Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marlin/Mortimer CCJ HFC Marbles Card - Set Aside Help **WON plus Costs**


Spamalot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5188 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi spam, if it were me, i think id be inclined to concentrate on the stuff to get the set aside, ie CA, default notice, NOA, etc. this other stuff is great defence fodder but dont let it knock u off the scent so to speak. if they have no enforceable CA or other docs they have no case and u have gd grounds. have u had a hearing date for the set aside yet? i dont like to be the one to suggest it cos im not 100% on this stuff but cpr disclosure might be a gd step. to my mind if u go thru the steps to get the docs ie. CA rqst/SAR/CPR/CPR reminder/possibly (as per PT thread) CPR enforcement and u still get nth or garbage, at least u have shown the DJ that u have tried every possible means to get the relevant info b4 u even set foot in the court. also if u ve dun all that its got to make it diff for them to come back and have a crack at the judgment in the future, which is smth else to bear in mind. others may have better ideas but thats wot makes sense to me. hope u dont mind my commenting

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 578
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks R&B..comments appreciated and taken on board.

I haven't had a date for the set aside hearing as yet and I am, as you can see, gathering as much evidence as poss for my draft defence should I get a crack at it....but I'm also trying to get as much evidence together to support my claim that I was led up the garden path by my DMC and that I admitted the claim through ignorance and their unsound advice.

Don't want the DJ to say ' well you admitted it so what are you whingeing about go away and stop wasting my time!':D

So far as you can see I have done CCA request (1st April 09) and SAR (9th April 09)to Marlin....no joy regards CA so far. I have also SAR'd HFC (8th April 09) no reply whatsoever from them to date. not even a T&C

 

How long d'ya think I should give them before sending CPR?

 

Thanks again :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't want the DJ to say ' well you admitted it so what are you whingeing about go away and stop wasting my time!':D

:)

 

ur goin for set aside under 13.3 so he shudnt if u have a decent defence.

if u read PTs thread u need to be very reasonable in the time given to reply, so soon as i wud have thought, IF u want to go that route. u have an impending hearing so u cant be too generous. other opinion would be gd on this.

 

I think that if it gets to the stage where the judge makes an order for disclosure and you both hand in your evidence then both sides have to disclose everything they have in relsation to the debt so that would include letters etc would'nt it??

 

do u mean on the enforcement of the cpr?if so, i think (only my own observations) at that point u have specified the docs u wanna see (depending on which u used) which wud generally be the major docs reqd for enforcement. please correct me if im wrong id hate to mislead spam.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi r&b

 

As my case is at the "lets swap doccuments" stage ie....I have to fill in a disclosure list (N265) to say what doccuments I have in my pocession and that I am going to rely on them in court...... like bank statements and correspondence between claiment and defendent. The other side have to do the same and then, say they put that they have a default notice etc I could then request to see the original copy within 7 days. SO if they have letters etc between themselves and spammy then they HAVE to disclose them otherwise they cannot rely upon them in court.

 

See, clear as mud......:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the enforcement of the CPR, thats what you ask for in the draft order for directions that you attatch to the Allocation Questionaire (I think):confused:....and the judge SHOULD read and make an order as per......

 

But they dont, as I had sent MC a request for Information using CPR 18 and MC ignored it, and I asked in draft order (that they be made to show mw stuff like default notice etc) and the judge made absolutely NO mention of this in the order he made following the AQ handing in.

 

In the order it just said basically both parties hand your evidence in by such a date.......

 

fedup

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with r&b - concentrate on the set aside first.

 

The DCA doesn't have to provide copy correspondence if they no longer have it - they may have only kept a note on your records. Certainly looks from the papertrail as though your DMA has messed up though. Have you thought of a SAR to them? And yes, the evidence for the mess up would prob. be valuable in your SA hearing.

 

Re. your defence & the relevant docs. you can ask for those at that time. Sorry if you've stated it already but is the claim over £5000 i.e. fast track rather than small claims?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry spam i hope this is all relevant and not hijacking. something occurred to me whilst i was doing my cpr rqsts. that being if u get to the point of n244 application for disclosure, you can ask in the draft order that unless they comply the court set aside the juidgment. i cant remember if that equates with PTs advice as that thread is not abt set asides but it seemed reasonable to me. thats why im wondering if it would be useful in your circumstances as it would in effect remove the need to go thru the set aside hearing (or have both at the same time maybe). that is of course if u get no reply to speak of. either way u will know wot u r dealing with, which i believe was the point of that thread in the first place, allowing u to formulate a proper defence with a proper paper trail. just my thoughts from what ive been doing in my own cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi r&b

 

As my case is at the "lets swap doccuments" stage ie....I have to fill in a disclosure list (N265) to say what doccuments I have in my pocession and that I am going to rely on them in court...... like bank statements and correspondence between claiment and defendent. The other side have to do the same and then, say they put that they have a default notice etc I could then request to see the original copy within 7 days. SO if they have letters etc between themselves and spammy then they HAVE to disclose them otherwise they cannot rely upon them in court.

 

See, clear as mud......:D

 

Just a quick observation - you don't list all the letters in an N265 - the art is to put them in and not tell the other side what they are:

 

So for example you would put in "correspondence received from the Claimant of various dates"...you don't list it item by item

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks R&B..comments appreciated and taken on board.

I haven't had a date for the set aside hearing as yet and I am, as you can see, gathering as much evidence as poss for my draft defence should I get a crack at it....but I'm also trying to get as much evidence together to support my claim that I was led up the garden path by my DMC and that I admitted the claim through ignorance and their unsound advice.

Don't want the DJ to say ' well you admitted it so what are you whingeing about go away and stop wasting my time!':D

So far as you can see I have done CCA request (1st April 09) and SAR (9th April 09)to Marlin....no joy regards CA so far. I have also SAR'd HFC (8th April 09) no reply whatsoever from them to date. not even a T&C

 

How long d'ya think I should give them before sending CPR?

 

Sorry to stick my nose in but...

 

I think that you need to become pro - active the CPR 31.14 letter - allowing 7 days for a reply needs to go off immediately by first class recorded - if you have access to a fax - so much the better.

 

If you've already done the 31.14 letter and had no reply - another letter enclosing a copy of the 1st letter - give them a further 7 days to reply and tell them if they don't that you'll be applying for an order.

 

Can I just clarify - they have a ccj - what was the order - was it an instalments order or was it forthwith

 

Hope that's useful

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick observation - you don't list all the letters in an N265 - the art is to put them in and not tell the other side what they are:

 

So for example you would put in "correspondence received from the Claimant of various dates"...you don't list it item by item

 

Hi IGNM

 

Yes i have seen that in other threads and have just listed in general order ie "pages 2 to 12;- correspondence between defendent and claiment";)

 

But see my thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/183981-county-court-claim-help.htmland you will see they have offered a tomlin order......

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with r&b - concentrate on the set aside first.

 

Re. your defence & the relevant docs. you can ask for those at that time. Sorry if you've stated it already but is the claim over £5000 i.e. fast track rather than small claims?

 

Hi FG, the claim is for over £5000 therefore I assume fastrack...whatever that might mean! :?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote=I've got no money;2135586

Sorry to stick my nose in but...

 

I think that you need to become pro - active the CPR 31.14 letter - allowing 7 days for a reply needs to go off immediately by first class recorded - if you have access to a fax - so much the better.

 

If you've already done the 31.14 letter and had no reply - another letter enclosing a copy of the 1st letter - give them a further 7 days to reply and tell them if they don't that you'll be applying for an order.

 

Can I just clarify - they have a ccj - what was the order - was it an instalments order or was it forthwith

 

Hope that's useful

 

All input welcome IGNM.:)

Thanks for your comments....the CCJ was for an 'assigned' credit card debt for over £5000 which I have been ordered to pay back in instalments.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FG, the claim is for over £5000 therefore I assume fastrack...whatever that might mean! :?

 

It would mean you would be liable for the other side's costs if you lose :(

 

However on the bright side, it means you can use CPR31 to your advantage :)

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would mean you would be liable for the other side's costs if you lose :(

 

However on the bright side, it means you can use CPR31 to your advantage :)

 

 

Yikes:eek::eek::eek: Best make sure my defence is as watertight as poss then!!!!

 

I've been preparing my CPR request and I am now confused as to which rule I am requesting it under.

 

Having read the Stickys I see there is a 31.4 and a 31.6.

 

As I am going for a set aside hearing (date not set as yet)of judgement already in force which one do I use??

 

Help please...is it PTs or X20s :confused:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been preparing my CPR request and I am now confused as to which rule I am requesting it under.

 

Having read the Stickys I see there is a 31.4 and a 31.6.

 

As I am going for a set aside hearing (date not set as yet)of judgement already in force which one do I use??

 

Help please...is it PTs or X20s :confused:

 

think u mean 31.14/31.16. IGNM advoates 31.14 in post above. i think from memory x20 posted that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

31.16 is pre - action so not relevant

31.14 is the one that you use - as r & b points out I advocate using X20's version

 

You need to get the request done ASAP

If I've helped feel free to add to my reputation.

 

I am not a Practising Lawyer. My comments are my opinion only. You should not rely upon those comments and should always take your own professional advice from a practising Solicitor or Barrister

Link to post
Share on other sites

think u mean 31.14/31.16. IGNM advoates 31.14 in post above. i think from memory x20 posted that.

 

31.16 is pre - action so not relevant

31.14 is the one that you use - as r & b points out I advocate using X20's version

 

You need to get the request done ASAP

 

Thanks peeps....on to it now:-)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, If anyone's out there..help on this bit please..

 

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court. (I assume I put the date of original claim back in December and Northampton CC)

 

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim. ( This is where it gets tricky...due to c**k up of DMC...partial admission of full amount was sent to claimant and not court!!! Therefore no defence was submitted and CCJ was awarded....so what do I put here if anything?

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored][delete if no such request was delivered] (no request sent prior to judgement but 2 ca requests sent prior to set aside hearing so far)

 

The rest I can cope with...

 

Any advice please.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

in the abscence of advice I have done this....

 

On 29th November 2008 I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the Northampton County Court, and subsequently received a judgement against me.

 

I am applying for this judgement to be set aside and it is my intention to defend the whole claim.

 

Prior to this set aside hearing I have delivered two requests for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request has been unfulfilled to this date.

 

Comments /input/ PLEASE;)

 

This is in regards to the wording of CPR request based on x20's draft

Edited by Spamalot
clarification

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have at last received something in the post as a result of my SAR to HFC.

It is a list of exactly 6yrs transactions......still no 'balance' on there though.

 

Can anyone please tell me what I should be looking out for in respect of unlawful charges etc. Bearing in mind this was a credit card agreement.

Thanks peeps. :D

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Further to the above....

 

Having gone through the list of transactions, I have picked out the following;

 

Aug 03......£20.....Late Charge Assessment.

May 04......£25.....Late Charge Assessment

July 04.......£25....Late Charge Assessment

Oct 06.......£12....Late Payment Admin Charge

Nov 06.......£12....Late Payment

Dec06........£12.....Late Payment

Jan 07.......£12......Late Payment

Feb 07.......£12......Late Payment

Mar 07.......£12......Late Payment

Mar 07.......£12.....Overlimit Charge.(Bearing in mind I'd been trying to arrange payments with them since Oct 2006 and it's their charges that put me over the limit!!!:mad:)

 

Also...I'm assuming that Billed Finance Charge = Interest, But can anyone tell me what Billed Deferred Finance Charge is?...These seem to be regular small amounts added on the same day as the Interest .....although as there is no actual balance at the begining or end of this statement Who knows whether it's been added or taken away!!;)

 

These sheets are the sum total of my SAR...

Not a whiff or a mention of a CA.

Not a whiff or a mention of an Assignment.

Not a copy of a default notice or two...

NOTHING......How that cost me £10 I don't know!!!:p

 

Perhaps there's more to come and they're sending it seperately.:idea:

 

Oh yes, The covering letter was from 'Beneficial', and it states that my July 2008 to March 2009 Statements are not enclosed as there's been no activity on my account for that period.....Strange seeing as they've 'sold' it to Phoenix that they don't seem to know about it. :rolleyes:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone please tell me what I should be looking out for in respect of unlawful charges etc. Bearing in mind this was a credit card agreement.

Thanks peeps. :D

 

hi spam, i wud say any charges. the fact that they are there at all without an agreement to back them up makes them unlawful after all how cud they chge interest when u have no stipulation as to the rate charged, how cud they charge penalties without any stipulation as to the level of chge, or why it was charged, etc ,etc? i think they wud just all get lumped together in any defence anyhow.

doesnt seem like a proper SAR reply to me, no bal on statements!!! no CA/DN/NOA is gd news at this point i wud say. have they previously sent u anth to go on at all, like a blank agreement or smtg like that?

have u dun the 31.14 rqst yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...