Jump to content


Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


0 Neutral
  1. Thanks you all for the advice. I'll ignore, not appeal and wait for the letters and threats to arrive, and then ignore them. Unless it's a court summons and then I put the case that they didn't follow the rules.
  2. They do have photos or car entering and leaving, but also photos of driver walking into Starbucks and then going to McD's. So I assume this is ANPR capture, but because NTK was received 20 days after incident, there is no reason to identify driver and therefore no reason to pay. Is this correct?
  3. You've confused me. 'your NTK has been issued too soon, for a (vanishing) windscreen ticket that should have arrived 29 - 56 days.' There was no windscreen ticket. NTK was issued by MET on 28 March, 15 days after incident. NTK was received in post on 2 April, 20 days after incident. How was 'NTK issued too soon'? Was it not received by 'Keeper' too late? i.e. more than 14 days after the incident.
  4. For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident) Please answer the following questions. 1 Date of the infringement 13 March 2022 2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 28 March 2022 3 Date received 2 April 2022 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes, photos of driver walking into Starbucks Coffee Shop and later walking to McDonalds 4-5meters from Starbucks entrance. Starbucks is 'the site' that MET Parking Services is saying the driver walked out of and therefore is in breach of MET T&C's 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up No 7 Who is the parking company? MET Parking Services 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Southgate Park, Stansted, CM24 1PY For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Independent Appeals Service (POPLA) PCN Letter already attached to this thread (see 1st post in this thread)
  5. I thought that was the case. Thank you for the confirmation. So should I ignore it, or appeal the charge notice? I've read on other threads that it's best to ignore it, as to appeal I have to give them the drivers name, and that's not a good idea. I know if I ignore it, I'll get lots of letters demanding I pay and it could end up in court, but all the previous threads say that if it does go to court it will be dismissed. I don't mind getting the letter, etc. but not being a legal expert I want to have some confidence that ignoring it won't get me in trouble.
  6. Today I received a letter from MET Parking Services, saying I was in breach of their T's & C's by leaving the site of Southgate Park , Stansted.. Driver parked car, entered Starbucks, bought something in Starbucks and then went next door to McDonalds. MET have pictures of driver entering Starbucks Coffee Shop (the site) and leaving a few minutes later to go next door to McDonalds Having reviewed previous posts on this location. I think I can ignore the notice and the subsequent notices and threats, as I didn't receive the letter within 14 days of the event. Redacted copy of the letter from MET is attached. What should I do? Ignore or pay the fine? 280322 - Parking Charge Notice Redacted.pdf
  • Create New...