Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC being Awkward


skeeks
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5380 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

I am having problems with HSBC at the moment - due to dire changes in our circumstances OH & I have been advised to concentrate on paying our priority debts each month since April. We have sent pro'rata payment proposal letters along with a statement of our incomins/outgoings & unsecured debts to each of our creditors - some of which have been accepted so far & we've gone ahead and made the payments to all of them in the meantime to show willing.

 

I have an HSBC credit card, overdraft and personal loan.

 

HBSC are being really difficult with the credit card account (no reply from loan or overdraft) saying that the proposal is unacceptable. I replied using the follow-on template for such an eventuality. Rec'd reply yesterday stating that they are proceeding with normal collection procedures DCAs etc. :mad:

 

If I make a CCA & PPI request on loan and c.c. will this make matters worse - although how I can't see...? Also would a SAR cover both of these eventualities? What kind of timescale am I looking at in needing to make these requests? I would be hoping in the case of PPI to make a hardship claim and believe we would meet the criteria from what I've read here.

 

The PPI was definitely mis-sold as I was working as a temp with erratic hours at the time c.c was granted & despite numerous requests over the phone to cancel the PPI on the credit card over the years was advised that it could not be cancelled (as recently as 2007). Looking back at old financial statements re: a previous HSBC loan taken out & cleared, I discovered had the loan insurance loaded as a single payment from my current account while in that same job.

 

Sorry to be so long-winded - I'd really appreciate any help out there please...

 

Thank you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi skeeks , welcome to the forum :)

 

I would say that your best approach at the moment is to send a SAR for everything - it's your right under the Data Protection Act and it will help you to see where you are at . It also puts your account 'In Dispute' which means they can't (or aren't supposed to :rolleyes:) pass your account to a third party i.e. DCA etc.

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/110--data-protection-act-1998-subject-access-request-

 

However , if you get a letter from a 'DCA' called Metropolitan Collection Services , - don't panic - it's only another branch of HSBC using different headed paper ... :)

 

When you send the SAR specify which documents you specifically want , as well as anything else they hold on you (or they'll use it as an excuse to send bits and pieces ) .

 

They have 40 days to produce this information under the DPA , so it should give you breathing space to regroup ......

 

Also there is a great PPI forum on this site with a lot of knowledgeable people on it - probably best to address your PPI queries to them ...... before and after you get your SAR stuff.......

 

oops sorry - had a break in transmission ....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/payment-protection-insurance-ppi/

 

By all means come back and ask any timer you have a query , someone will answer , and we're user-friendly ........ :grin:

Edited by johnnymitch

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Johnnymitch, thanks for your reply.

 

In terms of specifying the SAR documents I'll need - can I simply ask for every shred of info they hold for me accross all 3 accounts (loan, cc & overdraft) or this that too ambiguous and will they take advantage (as if!).

 

Apologies for needing to be spoonfed - I'm new to all this and don't want to mess it up...

 

Many thanks

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's OK skeets - we've all been where you are at some time..... :cool:

 

I would list the important ones you need and follow by saying - 'and anything else you hold on me ..... '

 

You could adapt a bit of this one (for DCAs) :

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca.html

 

If you read the instructions which come with the SAR link I gave you earlier it should give you a good idea of what to ask for .......

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh , and a SAR covers everything and every account - all for the one tenner .......:D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lovely - so your saying that SAR will have the same function as a CCA reuqest or rather will let me see if they have one and therefore whether or not to request one - am I correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spot on - :) if it doesn't come with the SAR - send a CCA to specifically ask for it ..... or , if you want it quicker (a CCA gives them 12+2 days to produce whereas a SAR gives them 40)

 

Have a look at my post on laura 58 s thread ||:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/204849-confused-bank-charges.html

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JohnnyMitch

 

Just read the other post - thanks for pointing me to it. Does the SAR put the account into dispute from the time it's received by them or when the 40 days are up?

 

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically , I think the 'In Dispute' starts from when you send them a Prelim(inary) letter asking for your money back - because until you get your sar stuff you can't say there is evidence to dispute anything.....

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understand what you're saying...

 

I thought though that in terms of evidence for unfair charges it was enough from my statements to challenge they've been unfairly overchageing me (esp. First Direct current account £25 for going pence over my OD limit - forgot to mention that one) in addition to HSBC current account.

 

Also evidence-wise, the HSBC credit card - my circumstances when I applied for the card indicates that the PPI was mis-sold... I've placed a thread in the other forum, so you needn't address that. But do you see what I'm getting at - is my impression of what constitutes evidence irrelevant until I get the SAR?

 

One other thing if I may?

 

Is there any conflict between requesting a refund of charges and at the same time doing a CCA?

 

Really appreciate your time with all this :)

 

S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understand what you're saying...

 

I thought though that in terms of evidence for unfair charges it was enough from my statements to challenge they've been unfairly overchageing me (esp. First Direct current account £25 for going pence over my OD limit - forgot to mention that one) in addition to HSBC current account.

 

If you've already got access to all the statements you need e.g. online or downloaded , then you can just list those and send off a Prelim asking for them back - that's when the 'In Dispute' begins- IMHO :)

 

Also evidence-wise, the HSBC credit card - my circumstances when I applied for the card indicates that the PPI was mis-sold... I've placed a thread in the other forum, so you needn't address that.

Well done !

 

But do you see what I'm getting at - is my impression of what constitutes evidence irrelevant until I get the SAR?

 

The SAR may also uncover other evidence of mismanagement of your accounts ........ which you may want to pursue ......

 

One other thing if I may?

 

Is there any conflict between requesting a refund of charges and at the same time doing a CCA?

 

Absolutely not - the CCA is for details of a Credit Agreement/Loan not refund of current account charges ........

 

Really appreciate your time with all this :)

 

S

 

Not a problem skeeks - you have one or two issues - therefore you need to address them separately at the moment ....... :cool: take it a step at a time - you'll get there ..... but if you've got enough evidence to start a claim for refund of charges - then go for it !

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Johnnymitch

 

Had to wait until end of month (payday) to put requests in. However they've sent me a letter of default dated 18th June recieved by me on the 22nd June with a deadling of the 2nd July - just 14 days. I presume that I should continue making the pro-rata payments which they've declined until I see evidence of a CCA?

 

A bit confused over the default notice & how to proceed...

 

Any advice appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha! They've done it again skeeks :lol:- forgotten that the 14 days runs from a presumed delivery date of 2 working days after dispatch of the letter - so I make it that they've given you only 10 days which nullifies their default ------

 

2. Practice Direction

 

Service of Documents - First and Second Class Mail

 

"With effect from 16 April 1985 the Practice Direction issued on 30 July 1968 is hereby revoked and the following is substituted therefore.

 

1. Under S7 of the Interpretation Act 1978 service by post is deemed to have been effected, unless the contrary has been proved, at the time when the letter would be delivered in the ordinary course of post.

 

2. To avoid uncertainty as to the date of service it will be taken (subject to proof to the contrary) that delivery in the ordinary course of post was effected:-

 

(a) in the case of first class mail, on the second working day after posting;

 

(b) in the case of second class mail, on the fourth working day after posting.

 

"Working days" are Monday to Friday, excluding any bank holiday.

 

3. Affidavits of service shall state whether the document was dispatched by first or second class mail. If this information is omitted it will be assumed that second class mail was used.

 

4. This direction is subject to the special provisions of RSC Order 10, rule 1(3) relating to the service of originating process.

 

8 March 1985

J R BICKFORD SMITH Senior Master

Queen's Bench Division

 

In fact in your case this makes it even more out of order skeeks- you received it on 22 June which is the second WORKING day after dispatch (there was a week-end in between ) - therefore your deadline date should have been 14 days from 22 June , which I make 6th July (the 5th being a Sunday).

 

I would write to them - tell them that because you have not received your CCA this account is In Dispute until they produce it - that because of this they may not issue a default notice, therefore they must withdraw it and confirm this in writing .

 

(I don't think I'd point out at this stage that the default notice is flawed - keep it up your sleeve for future ammunition /evidence of their incompetence ) :D

Edited by johnnymitch

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello again

 

Unbelieveably I've spent most of July playing letter tag with HSBC about my signature - the Postal Order is looking tattered at this stage from all the 'oh yes you will/oh no we won't'...

 

They're trying to fob me off and of course have long missed the CCA request deadline - what should be my next move - a Dispute Letter?

 

Really appreciate any advice please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS - I should say that the Postal Order is currently back with me - ought I re-send it back to them again before I can write to them stating the account is now in dispute & has been for a number of weeks?

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi skeeks - I would say that the fact that they've sent your PO back does not absolve them from having to comply with your CCA request. But , until you get the CCA or they fail to produce it .... you can't say that the account is 'In Dispute' . ... because you don't know if there's anything wrong with it .

 

I would send back the PO . with a covering letter something like :

 

CCA Call-up letter

Reference ....... (your letter of xx xxx xx)

I am disappointed that you have failed to respond to my request for a copy of my Loan agreement to which I am entitled under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79). A copy of this letter is attached for your convenience.

I have previously enclosed a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act. You have returned this to me , however this does not absolve you from having to comply with the CCA request which I made earlier . It is returned to you herewith .

I understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days. This period has now passed ......

I am sure you also understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

Failure to respond positively will be reported to the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Office of Fair Trading.

 

Yours faithfully

 

You could add :

"PLEASE NOTE that unless otherwise stated by yourselves and if the above documents are NOT provided, it will be CONFIRMED that you are unable to reproduce/provide in any way shape or form any copies of the above requested documents. You are reminded that you have a duty to inform me if you do not have the above documents. This is confirmed in High Court Law - Ezsias v Welsh Ministers - [2007] All ER (D) 65 (Dec) "

 

 

Whilst you're waiting for a reply to this ,skeeks it might be worth your while to look at lee32uk's thread ..... because the court route might be your next mocve to get them to produce or deny the existence of the CCA .

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/188794-hsbc-cca-non-compliance.html

 

It's a big thread but has a lot of useful info in it .... but of course come back and ask if you need more help ... :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...