Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repossesion - how long do you get before eviction?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5489 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a couple of cases going on which I won't bore anyone with the details of because they have gone on so long, but I am due in court within the next couple of months which will decide both cases (separately).

 

I have noticed on some threads people saying they had 48 hours to get out and others a month or two.

 

Can anyone tell me what the criteria is for setting timescales for eviction once a repossession has been granted by the court?

 

 

Also, I seem to remember reading on the forum a long time back now, that there was a case (reported) that enabled the property owners the right to take time to sell rather than being brutally evicted - can anyone recall what that case was?

 

Ta, just preparing myself for the worst case scenario...:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smarterchick

 

I dont think there is a definite timescale, It just depends on how busy the bailiffs are in your area. Once a warrants is issued its up to the bailiff to give a date.

 

 

Thanks, but who instructs the bailiff? Taking it from the time the Judge says " Reposession is granted" or whatever he/she says what is the actual process exactly? Do notice of evictions get prepared and by whom?

 

I just want to mentally prepare for this in the event things don't work out the way I expect, sods law something doesn't go quite to plan..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smarterchick.

 

I think the process goes something like:

lender aplies for warrant, this gets approved(not sure by whom),

this warrant then gets sent to the bailiffs office who will then give a date depending on their workload. they check their calendar and give an available date. the court/bailiffs office then send you the letter informing you of the date.

 

I am sure of this last part because my lender once applied for a warrant and it took ages to get a date, after 6 weeks I called the bailiffs office at my local court and a lady said to me they didnt have a bailiff at that court and were relying on another court for a bailiff. she then said that they were looking at them on a first come first serve basis and that somehow mine had just been lost somewhere in the pile.

anyway it was then looked at and some days later I got a date that was 8 weeks away, for eviction.

This was because the bailiffs in kingston somehow had a backlog of cases and also having to deal with cases from my own court.

 

basically what I gather is the bailiff will give an appointment based on their workload.

They will normally give more than 7 days.

I am afraid there is no hard or fast rule, its just wait and see.

 

although in the current climate I am sure you will get at least 3 weeks. bailiffs seem to be busy. also depends on where you are, some are busier than others.

 

I hope you wont be getting an eviction date tho, I hope things will work out the way you want them to.

Good Luck

Edited by vickson
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Vickson, I'm hoping to win both my claims and I won't get any evictions at all...I just want to be prepared. If you know the procedure, you can prepare for it.

 

I'd be very interest though if anyone can remember that case that allowed the resident to sell the house themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

 

The procedure you've said is correct - once the order has been given by the Judge, the lender has to apply for the warrant, which is passed to a bailiff to fix the appointment. It does depend on area and how busy they are - note that the eviction date from the bailiff should be hand delivered to your home. You are entitled to appeal against any warrant, this may buy you some more time if you get a sympathetic Judge.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mystical

Should the order be hand delivered, I must note that I have never had mine hand delivered, I always come home after work and find the postman has delivered them because they have an actuall stamp from Royal Mail.

 

Smarterchick.

 

You can apply to sell the property yourself under the Law and Property Act 1925. try and google the case of Cheltenham & Gloucester vs Krausz

Edited by vickson
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vickson.

 

The order itself from the Court will come through the post, but the actual eviction date should be hand delivered by the bailiff directly to the property. This is to ensure the defendant is aware of the eviction date from the court not purely reliant on the Claimant, and also gives the bailiff the opportunity to check out the property - whether the defendant has already left, possible aggressive dogs at the property etc. To be honest, the majority of my knowledge lies in Social Housing as this is my line of work, but the Court procedure for warrant of possession is the same across the board.

 

The time scale for the eviction date also depends on the order given, ie, possession in 28 days means the Claimant can't even apply for the warrant until after the 28 days. I'd say you're looking at 2-6 weeks for an eviciton date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on of of my repossessions, the lender took nearly a year from being granted possesssion to the actual warrant of execution ( ie the bailiffs)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

on of of my repossessions, the lender took nearly a year from being granted possesssion to the actual warrant of execution ( ie the bailiffs)

 

'One of your repossessions'?, geez have you gone through it more than once? That must test even the strongest - my commisserations.

 

If it even happens once to me my marriage will be dead I reckon...:mad:

Anyway, thanks for adding to this, it all helps, but were there any particular reasons for this delay that you know of?

 

SC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol Smarterchick,

I think you will find there are a few of us that have had eviction notices more than once.

Nuke em on the other hand had a few properties on buy to let.

 

 

:D My ones a straight forward repo cos I didn't pay...they've tried lots of times before, but I've always salvaged the situation. This time I've turned it back on them and put in a counterclaim, just to spice things up of course....:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...