Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ACS:Law copyright file sharing claims, Gallant Macmillan - and probably some others along the way...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest DJMadMax
It makes you proud to be British when you see the public fighting back against tyranny like this :D

 

 

lol i'm going to try my best to take them down just hope that all the info i now have on them will be good to have in the news paper there coming tomoz :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 4.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Has anybody looked at the signature at the end? Surely it would not be signed 'ACS LAW'. I would have thought it would have to be signed by someone considering the seriousness of the claim they are making and not a hand written scrawl saying ACS LAW, and it's a photocopy too. I kmow for a fact that they cannot just come out and ask you to pay £500 to settle out of court when it hasn't even got there. As for writing a LOD, if it is a [problem] surely we would only be writing back to the [problematic] themselves thus showing we have been, partially at least, suckered into the [problem].

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DJMadMax
Has anybody looked at the signature at the end? Surely it would not be signed 'ACS LAW'. I would have thought it would have to be signed by someone considering the seriousness of the claim they are making and not a hand written scrawl saying ACS LAW, and it's a photocopy too. I kmow for a fact that they cannot just come out and ask you to pay £500 to settle out of court when it hasn't even got there. As for writing a LOD, if it is a [problem] surely we would only be writing back to the [problematic] themselves thus showing we have been, partially at least, suckered into the [problem].

 

 

at this time it is junk mail but it is 100% not a skam there saying it's only done like that as there is so meny to send but dont pay it you sing the form and send it back then you will have to pay it

 

what was the file you was the name of the ment to of downloaded...?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DJMadMax

it just keeps coming in lol i want to ty all that have helped me get all the info i now have on the i'll let you all know if i have any joy

 

Logistep has issued a statement contending an IP address is not personal information. Company officials could not be reached Friday.

An IP address can indicate the location of a computer but not necessarily who is using it. Several people could share the same computer, which would have one IP address. But ISPs, as well as wireless routers used in home, can also dynamically assign IP addresses, which adds further ambiguity regarding who is using the computer and who may be responsible for illegally activity conducted on the PC.

That means the person paying the bill for the Internet service may end up as the target of the civil proceeding rather than the offender, adding another worrying factor into the lawsuits, Schaefer said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am supposed to have uploaded 'Scooter, Jumping all over the world' at 9.05am on a sunday morning. No-one in this house is EVER up let alone on the computer at that time on a Sunday.

I can understand them photocopying the letter as there are so many but the signature should be somebodys, even if it's only on behalf of someone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DJMadMax
I am supposed to have uploaded 'Scooter, Jumping all over the world' at 9.05am on a sunday morning. No-one in this house is EVER up let alone on the computer at that time on a Sunday.

I can understand them photocopying the letter as there are so many but the signature should be somebodys, even if it's only on behalf of someone.

 

like i said it's just a letter to try and make you pay up even if you did not do it.... they can try and make you pay it as much as they want but if it's not a court order it's not even coveing the price of the paper lol

 

File Name:

Scooter - Jumping All Over [2007][CD+2 SkidVid_XviD+Cov]

File Size:

151.88

File ID

F7FD8E0F745.....

 

 

you and 100's overs on this file

Edited by DJMadMax
Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anybody looked at the signature at the end? Surely it would not be signed 'ACS LAW'. I would have thought it would have to be signed by someone considering the seriousness of the claim they are making and not a hand written scrawl saying ACS LAW, and it's a photocopy too. I kmow for a fact that they cannot just come out and ask you to pay £500 to settle out of court when it hasn't even got there. As for writing a LOD, if it is a [problem] surely we would only be writing back to the [problematic] themselves thus showing we have been, partially at least, suckered into the [problem].

 

ACS:Law is the legal entity sending out these letters, so it can be signed "ACS:Law" to take effect.

 

There's a common misconception that legal letters such as these require an individuals signature to be effective, but as, in Law, the organisation is recognised as a Legal entity, with rights/duties/obligations, the organisation can send these letters without an individual having signed them.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looking at my letter ,they want 500.07 ,now i am new to all this but why do they want me to pay £7 for my ISP ADMINISTRATION COSTS.i am i worng in thinking they want money for the work somone else done.ie giving out my details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what is the latest action that has happened?

 

None that I can see.

 

I have yet to hear of anyone on here having court papers issued.

 

Interesting that on the website they refer to a US case, (which again is foreign law), and call it a victory for the 'creative industries'.

 

I wonder which particular creative industry they have in mind?

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DJMadMax
None that I can see.

 

I have yet to hear of anyone on here having court papers issued.

 

Interesting that on the website they refer to a US case, (which again is foreign law), and call it a victory for the 'creative industries'.

 

I wonder which particular creative industry they have in mind?

 

David

 

lol fefer to the US case's... you know why dont you.... thank of the way the US pep's are like there su'ing for dum things and win aka Judge Judy... oooo no my dog jumped becuase your car is to loud so i'm going to su....lol

 

and there law is not the same as in the UK so they can't even go on that

soz.. but there just full of it..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DJMadMax
emailed scooter web site to see if they know whats going on

 

 

know if you go on this [edit] you can file all the files being tracked may be you can ask them all if they know there work is being used to trap pep's in this way...

Edited by steven4064
link to commercial site removed - against site rules
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DJMadMax

owell 2pm was told to call ACS:Law back and they will ancer any info i need i'll also be asking if i can rec.. the phone call for when it comes to being put in the paper... lol let see what they'll say then...:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

looked at my letter and my file is the same as others, and madmax im actually 56 and can still dance lol but probably not to scooter lol dont even know what they sound like lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DJMadMax
hi

looked at my letter and my file is the same as others, and madmax im actually 56 and can still dance lol but probably not to scooter lol dont even know what they sound like lol

 

 

lol keep it up she cant tho.. :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be interesting to see what Scooter themselves have got to say about this as mentioned above...

With all due respect to them..they cant be that good that so many people have downloaded their song? :D

I wonder would Scooter themselves be able to sue ACS:Law for using their name like this? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DJMadMax

lol there not happy with what i'v found out and they can't say any thing about what i have asked them

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...