Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • now do you want help or just come here to rant at the 1st chance. is this indictive of why you have this issue with BG? there isn't one really just you being pedantic? now give us a chance to decide lets have some info. we don't accept .jpg picture files as they are displayed directly to screen whereby anyone members or not can see them, hence we require a multipage pdf properly redacted. theres a good upload guide to read on that. so ball is your court... we still would help our worst enemy regardless . dx
    • doh sorry was on phone screen. i think thats all ok,  let @AndyOrch confirm 1st please. dx  
    • Same date as poc then i dont like the agreement either, it just smells to me, but i can't find a like one of that era to compare against. this is only 10yrs old, so weight that up, i'd say enforceable & most are from the ear as a whole here. it cant be a recon as they must state so, and it wouldn't/doesn't need to have a tickbox+typed name to be so either. >80% loss if you go fwd, unless you can pay the CCJ within 30 days of judgement in FULL, might be time to consider a tomlin/consent, as much as i hate link, if you don't want to gamble on a very small chance of a win or can't pay within 30 days if you lose. what date is the hearing? dx    
    • Hi T911 and welcome to CAG. As you say, an interesting screw up. So much for quality control! Anyway, our regular advice is to ignore all of their increasingly threatening missives... UNLESS you get a letter of claim, then come back here and we'll help you write a "snotty letter" to help them decide whether to take it any further with their stoopid pics. If you get mail you're unsure of, just upload it for the team to have a look.
    • Thanks @lolerzthat's an extremely helpful post. There is no mention of a permit scheme in the lease and likewise, no variation was made to bring this system in. I recall seeing something like a quiet enjoyment clause, but will need to re-read it and confirm. VERY interesting point on the 1987 Act. There hasn't been an AGM in years and I've tried to get one to start to no avail. However, I'll aim to find out more about how the PPC was brought in and revert. Can I test with you and others on the logic of not parking for a few months? I'm ready to fight OPS, so if they go nuclear on me then surely it doesn't matter? I assume that I will keep getting PCNs as long as I live here, so it doesn't make sense for me to change the way that I park?  Unless... You are suggesting that having 5 or so outstanding PCNs, will negatively affect any court case e.g. through bad optics? Or are we trying to force their hand to go to court with only 2 outstanding PCNs?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Laptop Damage Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

New here so bear with me! I have a laptop which my GF stood on during one of her careless moments. She was waiting for a taxi to go out, looked out the window and turned round, standing on the corner in her heels.

 

Result - Cracked screen. I hooked it up to an external monitor to see what the extenet of damage was, and it appears to keep hanging when accessing applications.

 

Im insured with Sainsburys/Halifax, and put a claim in on my home insurance. They did an interview on the phone, then asked me to take it somewhere at my expenses to get a damage report (they called it cause of damage report) and an estimate for repair and for replacement. I took it to a local firm, who have sent it off. They said they can report the damage, but they never heard of a cause of damage report, as they said they werent there so couldnt comment.

 

Laptop is 8 months old, cost £700 new in sale, so more like £900 value.

 

A few questions i have are:

1) Can i reclaim the cost of the report from the insurer?

2) Whats the likely outcome, repair or replacement?

3) Do they issue cash to pay for repair, or pay the shop?

4) Do they issue replacement unit, or give cash to buy one?

5) I got quotes for replacement, they came in at £800/£900.

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) You really need to read your policy wording - it can say that you incurr the costs to provide a report - Majority of large insurance companies sub contract to a contents team which do it for them and therefore the insured does not get charged (other than excess). If you provide the link to your insurance policy, I will have a look through it.

2) This really depends on the report - if it is more cost affective to replace then they will - taking into account that laptop prices are dropping like a stone at the moment.

3) Again this is down to your Insurance Policy - I know that some policies state that there "preferred method of payment" is sent to you but in the name of the shop. This is normally up for debate as some insureds wish to buy more expensive products so the insurer can cash settle at their discretion.

4) I'm not too sure how your insurer works but from what you have stated above, i.e. getting you to obtain a damage report, I would presume they will not replace the laptop for you. They will issue a cheque either in your name or shop.

5) I take it you have submitted these two estimates to Halifax? In order to settle a electrical contents claim, an insurer will normally like to have 2 estimates, a damage report and an original receipt or bank statement showing purchase.

 

If you got anymore Q's, don't hesitate to ask!

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou for the very thorough response. I read through the T&Cs online and it says i have to pay to substantiate my claim. £55 the GF will have to pay me!

 

The only thing that worries me is if say the laptop would be £500 to repair, and as the quotes have been coming in at about £700 to £900 (as mine was £900 reduced to £700 8 months ago and is no longer available) then they would opt to repair it. It is still under warranty though, so by opening it up and repairing, wont they invalidate the last 4 months of warranty.

 

Also, what if the repair does not fix everything, would they take it into consideration and say opt for replacement?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your quotes may come in at £700-£900 but the insurance company is able to go direct to the seller and enquire around a discount - If a shop accepts a reduced price then they open the chance of further business in the future - so is it really cost effective to repair over replace?

They may not give you the same laptop back - as long as it is as close as possible.

 

With regard to buildings claims, if repairs are done then the insurance company provides a 1 year warranty, I think this is the same for contents claims where they repair the item - but in your case, the companies you provided estimates for should offer you a certain warranty - most likely more than 4 months..:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...