Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • IMG_2820-IMG_2820-merged.pdfmerged.pdf Case management was this morning. Here is the Sheriff’s order. Moved case forward to 24/05.   He said there was no signed agreement and after a bit of “erm, erm, yeah but, erm” when he asked them, he allowed time for sol to contact claimant.  what is the next step now? thank you UCM  
    • I've had a quick (well, quick for a thread of this length),  read of this thread and to be honest I'm struggling to make heads nor tails of the actual crux of the issue here. You seem awfully convinced that whatever is going on is worth the fight and the odds are in your favour but with how the thread has gone it seems that one trail goes cold so you simply move on to another in an attempt to delay the inevitable. All it does is end up digging holes and confusing others and yourself which means any advice given to you is completely pointless. I note that for the life of this thread there has not been any documentation or correspondence uploaded for people to have a look. Have you got any that you'd be willing to redact and upload for members to assist you? Right now, it seems people are shooting out advice while being in the dark because it's starting to become very difficult for people who weren't here at the start of this (including myself) to follow along. Right now, this whole thread is just hypothetical "He said, she said" and is going nowhere fast. Nothing more than basic advice can be given which, as you've sought out some legal advice, is likely not sufficient to actually come to any sort of conclusion. I, personally, am starting to agree with others that it may be best to consider bankruptcy and put the matter behind you.  
    • Thanks for coming back to us. There are no guarantees - but remember that so far MET have not had the guts to put even a single case before a judge.  Not once. Yours is one of seven court cases. Three ongoing like yours. In two MET bottled it as Witness Statement stage approached. In one the allocating judge decided their Particulars of Claim were rubbish and threw the case in the bin. Just the one victory by MET by default when the motorist stupidly didn't file a defence. So there is every chance that MET will throw in the towel in your case too if you stand firm. Please keep us informed of what is happening. Regarding being abroad, that is no reason for things going wrong, you can request an on-line hearing and we've had several cases where the PPC gave up when the motorist moved abroad. But please keep us in the loop.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Overdraft Debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am looking for some advice i left uni about 9 years ago, i had racked up a 2200 pound overdraft debt. I am living in Gibraltar (British Col in shouth of spain). Over the years i have paid 50 pounds here and there, i havnt been consistant and obvioulsy i have been gaining interest as the months pass by. Now i am unemployeed and i have started to get threatening letters off them saying that it has been passed onto the debt collection people, interest has taken the amount to 2300 and of course this will increase every month.

 

What is the worst that can happen if i dont pay them, can they get to me in Gibraltar? Mate of mine says they have no juristion in Gibraltar and he doubts they would take any kind of action over 2300 pounds.

 

Not quite sure what to do and would apreciate any advice

 

Thanks in advance

 

Jacks:idea:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, As I see it Gibraltar is a British zone (hence GBZ on the NO.plates) And the British bobby who no doubt still walks the beat down there? Mind you that was when I used to drink in the wine bar and then end up in the 'brass house' a little 9x9 metre square drinking hole in the back streets with a DJ and three records!

I digress:cool:

 

It would be my opinion that Gib has the same reciprocal arrangements as does mainland UK regarding DCA's etc, except the DCA's in Gib probably carry guns:eek:

 

You say that these debts were from 9 years ago?

Who are the letters from? Are they Glasgow based? UK based? Gib based?

 

What bank is your debt with? Have you opened another account with a different bank? If not do so.

Was the debt generated in a mainland UK bank, not in Gib?

 

Once you have a seperate bank account set up, then send whoever it is that claims you owe this money too, a CCA request.

 

However make sure you send everything by recorded delivery, don't speak to the clowns over the phone, I was going to say monkeys, but there are hundreds of rock apes their!:D

 

If it is 9 years old, you can safely say they will not have a copy of your original CCA, and therefore you can safely stop paying them until they do come up with one.

P.S. Don't sign your CCA request or any letter to them for that instance:cool:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I should of mentioned before, the debt is an overdsraft from a bank in Britain (Kingson to be presise) I am now residing in Gibraltar (and no Gibraltar does not have exactly same law as UK)

 

mate of mine had this to say to his collector (debt orginated with Barclays)

 

"threatening me with legal action is not a viable option as i reside outside of the EU and the United Kingdom and I am pleased that you informed me that you have worldwide field representatives however please provide me with evidence that they have jurisdiction or a legal status in the area that I reside."

 

This was writternt to the follwoing debt collectors

 

Collections Department

REGAL CREDIT CONSULTANTS LTD:idea::eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

(and no Gibraltar does not have exactly same law as UK)

"threatening me with legal action is not a viable option as i reside outside of the EU and the United Kingdom and I am pleased that you informed me that you have worldwide field representatives however please provide me with evidence that they have jurisdiction or a legal status in the area that I reside."

 

The law of Gibraltar is a combination of common law statute, and is based heavily upon English law. and

The English Law stipulates that, English common law will apply to Gibraltar unless overridden by Gibraltar law.

 

Gibraltar enjoys a special relationship with the European Union. Gibraltar is within the European Economic Area. The legal system is based on the common law and statute law of England and therefore embodies the advantage and security of British company and trust law. As well as the security of a legal system based on the common law and statute law in England, Gibraltar's lawyers and accountants are trained in the United Kingdom.

 

Sorry to burst your bubble:eek: well your mates to be precise.

Fore warned is fore armed, gibraltars constitution & legal system.

 

If it is RCC have a browse for them on here, but IMHO they don't look anything to be worried about. As I suggested your best bet would be to send them a CCA request.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would strongly recommend you google the name Mary Elizabeth Croft and you can get further info on how to deal with debt letters. Below is from her book which will help you.

 

Whenever you receive a demand for payment from a Bank, Building Society, or Loan Company, all you need to do is to respond correctly, the drift of which is to request them to provide three things:

1. Validation of the debt (the actual accounting), and

 

2. Verification of their claim against you (a sworn affidavit or even just a signed invoice - signed is important!), and

 

3. A copy of the contract binding both parties.

 

Write to say you would be happy to pay any financial obligation you might lawfully (important word!) owe as soon as these three documents are received.

 

They can't validate the debt because they never sustained a loss.

 

They can't verify any claim against you - as a flesh and blood human being with a living soul - they will be attempting to talk to your legal fiction NAME.

 

They can't produce a copy of the contract because a lawfully binding one doesn't exist.

 

What exists is an unenforceable unilateral contract.

 

What they refer to as 'your contract with us' is not a valid, bilateral, agreement - since the four requirements of a lawful, binding contract were not met on the Credit Card (or whatever) 'application', namely:

 

1. Full Disclosure (we are not told that we are actually creating the credit with our signature), and

 

2. Equal Consideration. They bring nothing to the table, hence they have nothing to lose. ("Consideration" means 'something of value', e.g. money, or an item of value - something they are trading for your signature/promise - something they have to lose), and

 

3. Lawful Terms and Conditions (they are based upon fraud), and

 

4. Signatures of BOTH Parties/Meeting of the Minds (Corporations can't sign because they have no Right, or Mind, to contract, because they are soulless legal fictions)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...