Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX 2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.   Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is it good news?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys just wanted to find out if I am getting ahaead of myself here and if anyone else has been in the same boat.... Basically CCA'd all my creditors, never recieved a single CCA from any of them, so sent them the account in dispiute letter, I have a response here from one DCA who own my debt, but I dnt knw whether it is good news or not......

 

"We are following up your request for the origignal agreement and statement of account with our client. When these become available we will forward a copy to you.

 

Whilst we may not be able to enforce the agreement, the monies remain outstanding. The agreement or any monies paid has not been made illegal or void because of our clients current failure to supply a copy of the original agreement".

 

 

Any advice guys.....?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also remind them that as they themselves agree the alleged debt is not enforceable & that by continuing to process your data you will consider that they are attempting to enforce the agreement contrary to the rules

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok guys, the DCA involved here is DLC, and it has now been 3 months since I CCA'd them and i that time letters have gone back and forth between myself and thm and still no agreement, the most they ever wrote to me was to say that while the debt is not enforceable without the agreement the debt still exists, they have stopped all collections activity on the account, however, I keep getting letters saying they are still chasing up the agreement with the original lender etc and they will be in contact in 21 days.....!!! In my opinion it's been 21 days too long!!! I really want to settle this debt with a very very very small percentage of the balance, I don't expect the whole thing to be written off, shall I just go in all guns blazing and say something like:

 

'If you or your client did have the agreement you would have been able to produce it by now, your non-compliance with my CCA request leads me to believe that you or your client do not infact hold a copy of the required agreement, therefore, to save time and costs, please accept £XXX as a full and final towards the alleged debt and wipe all data from my CRA' etc etc......

 

Also have sent in SAR to the original lener with whom I held two acounts, one for a credit card and the other for this loan, they responded by sending me info for the credit card (agreement, statements, customer services notes etc) but nothing for the loan, have written back stating SAR response incomplete around the 15th June, but I did'nt recieve anything back from them, not even an acknowledgement letter, after speaking to their cust services, they advised me to write to a diff add, which I have done but I'm not sure what to expect...

 

(sigh!!)

 

Any advice please caggers...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

'If you or your client did have the agreement you would have been able to produce it by now, your non-compliance with my CCA request leads me to believe that you or your client do not infact hold a copy of the required agreement, therefore, to save time and costs, please accept £XXX as a full and final towards the alleged debt and wipe all data from my CRA' etc etc......

 

 

I would wait up on that - if there is no agreement, why pay them anything?

 

If they continue to mess you around on the SAR a formal complaint to the lender regarding lack of compliance, followed up by a complaint to the FOS. (Which are disgracefully slow but will do the job.)

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really want to get out of this mess I'm in at the moment, the money I owe to banks, I never spent in the first place!! I got ripped off by a scheming ex...!!! My family have agreed to help me out, but I dnt wnt to waste any more of their money, hence the offer of F&F.....

 

I hear what your saying babybear and cashins, but if I was to go in and make the offer and they rejected it even though they don't really have a leg to stand on, what if any are the implications that I face should they take me to court??

 

Im just tryng to think of the worst case scenario here....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Always A Call 3 Months We Have Heard Of Cca Turning In A Year.

 

So They Have Default On Your Cca And Of Course You Know That You Do Not Have To Pay Them.

 

So What To Do.

 

1 Do Not Pay Them Wait Till Have Cca Keep Money Store Away

 

2 Offer Ff Now

 

3. Take Them To Court

 

4. Stop Paying And Offer F/f/

 

Well I Would Offer F/f 20% On The Normal Conditions

 

Hope It Helps

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really want to get out of this mess I'm in at the moment, the money I owe to banks, I never spent in the first place!! I got ripped off by a scheming ex...!!! My family have agreed to help me out, but I dnt wnt to waste any more of their money, hence the offer of F&F.....

 

I hear what your saying babybear and cashins, but if I was to go in and make the offer and they rejected it even though they don't really have a leg to stand on, what if any are the implications that I face should they take me to court??

 

Im just tryng to think of the worst case scenario here....

without a valid cca they cant take you to court so you can put your mind at rest here...also if you do go for a f&f make absolutely sure you get the whole thing in writing..black and white..never deal with em over the phone they will only deny it later

Link to post
Share on other sites

without a valid cca they cant take you to court so you can put your mind at rest here...also if you do go for a f&f make absolutely sure you get the whole thing in writing..black and white..never deal with em over the phone they will only deny it later

 

sadly, they CAN take you to court without an agreement and indeed some do, and try to persuade the judge (sucessfully sometimes) that a microfiche copy of what the agreement would have looked like is sufficent

 

In this case they have sent absolutely nothing in response so he needs to build a case showing that he has made every effort to try and get them to provide the agreement so that he can make an informed decision

 

Yes if he likes he can sit back and whistle dixie all the time they remain in default but he need to record the fact that he has gone out of his way to try to resolve the matter whilst they have done nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly, they CAN take you to court without an agreement and indeed some do, and try to persuade the judge (sucessfully sometimes) that a microfiche copy of what the agreement would have looked like is sufficent

 

In this case they have sent absolutely nothing in response so he needs to build a case showing that he has made every effort to try and get them to provide the agreement so that he can make an informed decision

 

Yes if he likes he can sit back and whistle dixie all the time they remain in default but he need to record the fact that he has gone out of his way to try to resolve the matter whilst they have done nothing

 

Ok, so in terms of doing absolutely everything to get them to produce a CCA, I have written countless numbers of letters during the past three months, what esle is there that I can do to get them to produce the CCA? Would court action be my next and final step step? If so, where and how do I start? Or is there anything other then this that I can do, as I would much prefer to settle without the courts...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys, is it worth me sending this letter, or should I take it straight to courts or make offers of f&f??

 

I write in reference to the above mentioned account.

It has now been 3 months since my initial request for a copy of the original consumer credit agreement relating to the above account.

Given that the Consumer Credit Act states that you must provide a copy of a consumer credit agreement within 12 days, I feel that 3 months is more then sufficient time for you or your client to locate the agreement concerned.

Your failure to provide me with the agreement can only confirm my suspicions that you or your client do not hold a copy of the concerned agreement, therefore making the debt completely unenforceable at law.

Given that you have made several attempts to recover the agreement from your client, and that the problem may indeed rest with your client and their filing system, I am prepared to give you a further 14 days from the date of this letter, to provide me with a copy of the original consumer credit agreement, with the prescribed terms and conditions as required at the time the agreement was taken out.

If you are unable to provide me with a copy of the agreement within the next 14 days, or confirm in writing that you or your client do not hold a copy of the required agreement, my only option is to escalate this dispute and allow for the courts to settle the matter.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

why don't you try this one first- it will put you in a very strong position (especially with regard to any possible costs issues if you do have to take them to court)

 

personally if they did not respond to this one i would THEN try a F & F

 

 

I refer to the above matter and your failure to supply legible documents*(or whatever the alleged failure is )in response to a s78 Consumer Credit Act Request or to provide a true copy of a properly executed credit card agreement.

 

We appear to be at loggerheads in this matter, and clearly you remain in default of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 on this matter.

 

The original properly executed credit card agreement is the document that you would need to produce in support of any county court action against me , and the same document that I would make a court application for you to produce if you failed to respond to such a request under a CPR31.16 prior to my seeking to commence proceedings against yourselves.

 

It would therefore seem to me to be entirely in line with the overriding principles of the CPR for us to make every attempt to settle matters outside the court system .

 

In furtherance of this objective therefore, I would suggest that this matter can be disposed of without further delay by you allowing me to inspect the original properly executed credit card agreement . Thus the matter can a be resolved one way or the other.*

 

Normal convention requires that any such document is inspected in situ- I am prepared to travel a reasonable distance to inspect this document.

 

Alternatively I am prepared to pay the reasonable costs of having this document couriered to the local branch of Barclays Bank*(or wherever)*for me to inspect it there

 

I can think of no valid reason, if it is your sincere desire to have this matter dealt with without further delay, why you should not accede to this request. Since clearly if you satisfy me that you do have a properly executed and enforceable agreement then i can immediately enter into discussions with you with regard to discharging the said debt, which is surely what you are trying to achieve!

 

If however it is the case that you do not possess a properly executed agreement then it would be the better for all concerned for you to admit to this fact now and then we may be able to negotiate a mutually acceptable outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...