Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • UK citizens will be subject to the same rules as other Third Country Nationals. Keir Starmer to warn of 'major disruption' risk ahead of new UK-EU border checks | ITV News WWW.ITV.COM Ministers will announce measures to try to blunt the impact of the changes, writes ITV News Deputy Political Editor Anushka Asthana. | ITV National...  
    • Oh I see! thats confusing, for some reason the terms and conditions that Evri posted in that threads witness statement are slightly different than the t&cs on packlinks website. Their one says enter into a contract with the transport agency, but the website one says enter into a contract with paclink. via website: (c) Each User will enter into a contract with Packlink for the delivery of its Goods through the chosen Transport Agency. via evri witness statement in that thread: (c) Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency I read your post at #251, so I should use the second one (and changing the screenshot in the court bundle), since I am saying I have a contract with Evri? Is that correct EDIT: Oh I understand the rest of your conversation. you're saying if I was to do this i would have to fully adjust my ws to use the consumer rights act instead of rights of third parties. In that case should I just edit the terms and stick with the third parties plan?. And potentially if needed just bring up the CRA in the hearing, as you guys did in that thread  
    • First, those are the wrong terms,  read posts 240-250 of the thread ive linked to Second donough v stevenson should be more expanded. You should make refernece to the three fold duty of care test as well. Use below as guidance: The Defendant failed its duty of care to the Claimant. As found in Donoghue v Stevenson negligence is distinct and separate to any breach of contract. Furthermore, as held in the same case there need not be a contract between the Claimant and the Defendant for a duty to be established, which in the case of the Claimant on this occasion is the Defendant’s duty of care to the Claimant’s parcel whilst it is in their possession. By losing the Claimant’s parcel the Defendant has acted negligently and breached this duty of care. As such the Claimant avers that even if it is found that the Defendant not be liable in other ways, by means of breach of contract, should the court find there is no contract between Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant would still have rise to a claim on the grounds of the Defendant’s negligence and breach of duty of care to his parcel whilst it was in the Defendant’s possession, as there need not be a contract to give rise to a claim for breach of duty of care.  The court’s attention is further drawn to Caparo Industries plc v Dickman (1990), 2 AC 605 in which a three fold test was used to determine if a duty of care existed. The test required that: (i) Harm must be a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant’s conduct; (ii) A relationship of proximity must exist and (iii) It must be fair, just and reasonable to impose liability.  
    • Thank you. here's the changes I made 1) removed indexed statement of truth 2) added donough v Stevenson in paragraph 40, just under the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 paragraph about reasonable care and skill. i'm assuming this is a good place for it? 3) reworded paragraph 16 (now paragraph 12), and moved the t&cs paragraphs below it then. unless I understood you wrong it seems to fit well. or did you want me to remove the t&cs paragraphs entirely? attached is the updated draft, and thanks again for the help. WS and court bundle-1 fourth draft redacted.pdf
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Repossesion - how long do you get before eviction?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a couple of cases going on which I won't bore anyone with the details of because they have gone on so long, but I am due in court within the next couple of months which will decide both cases (separately).

 

I have noticed on some threads people saying they had 48 hours to get out and others a month or two.

 

Can anyone tell me what the criteria is for setting timescales for eviction once a repossession has been granted by the court?

 

 

Also, I seem to remember reading on the forum a long time back now, that there was a case (reported) that enabled the property owners the right to take time to sell rather than being brutally evicted - can anyone recall what that case was?

 

Ta, just preparing myself for the worst case scenario...:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Smarterchick

 

I dont think there is a definite timescale, It just depends on how busy the bailiffs are in your area. Once a warrants is issued its up to the bailiff to give a date.

 

 

Thanks, but who instructs the bailiff? Taking it from the time the Judge says " Reposession is granted" or whatever he/she says what is the actual process exactly? Do notice of evictions get prepared and by whom?

 

I just want to mentally prepare for this in the event things don't work out the way I expect, sods law something doesn't go quite to plan..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Smarterchick.

 

I think the process goes something like:

lender aplies for warrant, this gets approved(not sure by whom),

this warrant then gets sent to the bailiffs office who will then give a date depending on their workload. they check their calendar and give an available date. the court/bailiffs office then send you the letter informing you of the date.

 

I am sure of this last part because my lender once applied for a warrant and it took ages to get a date, after 6 weeks I called the bailiffs office at my local court and a lady said to me they didnt have a bailiff at that court and were relying on another court for a bailiff. she then said that they were looking at them on a first come first serve basis and that somehow mine had just been lost somewhere in the pile.

anyway it was then looked at and some days later I got a date that was 8 weeks away, for eviction.

This was because the bailiffs in kingston somehow had a backlog of cases and also having to deal with cases from my own court.

 

basically what I gather is the bailiff will give an appointment based on their workload.

They will normally give more than 7 days.

I am afraid there is no hard or fast rule, its just wait and see.

 

although in the current climate I am sure you will get at least 3 weeks. bailiffs seem to be busy. also depends on where you are, some are busier than others.

 

I hope you wont be getting an eviction date tho, I hope things will work out the way you want them to.

Good Luck

Edited by vickson
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Vickson, I'm hoping to win both my claims and I won't get any evictions at all...I just want to be prepared. If you know the procedure, you can prepare for it.

 

I'd be very interest though if anyone can remember that case that allowed the resident to sell the house themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there.

 

The procedure you've said is correct - once the order has been given by the Judge, the lender has to apply for the warrant, which is passed to a bailiff to fix the appointment. It does depend on area and how busy they are - note that the eviction date from the bailiff should be hand delivered to your home. You are entitled to appeal against any warrant, this may buy you some more time if you get a sympathetic Judge.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mystical

Should the order be hand delivered, I must note that I have never had mine hand delivered, I always come home after work and find the postman has delivered them because they have an actuall stamp from Royal Mail.

 

Smarterchick.

 

You can apply to sell the property yourself under the Law and Property Act 1925. try and google the case of Cheltenham & Gloucester vs Krausz

Edited by vickson
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Vickson.

 

The order itself from the Court will come through the post, but the actual eviction date should be hand delivered by the bailiff directly to the property. This is to ensure the defendant is aware of the eviction date from the court not purely reliant on the Claimant, and also gives the bailiff the opportunity to check out the property - whether the defendant has already left, possible aggressive dogs at the property etc. To be honest, the majority of my knowledge lies in Social Housing as this is my line of work, but the Court procedure for warrant of possession is the same across the board.

 

The time scale for the eviction date also depends on the order given, ie, possession in 28 days means the Claimant can't even apply for the warrant until after the 28 days. I'd say you're looking at 2-6 weeks for an eviciton date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on of of my repossessions, the lender took nearly a year from being granted possesssion to the actual warrant of execution ( ie the bailiffs)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]....Please don't bother my master 'cos my sister & I might bite you...

 

I DO NOT offer legal advice

-

"I just say what I say because everyone is entitled to my opinion!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

on of of my repossessions, the lender took nearly a year from being granted possesssion to the actual warrant of execution ( ie the bailiffs)

 

'One of your repossessions'?, geez have you gone through it more than once? That must test even the strongest - my commisserations.

 

If it even happens once to me my marriage will be dead I reckon...:mad:

Anyway, thanks for adding to this, it all helps, but were there any particular reasons for this delay that you know of?

 

SC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol Smarterchick,

I think you will find there are a few of us that have had eviction notices more than once.

Nuke em on the other hand had a few properties on buy to let.

 

 

:D My ones a straight forward repo cos I didn't pay...they've tried lots of times before, but I've always salvaged the situation. This time I've turned it back on them and put in a counterclaim, just to spice things up of course....:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...