Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • so return of goods order etc etc read upload  scan pages to jpg, redact in mspaint. the convert to and merge to one mass PDF  read upload and use the online listed sites for all 3 stages. do you want to keep the car? i will guess this was a manual paper claimform direct from the co.court or was it org sent from salford bulk processing and has just got reaq ssigned?      
    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue –  29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached  2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00. The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month. 3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement, Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us. Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement 9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate 4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:- a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement  number xxxxxx. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     The total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by First class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges 5.  At the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage. Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024  What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg  
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA (CMEC) bullying tactics


Redletter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5125 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello. Apologies if I am in the wrong place with this. I'm not sure if anyone can deal with this at all?

 

I have recently been approached and assessed for child maintenance by CMEC (Child Maintenance Enforcement Commission), formerly the CSA.

 

I must point out that I have always paid towards my children's upbringing, but my ex got greedy despite already defrauding the benefit system and not declaring any money I gave her in the past, but that is another story which I will not enter into.

 

The question is with regard to my child maintenance payments.

The CSA as it was previously indicated that THEIR preferred method of payment is Direct Debit. However I argued that it was my banl account and I wanted to retain control. I am not disputing payment - simply the method of payment. They reluctantly agreed after passing it to a manager and I set up a standing order.

However, since the new lot took over (CMEC) they have said that the only methods of payment available to me are either Direct Debit or an attachment of earnings, which I obviously do not want!

 

My view is that they are there to enforce payment of what the law says I must pay not to dictate how I pay it!

 

What are my rights on this?????

 

Thanks

Redletter

 

 

'I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair - I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I posted in the wrong place but had no replies?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/200727-csa-cmec-bullying-tactics.html

 

Thanks

Redletter

 

 

'I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair - I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was me, I would just continue to make the standing order payments. They are still getting the money at the end of the day. You really would think that they would use their energy in chasing absent fathers that refuse to pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like everybody else, I agree that as long as you pay and it's on time they have nothing to complain about.... What if you didn't have a bank account?

What would they do then?

 

You could always offer postal orders! ;)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to the problem by beloved ex has now appealed against a recent reduction in the amount they are taking from me, despite the fact that I provided evidence of a substantial decrease in my wages!

It is not good enough that CMEC themselves have re-assessed me because she somehow believes she should be entitled to more, despite the recession and that fact that there are people being made redundant at my place of work!:mad:

 

(Rant over! Thanks!)

Redletter

 

 

'I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair - I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to post #8;

 

As stated above CMEC have now confirmed that my ex has indeed lodged an appeal against my recent re-assessment and subsequent reduction in the amount I have to pay.

 

The CSA originally bypassed me and went directly to my employer obtaining wage slips directly from my employer for Oct & Nov 08. At this time I had earned a substantial amount of overtime and their original assessment took an average from these 2 months.

 

I informed them that this was unfair as the amounts earned were not a true reflection of my typical average earnings.

I advised them that due to the following reasons it was inevitable that my earnings would decrease substantially over the coming year:

 

1) I had increased my persoanl pension contribution from 7% to (what I believe to be the CSA's maximum allowable) 20% of salary.

 

2) I had reverted to using my company van for personal use, resulting in a reduction in my PAYE coding and an increase in the amount of tax paid, as due to their demands I could no longer afford to run my own car.

 

3) I sent them a copy of a memo to all employees from my employer advising of sanctions upon the amount of overtime available and cutbacks due to the present economic climate.

 

4) I enclosed a letter from my employer detailing my wages (Gross minus tax, national insurance & pension) for Jan & Feb 2009 during which I had earned considerably less as I had previously forecast.

 

The CSA accepted my evidence, re-assessed and reduced the amount I had to pay, including an additional reduction due to overpayment at the original rate.

 

However, my ex (as I expected), despite the current global recession and the fact that people are being made redundant all over the world, has appealed against the reduction.

 

Now the appeals department of the CSA or CMEC are asking once again for me to provide evidence, most of which the CSA already have in my file.

 

They have requested details of my earnings from Oct 08 to Feb 09, despite the fact they have already received details of Oct 08, Nov 08 from my employer and Jan 09/Feb 09 from me (letter from employer as they had already lost my wage slips!).

 

They want details of bonus & commission from Oct 07, despite the fact that the ex didn't claim until 24th Nov 2008.

 

They want details of the date from which my pension contributions increased.

 

The main grievance I have with them is that it has already taken them 6 months to sort out the amount I presently paid. The paperwork I forwarded to them went from Middlesbro to Belfast and then to Sussex before they eventually located it.

I have, by their own admission, already overpaid based upon the re-assessment.

 

I have annoyed my employer by asking them to take time out and prepare the letter confirming my wages for Jan & Feb 09. The office are already on a 4 day week (as are the factory), and as such they have said they do not have the time to keep taking time out of their regular workload to provide the CSA with these details over and over. My employer has already asked for voluntary redundancies from all departments and my continuous requests are clearly causing them inconvenience and annoyance, as a result I feel I am making myself stand out and moving myself toward the top of the redundancy pile!

 

Additional to this the CSA are still phoning and trying to get me to set up a direct debit despite previously agreeing to standing order payments.

 

I have now advised my employer that if CSA or CMEC make further enquiries they should quote the Data Protection Act and advise them that they do not have my permission to pass on my personal information.

 

Is there anyone out there who can advise me of my rights?

The law states that I must pay 20% of my nett wages for 2 children, no more , no less. But if they calculate based on previous earnings I will be paying more than the law requires!

Redletter

 

 

'I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair - I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires!'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I had a similar dealing with the CSA. After continuously paying them their calculated amount without any qualms, I did write to them advising that it was costing me a fair amount every month in travelling for contact (640 miles a month). They said they would re-asses it, and in doing so go in touch with my ex. She claimed that I have never really had contact with our child, and as such the CSA threw my claim out whilst advising me of the same.

 

After that - I never bothered writing back to them. Even though now I have court orders that provide for contact (as short as they are). Yet again, another classic case of father who wants contact, mother won't allow it and of course the courts take forever to sort anything out, yet the CSA are quick off the mark to get your money.

 

and wait for it.. the best part being, since the RP is on max state benefits, your money doesn't even get to your child, instead the govt keeps it!

 

Rant over.

 

RedLetter - I will be interested to know what happens, good luck - i've subscribed to the thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

hello i wonderwed if any 1 could help me.

 

my ex has got the csa involved and i needed some advice. i used to work at a company and the csa took money straight from my wage and it was £25.43 a week and this went on for months and months. I have recently changed employers and when i have phoned them to start the payments again they have told me my previous employer was supposed to take £40 a week not £25.43. When i rang the csa all i had was a load of attitude off someone and all they tried to do was try and blame me. The serious part now is im in £1199 worth of arrears. Now they have told me that they want £62 a week off me to cover my son and my arrears. Im only on £200 a week and my rent and council tax alone is £100, which once they take the deduction from earnings i will have £38 a week to buy gas, electric, water rates, £15.50 travel expenses to work and food for me and my son.

 

as you can imagine it is impossible to live and the csa have said there is no way of changing it. I am not entitled to any tax credits things like that because i am only 24 years old.

if any1 has any advice i would really appreciate it

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i'm a woman in a man's world. I let my childen live with my ex husband a year after we split up and he has hounded me re maintenance ever since. He earns approx £30,000 a year and I earn much much less and struggle to keep a roof over my head. Also he has alienated the children, so as well as paying £450 (some of this is arrears too) a month I don't even see the boys. In my experience the CSA hold all the cards. I have no answers for you. I have been advised to give up work etc, but I want to work and need to work to support myself. The CSA are totally unsympathetic to the parent living without their children and do not care one jot about their circumstances. I have no issue in paying maintenance, however, the 20% (plus arrears) makes it very difficult to support my general living expenses.

Because you work, they can always claim directly from your earnings. The way I see it, it is a no-win situation. I'm just sorry I can't be more positive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi, this is how it worked for me, several years ago:

 

Immediately that they started claiming the money, they asked for a cheque, otherwise they would claim it from my employer.

 

I had a form to fill in, I can't rememebr the name of it or anything now, but I filled it in, and posted it to them, with the cheque. Now listen to this:

 

After logging the information given to them on the form, and confirming they have received the form, and used its contents (where i lived and worked etc.), they DENIED having received the cheque (even though it was in the same envelope).

 

The first I knew of htis (because they NEVER tell you anything, they just "act"), was when my employer told me he would nwo be taking 30% of my wages form me (it used to be 30% for 2 kids). Basically, they lied about receiving the cheque and IMMEDIATELY took it form my wages (I presumed they had received the cheque and would cahs it because it was in the letter - oh abnd they DID confirm by phone, receiving the letter and the cheque, then later on denied the phone call).

 

When i tried to appeal to their better nature, I found they didnt have one. When i asked for a second chance, they said no. These peopel are hideous vampires, who get paid more money, if they suck more money out of you. They break any rule, if it profits them to do so, and care nothing about your wlefare, or your life. If you hung yourself, they wouldnt care because 99.97% of people DONT hang themselves, and do carry on paying - its a numbers game, to them, and the way to get the most money, is to do exactly what they do do, and terorrise any man who's wife sees profit in throwing him to the vampires.

 

Because only 1.37% of men are affected (or whatevr they amount is), they KNOW that no revolution will take place over this, and most people will simply laugh at you, if you go down the pub, moaning about the csa. So there is no stopping them.

 

This is why, nowadays, i laugh and cheer when i see 20,000 peopel being made redundant, on the news - im GLAD because not one of those people had any siympathy with me, and the csa ruined my life. Its made me bitter against all men, because they laugfhed at me, so i now laugh at them.

 

They even got £1,700 for my boy when he was 19 yrs old, and working, on the basis that "I didnt inform them in writing", even though i had no idea i needed to - they'd stopped claiming when he was 17, but just popped up and opened a new claim, it seemed. And the local magistrate doesnt care a crap about you either, and just says "passed".

 

Unless the men of this country learn tot stick togetehr, regardless of the issue, these romans will always pick off small parts of our communites, and ruin as many lives as they can, fo rtheir own profit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...