Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

They wont leave me alone!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I was thinking after posting on here some months ago regarding a PPC ticket (Car Parking Partnerships) that I should post again this weekend to say that they have finally left me alone so all my ignoring really did work!!

 

Until today.

 

Got home from work and there is yet another letter waiting for me. The 'offence' was ticketed on 25/11/08 and I (foolishly) appealed. Twice. Wont take Einstein to figure what the result was. I have never denied being the registered keeper but I contested the driver issue. Also the photos they took of the vehicle 'obstructing' was a complete joke as any sane person can see the vehicle wasnt obstructing anything. I mentioned this as being more like evidence to prove the vehicle was in the clear. But thats besides the point.

 

I had heard nothing and even moved house. I received a letter which means they have got my details from the DVLA as any previous correspondence was from a previous address. This time I have the delight of threats of a debt collection agency.

 

How in the name of God do I make them stop. Its becoming a nightmare - they are relentless.

 

All I would be saying to a debt collection agency is that I am in dispute with the PPC so I suggest they go back to them. The PPC ignored requests for proof of who was the driver.

 

Is that the right thing to say to the debt collection agency as I have no intention of paying these 'people' but its taking every ounce of self will not to write a blasting letter as I'm absolutely furious at being repeatedly asked for this money when they do not know who was driving. Which I have pointed out to them. Twice.

 

Thanks muchly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont worry. You are nearly at the end of the line. They are getting really deperate now. Have you had the 'final,final,final' chance to pay letter yet?

Avoid any correspondence. If you write to them they will send the same rubbish over and over again. It will end though-and soon from what details you have posted :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I was thinking after posting on here some months ago regarding a PPC ticket (Car Parking Partnerships) that I should post again this weekend to say that they have finally left me alone so all my ignoring really did work!!

 

Until today.

 

Got home from work and there is yet another letter waiting for me. The 'offence' was ticketed on 25/11/08 and I (foolishly) appealed. Twice. Wont take Einstein to figure what the result was. I have never denied being the registered keeper but I contested the driver issue. Also the photos they took of the vehicle 'obstructing' was a complete joke as any sane person can see the vehicle wasnt obstructing anything. I mentioned this as being more like evidence to prove the vehicle was in the clear. But thats besides the point.

 

I had heard nothing and even moved house. I received a letter which means they have got my details from the DVLA as any previous correspondence was from a previous address. This time I have the delight of threats of a debt collection agency.

 

How in the name of God do I make them stop. Its becoming a nightmare - they are relentless.

 

All I would be saying to a debt collection agency is that I am in dispute with the PPC so I suggest they go back to them. The PPC ignored requests for proof of who was the driver.

 

Is that the right thing to say to the debt collection agency as I have no intention of paying these 'people' but its taking every ounce of self will not to write a blasting letter as I'm absolutely furious at being repeatedly asked for this money when they do not know who was driving. Which I have pointed out to them. Twice.

 

Thanks muchly

 

As the guys say, you are almost there now - the only reason it has dragged out for so long is because you appealed - dont worry it's almost over.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what you guys are saying is right. I've calmed down thanks to a trip to the pub. DDWales - yes, this is the final, final.... after this its debt collection. The joke is, that they state on the letter that any court action will go against my credit and affect my ability to borrow money. Are they having a laugh..? Half the country is bankrupt, in this current economic climate, I'd like to see ANYONE try to borrow money. Surely thats the weakest threat out there at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know what you guys are saying is right. I've calmed down thanks to a trip to the pub. DDWales - yes, this is the final, final.... after this its debt collection. The joke is, that they state on the letter that any court action will go against my credit and affect my ability to borrow money. Are they having a laugh..? Half the country is bankrupt, in this current economic climate, I'd like to see ANYONE try to borrow money. Surely thats the weakest threat out there at the moment.

 

Hello Northern Lass,

 

What you should know is that the reality of the situation is you will only have this reported on your credit reference in the instance that the PPC take you to court (0.01% chance), they win (0.001%) chance and you do not settle the judgement within the terms set by the judge - usually a month. In short, they are talking a load of nonsense to scare you in to coughing up.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

TFT - And thats without a judge seeing the 'evidence' which shows the nearest obstruction - another car - 4m away. I think what shook me up was the fact they have gone to the DVLA to get my new address. I didnt think that was legal. But anyway like you say, chances are thinner than a coat of paint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you're on the hooked fish list since you appealed.

 

You could have 1, 3 or 5 more letters.

 

They *will* go away though. And ignoring letters isn't a huge hardship.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TFT - And thats without a judge seeing the 'evidence' which shows the nearest obstruction - another car - 4m away. I think what shook me up was the fact they have gone to the DVLA to get my new address. I didnt think that was legal. But anyway like you say, chances are thinner than a coat of paint.

 

Don't worry about the DVLA - they hand out our personal info to any old tom, dick or harry - they make £4million a year from it did you know? Basically, a PPC can pay a figure in the region of £2-£3 to get our address so that they can send us their joke invoices. Apart from that, the DVLA have absolutely no interest in private land issues - you wont get any hassle from them rest assured. At the moment, the DVLA can legally had out our details if there is a reasonable cause to do so. You will start to find the threats of the PPC quite amusing - especially when they role out the old were sending someone round to see you - put it this way I wouldn't bother buying any cake as it will be as hard as a brick by the time they eventually arrive lol.

 

The principle is that if they thought that they had a valid claim they would just take you straight to court; because they never do have a valid claim they have to resort to threat mail instead.

 

TFT

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...