Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks London  if I’ve read correctly the questionaire wants me to post his actual name on a public forum… is that correct.  I’ve only had a quick read so far
    • Plenty of success stories, also bear in mind not everyone updates the forum.  Overdale's want you to roll over and pay, without using your enshrined legal right to defend. make you wet yourself in fear that a solicitor will Take you to court, so you will pay up without question. Most people do just that,  but you are lucky that you have found this place and can help you put together a good defence. You should get reading on some other Capital One and Overdale's cases on the forum to get an idea of how it works.  
    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
    • Here's a suggested modified version for consideration by the team. (Not sure whether it still gives too much away?)   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you added. Shall we raise the related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding parking periods. Especially with no consideration of section 13 in your own trade association's code of practice and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked, unmanaged over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the above issues and more, with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture a couple of useless ANPR photos. If you insist on continuing this stupid, money grabbing quest, after having all of the above pointed out, we will of course show this letter to the Judge and request “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Signed, "Spot". (Vehicle Keeper's pet Dalmation).
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice on Extended Probationary Period/Rights in Case of Dismissal?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5467 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

This is the first time I have posted on here and would welcome any advice as I am concerned about my husband's future position with this employer. Sorry if I waffle on a bit.

 

Am worried about hubby's job.

 

Well it all sounds a bit dodgy all round to me... Hubby started a new job on 1st October last year (3 month's after he had been made redundant) with a 6 month probationary period. Then they brought a new bloke in 3 weeks before his probationary period was up who is (apparently) over hubby - they never told hubby about this or anything and of course he got quite agitated by this new bloke telling his staff what to do because he didn't know that he (as Manager) and his staff were reporting to this new bloke instead of the M.D. now (severe lack of communication within the company). So him and this new bloke didn't exactly get off on the right foot.

 

The new bloke was the one that requested a 2-month extension on hubby's probation saying that he had 2 months to improve in these four various areas or he could face dismissal. Anyway, they seem to have got a better working relationship now but everything seems to land at hubby's feet. Anything that goes wrong, it's his dept's fault - every time.

 

Can they just extend his probationary period just like that?

 

They also don't get paid overtime but get time off in lieu - except one chap (hubby has two staff under him) has been there 3 years and already run up about 200 hours overtime and the company are getting on to hubby's back about it saying that he needs to reduce staff hours but still get the work done (when he has a project list as long as his arm) - this was part of the requirements within his new probationary period as well.

 

So it's almost as if he is being penalised for the hours that this lad ran up before hubby even started there. He's been told to sort it out. He suggested they pay him for the overtime up to the end of last year and then start afresh, but they won't have any of it. He's got to get this lad to take some time off (which they can't afford to do time-wise) or come up with another plan.

 

But every problem there is it always seems to be his dept's fault because all the printing stuff runs on computers and if the computers go wrong then everything goes t*ts up but there is just no respite at all. Like yesterday, he had to do an office move, but had no instructions as to what to do, not even a rough sketch. He was there till 7pm last night doing what he thought was right (which meant he didn't get home till 8pm so saw the kids for about 30 minutes yesterday) and apparently it was wrong anyway so he was having to re-do it this morning - another example of the bad communication but you can bet your life his dept will get the blame.

 

Even I have been applying for jobs just in case he loses his job (seeings as everything seems stacked against him) - even some woman who has come from a European branch (who we think is the MD's bit on the side) to help out for a couple of months has been slagging hubby off behind his back apparently.

 

Anyway, he was supposed to get a Probationary Period Action Plan and didn't get that, and he was meant to have a catch-up/progress meeting with his "new" manager at the end of April and that didn't happen.

 

Trouble is, we didn't have job loss mortgage insurance when he got made redundant last year so I was determined that when he got a job I would make sure we took it out, but because he is on a probationary period nobody will cover for it anyway. He's too much a "high risk" at the minute. So if he loses his job, we've got about 2 months to find another one (with the money we have to manage on) else we're going to be in dire straits and to be perfectly honest, the worry is keeping me awake at night.

 

I can't help feeling that he's been made a scapegoat for all the company's uselessness and I'm not sure if they can just extend his probationary period just like that?

 

Sorry I've got side-tracked a bit and just wondered where we stand. He's been there 8 months at the end of this month.

 

Any advice welcome.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There

 

In respect of probationary periods, the company can and does have a right to extend a probationary period if the employee does not meet with their expectations of the role. This issue does happen and happened to me.

 

You mention that a manager was brought in over your husband and no details were advised? This is very unusual and your husband should have been advised of this.

 

Most companies always want hours reduced and more output, that's a fact of life and when you're in a managerial position, its up to you to try and sort it out. Has your hubby put forward any plans to his new manager to source this reduction?

 

You see, your husband has to be seen to be doing everything to the best of his ability, which is also strained by the fact that he is still on probation.

 

Did your husband ask for a plan for the office move? Most departments who want their office moved or changed around expect a plan and usually the manager who is doing the move does the plan and then the department fiddles about with it until they are happy with it.

 

I would definately suggest that your husband goes to his manager and asks for the probabtion action plan and again asks for a meeting with his new manager for a catch up and progress meeting.

 

I'm really sorry that I can't help any better than I can, this is due to the probation issue.

 

One other alternative, is for your husband to start looking for another job whilst he is still in the one he's in now - then he has a bit of time instead of having the extra worry of being unemployed.

 

I do wish you all the best and let me know how you get on as I can understand that this is a very stressfull and trying time.

 

Heb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

Thanks for your reply and for clearing up the matter on the probationary period extension. What happened with you? Were you able to maintain your role after your extension?

 

I'll try to clarify:

 

Yes, they brought a new Manager in over my husband but he was never told about this, which as you can understand got my husband agitated when the new Manager came in and started telling my husband and his staff what to do.

 

My husband has put forward a plan to sort the problem of hours out of the lad who works for him (My husband is IT Manager and has two staff - he has also requested more staff as three people is just not enough to cover the workload they have - they cannot let him have someone permanently full-time but are sending people for 2-3 weeks at a time from their European office to work on specific IT projects to help lessen the workload).

 

He suggested that the company pay the young lad up till the end of last year for the hours he is over but they won't. He has been put in an impossible position. I for one cannot understand why the company let this lad run up his hours so much in the two and a half years prior to my husband starting with the company. Now I feel my husband is being penalised for this?

 

As far as I am aware my husband IS doing the job to the best of his ability, but is being set impossible targets such as the matter of reducing staff hours when the workload is beyond belief.

 

As for the office move, he was just told he'd got to move the Customer Service Manager's desks/computers and that was it and he was told he'd got to do it that day (you see, again, severe lack of communication within the company) and wasn't given a plan at all.

 

He only has one week left now before he finds out whether or not he keeps his job so not sure that the probationary action plan which he should have got at the beginning of April will be much use. And he has been applying for other jobs, but obviously with things the way they are at the moment, there isn't an awful lot about and so many people are applying for the same job it's not easy.

 

Thanks for your reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Thanks for the info.

 

Yes, I was taken on permanently after my extended probation - I was then promoted to a senior person within the team as I proved myself to be very valuable - the only reason that my probation was extended was because some a***hole decided he was going to cause ructions but he was proved wrong and he left shortly after.

 

Anyway, lets get back to you.

 

I'm glad to see that your husband has put forward his plan of action and that some people are coming in to help - regardless of where they are from, the company has acknowledged that there is a problem with work load and have allocated resources to help.

 

Because of this, the company will therefore have probably said to your husband that because he now has help to lesson the load, the staff member with the hours must take time off to recoup the hours overtime in lieu.

 

I'm not quite sure why your husband would be required to move desks being that he is in IT and would only be required to move the computers and install the necessary lines. Usually facilities sort out the moving of furniture.

 

Although the team member with the hours has racked all these hours up, and probably the previous manager couldn't cope which is why they employed your husband to sort out the mess that's been left behind but if he could sort it out, then he would be worth his weight in gold but its a slow process.

 

What I can't understand is that when you rack up overtime lieu in hours, you have a time limit in which to take them - I do understand your frustration about why the company has left it this long to sort it out. Would your husband be best in contacting HR to see what they can do about the hours?

 

I do believe that your husband is doing everything that he can with the mess that he's been left with but again, because of the probation thing, it all boils down to his meeting that he has next week. Once he is taken on permanently, then it could all change rapidly.

 

Hold on as best as you can and I do give you my full support.

 

Heb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

 

Thanks for all your help on this. Unfortunately my husband had his meeting yesterday and his employer decided that, following his extended probationary period, they were no longer going to continue his employment and he was to have his employment terminated with immediate effect.

 

The reason they gave was that he did not meet the Action Plan that he was given.

 

Now, when he had a meeting to extend his probationary period in March, he got a letter saying that he would get an Action Plan. He got the Action Plan on Friday last week. How was he meant to have fulfilled the criteria of the Action Plan in the space of what was basically 2 days?

 

I understand that unfair dismissal can usually only be undertaken once an employee has been there for 1 year or more, but there are exceptional circumstances. I am not sure as to what is classed as an "exceptional circumstance".

 

Do you think it's worth us looking into it?

 

Thanks again for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I'm really sorry to read about what has happended to you are your hubby.

 

We have recently been through a similar situation and I am afraid that under 1 year of employment there is nothing that can be done by way of unfair dismisal. The only way you could bring a claim was if your hubby had been discriminated against in some way, such as due his race or sex, but that would be a claim for discrimination, not unfair dismisal.

 

I do realise it appears unfair and unjust but my advice would be to move on and put this horrible event behind you both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...