Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lets draw a line under this. I'm not saying I won't upload documents to this site Consumer Action Group, and I'm not saying that I take issue with with CAG data security. I said, "Can you recommend a free offline pdf editor" this is so I can merge the pdf's into one file as requested. Online utilities can be helpful, but we only have their word that they shall delete the uploaded documents in a given timeframe, but have no means of validating this, neither can we confirm that their security is up to scratch, if they were hacked and they weren't deleting as they claimed, then- And so, as I do not wish to upload my documents to a free online pdf merge utility, and that bona fide tools such as Adobe quite rightly aren't free, and you have a maximum upload of 4.88MB, I offered my website - a source that I can control as a viable alternative. From there we seem to have descended into a chaos of misunderstandings and half-truths
    • We have both a savings account and a current account, so thought we would get the £100 fairer share bonus - but we won't. Why?View the full article
    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OFT imposes requirements on Mackenzie Hall to improve handling of disputed debts


fermi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4442 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It really needs the OFT et al to stop pussy footing around, they have given enough warnings to these companies. It's about time they made an example of a couple of them and send shockwaves throughout the industry, letting them know in uncertain terms to either act within the guidelines or suffer the consequences.

 

I second that :mad:

 

The OFT etc. should be made to earn their salaries...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I really think its terrible that you are all kicking poor old Worst Credit and ********* **** whilst they are down. After all they cannot be held responsible for the systems errors that they are plagued with.

 

We really need to be helping the DCAs out in their hour of need.

 

 

 

 

Ooooooops there goes that flying pig

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really think its terrible that you are all kicking poor old Worst Credit and ********* **** whilst they are down. After all they cannot be held responsible for the systems errors that they are plagued with.

 

We really need to be helping the DCAs out in their hour of need.

 

 

 

 

Ooooooops there goes that flying pig

 

...and a bumble bee and a tea towel :confused::rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm helping someone with their Mackenzie Hall problem, and on Mon 20th April they telephoned his workplace (for the third time in as many weeks) asking for him to be given a message to phone them back immediately and that it was a "sensitive" matter. This is after signing for 2 letters putting the matter into dispute (stature barred) one in March and one on 16th April - so much for them adhering to the OFT requirements from 15th April !!

 

Complaint sent to the OFT.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm helping someone with their Mackenzie Hall problem, and on Mon 20th April they telephoned his workplace (for the third time in as many weeks) asking for him to be given a message to phone them back immediately and that it was a "sensitive" matter. This is after signing for 2 letters putting the matter into dispute (stature barred) one in March and one on 16th April - so much for them adhering to the OFT requirements from 15th April !!

 

Complaint sent to the OFT.

All of DCAs seem to be either totally stupid or very arrogant. Despite Worst Credit being warned by the OFT they still abuse the rules. Mackenzie Hall are the same. What is wrong with them. Has the message not reached the threat monkeys yet or are they waiting for the one who can read to come and read the OFT directions out to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...and a bumble bee and a tea towel :confused::rolleyes:

 

..... and a bloke on a chandelier...

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found this out and feel this is great news.....

 

Keep them coming OFT....

 

It shows we have to complain to the OFT all the time...

 

Lets see if we can get a DC credit license revoked!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because the OFT has give them this warning etc..dont expect any of them to change their ways anytime soon.

Their way of doing things is too installed in them for them to just change like that.

Its gonna take alot more warnings/alot more fines/licenses being revoked & even some of them being shut down and made an example of, for the DCA culture in this country to ever change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My beleif is that they have friends in high places, and so have no fear:(

 

Well up until recently they had representation in the House of Lords didnt they.. .

 

edit

 

As I said above, up until recently they had representation in the House of Lords :D:rolleyes:

Edited by HSBCrusher

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I saw this bit of spin on the credit today report....

 

"Mackenzie Hall therefore welcomes the focus, clarification, input and guidance of the Office of Fair Trading not only regards our own business practices, but also that of the high standards to which the debt collection industry as a whole strives."

 

Strive harder!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they haven't quoted Andrew Mackinley then? "The industry is rotten to the core, whether it is in-house recovery and collection, or where agents are used, or where the debt has been sold."

 

Wouldn't want to get Mr Mackinley into any trouble. What's the biggest font size you can use on this forum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...