have no jurisdiction. I require you to explain why your action was brought in the wrong jurisdiction, contrary to the Practice Direction. I note that bringing or threatening to bring action in the wrong jurisdiction is considered an unfair practice under the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection, and require your explanation for this as well.

 

Be in no doubt that your abuse of the legal system and failure to comply with regulatory rules is an extremely serious matter, and calls into question your fitness to hold a Consumer Credit Licence. Accordingly, I will be sending details of your non-compliance to the Office of Fair Trading and Trading Standards. I am also asking my Member of Parliament to look into the matter and raise the subject of your behaviour with the relevant minister

 

You should treat this letter as a formal complaint, which I require you to deal with through your complaints procedure, a copy of which you should send to me without delay. By way of resolution, I require you to ensure that the judgment you obtained through abuse of process is set aside at once, and I will await your proposals to compensate me for the damage to my credit file and the stress and anxiety caused by you.

 

Your response is required within 7 days.

 

Yours sincerely

Edited by theshuffler
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am considering texting my local paper to see if there are many locals getting harrased by this shower , get a list of names and reference numbers together and make a big complaint to both capless and the oft . Would this be wise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am considering texting my local paper to see if there are many locals getting harrased by this shower , get a list of names and reference numbers together and make a big complaint to both capless and the oft . Would this be wise?

 

Count me in and I know there are others on here too from Norn iron who have had dealings with these ganches

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can just imagine that Gerry and the Shinners would love to help you with this case especially the business with an English Court being used to try to enforce a claim against someone from Northern Ireland or the Six Counties as they refer to

:cool:He hasnt gone away you know

:cool:

 

 

GULPIN - Now theres another great word

  • Haha 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah i think i might contact my local councillor ( when i find out who he/she is ) and put the wheels in motion . Though i expect Capquest to come back with the old admin error , just thought it would be nice to collect some more admin errors from other people to back up the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Councillors deal with local issues; get in touch with the Shinner's constituency office direct.

 

It will be helpful if you write out a brief diary of events, with bullet points and dates, and a summary of what you would like the outcome to be. Include the point that you understand from your research that Capquest have a reputation for this sort of thing, blaming 'admin error' when caught.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sure the Shinners will be familar with bullet points...

 

Yeah, dont even think about a councillor- its Gerry or your MLA you should be talking to about Capquest.

 

 

I would love to be fly on the wall when Capquest gets a wee letter from Sinn Fein!!

 

Dear Capquest,

 

We think this situation requires meaningful dialogue, failing that one of our authorised field representatives may pay you a wee visit...

 

We know where you live and we havent gone away.

 

Sláint, Gerry

Edited by noomill060
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sure the Shinners will be familar with bullet points...

 

Yeah, dont even think about a councillor- its Gerry or your MLA you should be talking to about Capquest.

 

 

I would love to be fly on the wall when Capquest gets a wee letter from Sinn Fein!!

 

Dear Capquest,

 

We think this situation requires meaningful dialogue, failing that one of our authorised field representatives may pay you a wee visit...

 

We know where you live and we havent gone away.

 

Sláint, Gerry

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...