Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome picks another victim


rob20042513
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5032 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To add to what WBDFS said, part 31 is the main part of the CPR that you can use.

 

Mainly it refers to documents mentioned in a statement of case and gives any party the right to inspect documents mentioned in the case of another party.

 

To use part 31 to get documents otherwise, you have to use part 31.16. To do this you have to make an application to the court (using a form N244 available from Her Majesty's Courts Service - Home) which costs £75. If the application is successful, the court will issue an order instructing the other party to let you inspect the document(s) you applied to see.

 

I have jsut done this and got such an order.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey very shrewd!!!!!!!

 

Let me play devils advocate here:

 

1. Welscum cannot produce the agreement, what happens?

 

2. Welscum do produce the agreement, then what happens?

 

3. Mine and Wanabedebtfreesoon little secret as well to add to the mix

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey very shrewd!!!!!!!

 

Let me play devils advocate here:

 

1. Welscum cannot produce the agreement, what happens?

Not an awful lot really, if there's no agreement they can't take you to court to enforce it. So they get to spit and hiss but there's not a lot else they can do :D

 

2. Welscum do produce the agreement, then what happens?

You know the agreement is fatally flawed so then you share it with everbody on cag and the above answer also applies. Or you can take them to court on a number of issues eg. unfair relationship, unfair terms, unlawful recission of contract and the list goes on....:grin:

 

3. Mine and Wanabedebtfreesoon little secret as well to add to the mix

Add the answers to 1. and 2. together and you have an excellent case :D

 

Well if they think they can screw up and treat people like dirt then we all have to join together to fight back for the rights to which we are lawfully entitled.

The Consumer Credit Act 1974 is not there to just look pretty, it's to protect the consumer too :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your like an angel in disguise, brilliant i hope justice will be done
:oops::)

 

 

letter goes off tomorrow, also what do i do with the lewis group who will still send letters?

Simple answer-IGNORE THEM!!! Make sure you send by recorded delivery every time and keep proof of postage and a copy of letter for yourself :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok will do,

 

also wbdfs the private message i sent you how powerful was that information?

 

Will that also be detrimental to the case?

 

thanks, sorry for the 400 questions

It's great too!! Only further compounds your case :) It's a common welcome practice but they will deny it no end! The fact is though, if it gets that far where you'll need to produce that information the burden of proof will be on them to prove their version rather than you prove your version :grin:

 

You know, if they didn't wanna find themselves in situations like this then they should've acted properly and within the law in the first place shouldn't they???!! :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it boils down to hankensens model where their customer concern is 0 and closing the sale is what it takes, the problem is when they screw it right up, there are so many niave people out there including myself where we are not educated enough to know our legal rights!!!!!!! Welcome thrive on this and suck the life out of peopls's finances who dont know any different.

 

With this forum welcome have become exposed hence their near demise, without caggers like yourself with such determination this would never have happended. Life is to short as it is, and I will not allow them to bully me or dictate what I can do when they decided to break the law, i trusted this company and they have breached that in such a disregard for their customers, i really hope this does not happen to anyone else no matter how tight your finances are, save, save and save again, dont rely on these vultures.

 

Will update you when the next move takes place, any other feedback from anyone then please feel free to post replies, i hope my situation is helping others to and please listen to wanabedebtfreesoon she has been a god send i promise you, she has calmed me down and got me to see the bigger picture where a few days ago i was beside myself!!!!!!!!!!!! Its not worth the stress. Thanks:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Letter Recieved This Morning From Welcome?

 

Dear Xxxxxxxxx

 

Thank You For Your Letter Recieved Xxx Requesting Information Held By Welcome Financial Services Ltd.

 

In Order For Us To Carry Out Your Request Please Can You Issue The Relevant Fee:

 

1) £1.00 Will Entitle You A Statement Of Account And Loan Agreement Under The Consumer Credit Act.

 

2) £10.00 For A Full Data Protection Request, Where We Provide All Information Held By Welcome Financial Services Ltd.

 

Cheques Should Be Made Payable To Welcome Financial Services Ltd.

 

Please Note That We Cannot Process Your Request Until We Have Recieved The Relevant Fee.

 

 

I Have Done This Before Are They Confused???

 

Help, I Sent The Letter In Previous Post For Cpr 31.6 Request???

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 31.6 deals with standard disclosure - that is disclosure that is part of the court process. You cannot ask for information under 31.6. Did you mean 31.16? If so, you have to make an application to the court using a N244 form and pay £75, you can't jut write to them.

 

Without a court case, or the promise of one, the only two options open to you are the two Welcome have given.

 

If you have already done one of these and Welcome have not responded, you shold write and tell them that. Both have remedies for non-compliance.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say that you have 2 options really; you can either write back to them and say that your request for info was made under CPR 31.16 whereby you are permitted to request documents for inspection before starting proceedings and therefore no fee is payable.

A fee is only payable if it was a request pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

It's true they absolutely don't have to give the agreement just by you writing and asking for it under CPR 31.16, but it seems fair that you give them the opportunity to voluntarily hand it over before going in all guns blazing with an order for disclosure from the court.

 

The second option would be to send the follow up letter which says, "I still haven't received the copy I asked for and if you don't give it I'll just have to apply for it via an N244 from court."

 

Have you had chance to look through this thread, it's really useful?? :)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading this thread with interest. I have just got my SAR and they too have only provided me with copies of my two agreements with them with a link at the top of the page like a printout of a scanned document from their database.

 

Is it recommended that all requests for CCA are made using the CPR 31.16 now rather than the standard request or just particular scenerios?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What WBDFS said may work but they only have to take notice of a part 31.16 request if you get a court order. In fact PAr 31.16 says, "This rule applies where an application is made to the court under any Act for disclosure before proceedings have started..."

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What WBDFS said may work but they only have to take notice of a part 31.16 request if you get a court order. In fact PAr 31.16 says, "This rule applies where an application is made to the court under any Act for disclosure before proceedings have started..."

Hello Steven4064, I've read Pt2537's thread on this topic and it goes through the whole process step by step from writing an initial letter to obtaining the order, it's fab! ;)

There is also a part which suggests that if you don't write to them prior to applying for the order you may find yourself liable for the other sides costs, should the order not be granted by the court because of a failure to adhere to pre action protocaol on the applicant's part! :eek:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use-98.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys and girls, could any body possibly help me. i recieved my subject access request today as advised by you guys. only to find that they have sent me copies and the date as been alltered on my copy of the agreement, and on the lagal charge mine and my partners signature have clearley been forged. what should i do HELP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

slightly confused guys,

 

so do I:

 

a) send them a £1.00 and get my agreement (but i have done this before)

b) send them £10 for full subject access request

c) send them a letter stating they have not fulfiled ny cpr 31.16 request?

 

Just confused because I already have the copy of the agreement which is incorrect and welcome have admitted this, but I dont have a copy of the orginal agreement from when it was last re-booked as the one I have is from their database print off???

 

please advise, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion I would say c) for now. You need to notify them that no fee is payable as this is NOT a Consumer Credit Act request, but in the interests of being reasonable you could enclose a SAE so they won't be out of pocket ;)

 

The fee of £1 is ONLY payable if you had made a request under Sec77/78 of CCA 1974.

 

In order for them to be forced to hand over the said documents you have to file a N244 at court and the court will issue an order to produce. All you are effectively doing now is saying, "Look I'm trying to be fair with you here, I want a copy of the signed original documents because I believe there is something on them that is dubious, and I'm giving you the option to give it voluntarily. If you don't want to give it I'll have no option but to apply for an order from the court whereby you will be forced to give it, so don't say I didn't tell you in advance of my intentions."

 

The court will be more inclined to grant the order if you can show that you've exhausted all other possibilities and this is a last resort because they're refusing to co-operate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Rob, I've had a go at a letter for you. Have a read thru and see how you feel :) Anything I say is not written in stone so please feel free to change anything you like or take further advice!! :D Cos end of day stuff, this is your case and you have to play it in a way that best suits you :)

 

Welcome Financial Services Ltd

Compliance Department

Mere Way

Ruddington

Nottingham

NG11 6NZ

Date:

FORMAL REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

CPR part 31.16

 

Account number: XXXXXXXX

Dear Sirs

On XXXXX I wrote to your organisation requesting that you supply me a copy of the agreement for my account. My request extended to the full agreement which bore my signature. Additionally I require the underwriting sheet or other document showing any commissions paid to you by the broker or by you to the broker.

 

I enclose a copy of the letter which was sent for your information.

 

I am now in receipt of the response issued by Welcome Finance dated XXXXX, requesting a fee in order to fulfil my request. I am very puzzled by this as my request for information was made in accordance with CPR 31.16 whereby no fee is payable. I did try to make it clear in my original letter stating that this was NOT a request made under section 77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The £1 fee would only be payable if I had made the request pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. My request was made pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 31.16 with the intention of giving Welcome Finance an opportunity to provide the requested documents so as to avoid the need for an application to the Court for an Order to Produce; and therefore no fee was required.

 

For the avoidance of doubt I still require copies of the documents originally requested, or confirmation that you no longer have them, by XXXXXX(21 days from date of this letter).

 

To avoid any financial issue that may be involved in Welcome Finance fulfilling my request I have enclosed a stamped, self addressed envelope for your convenience.

 

 

I hope this has cleared this matter up and I look forward to receiving your prompt response.

 

Yours Rob20042513

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...