Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can anybody blow a hole in this advantage finance CCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Following this thread with interest. I am in the same boat and have been unable to find the answer.

 

I made about 1k payments over a year for a vehicle that cost about 6k. I couldn't keep up with the payments and so they defaulted me and whipped away the car! :-( this was back in 2005 ish...

 

Anyway, Direct Legal and Collections are the holders of a lovely debt of about 5.5k!!! i've been paying a pound a month all this time..it does seem unfair that they are collecting all that..when they've sold the car..and had the deposit + payments i made already!!!! i only had it for about a year maybe..

 

I spoke to the national debt people who have a template letter on their website which asks for a statement of account and cca in one hit...this will then hopefully check that this amount is at least correct as i have no idea how much they sold the car for...

 

but yeah..gutted they want 5k, plus they've had the car back...sucks!!!:(

 

planning on sending a letter on tuesday..so will let you know as and when i find out more details

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

How was the DN delivered?

 

If it was sent by post, CPR 6 applies - service is deemed to take place 2 working after it was posted if sent by first class post and 4 working days after it was posted if sent by second class post. Business days are Monday to Friday, excluding bank holidays, Good Friday and Christmas day.

 

If they haven't allowed 14 clear days after service for you to rectify the default, then I believe the DN is invalid and they are guilty of unlawful recission of contract.

 

Have you read surfaceagentx20's thread 'A Tale of A dodgy DN'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi underdog

 

Would you say my default notice is INVALID ??

 

Are you saying they should have given me 16 days total to rectify??

 

Can you point me to where in the consumer credit act this is stated

 

I am going to court this month and need some words to this affect if my DN is invalid.

 

I was going to use this statement to the judge(faulty DN sounds better tho)

 

"The figure stated by ***** finance for the balance outstanding exc interest as £1764.88 which is false, as this includes the interest for the full term of the agreement which was never reached.

 

The remaining sum asked for by ****** finance is including the interest for the full term of the loan, which ****** terminated 16 months early and as such are not entitled to claim for."

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes postggj I credit you for that info, so would you say my Default notice is invalid as they did not allow the prescribed 16 days, even though they allowed 21 days before sending a termination notice?

 

Also postggj which section of the consumer credit act do I need to look at as I need something to quote in court :???:

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

a default notice is issued first, that is a sort of termination notice.

ignore that notice and the creditor can place a default on your credit file and then send you another letter saying the account has been termnated.

next step is a court claim or dca.

 

the 14 days start from the date of the letter,

so its two days from letter then 14 more days

 

ill dig out the relevent info

Link to post
Share on other sites

Service times are stated in CPR 6;

 

Part 6 rules about service apply generally

6.1

 

This Part applies to the service of documents, except where –

 

(a) another Part, any other enactment or a practice direction makes different provision; or

 

(b) the court orders otherwise.

(Other Parts, for example, Part 54 (Judicial Review) and Part 55 (Possession Claims) contain specific provisions about service.)

 

Interpretation

 

6.2

 

In this Part –

 

(a) ‘bank holiday’ means a bank holiday under the Banking and Financial Dealings Act 19711 in the part of the United Kingdom where service is to take place;

 

(b) ‘business day’ means any day except Saturday, Sunday, a bank holiday, Good Friday or Christmas Day;

Link to post
Share on other sites

okay read it

 

So I am going to court saying my default notice is invalid as it did not allow 16 days to rectify and so I did not know precisely what I had to do in order to comply with it and was consequently disadvantaged

 

No second default notice can be issued without my permission

 

and finally they owe me a grand compo

 

Sound about right?? any advance on this with terminology wise

I will be clutching a copy of surfaceagentx20 post no11

 

Still not sure where this 16days is stated and what is CPR 6

 

thanks guys

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks underdog13 you re a star

 

although I cant see the wood for the trees:cool:

 

6. ????? I see there is 50 points to 6 but on searching for 14 days +2 days service i find nothing, you still there please advise

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

A DN must allow 14 clear days to comply. They must also allow time for service of the DN; otherwise they could take 13 days to post it to you, leaving you no time to comply, if you get my drift.

 

Most DNs are sent by post nowadays. CPR 6 deals with service of documents. This states the length of time a document is deemed to be served on; ie 2 business days for first class post, etc.

 

I know it's a lot to take in at first - keep ploughing through it and you'll get there:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for advice will get my plough out first thing in morning.

 

...................O-o\............CPR................

 

good night and thankyou

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

okay deep breath heres what I will say in court, feel free to shoot me down.

 

Dear Sir

 

I am requesting the CCJ be removed and outstanding claims written off because:

The Default Notice is defective for failing to conform to the prescribed terms, of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (88.2) and I have been consequently disadvantaged.

The default Notice dated 1st March 2007 states a remedy date of 15th March 2007 and does not allow 14 days + 2 days service as per Civil Procedure rules Part 6.

This fact cannot be ignored and I quote the case

per Kennedy LJ in Woodchester v Swayne [1998]

'This statute was plainly enacted to protect consumers, most of whom are likely to be individuals. When contracting with a large financial organisation they are at a disadvantage. The contract is likely to be in standard form and relatively complex with a number of detailed provisions. If the hirer is said to have broken its terms, the hirer needs to know precisely what he or she is said to have done wrong and what he or she needs to do to put matters right. The lender has the ability and the resources to give that information with precision. If he does not do so accurately then he cannot take what Mr Gruffyd conveniently referred to as "the next step"

Failure of a Default Notice to be accurate not only invalidates such Notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd v Swain & Co NLD 14 July 1998 ), but is an unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the Court enforcing any alleged debt (Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2003] UKHL 40, Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1088, Wilson v Pawnbrokers [2005] EWCA Civ 147) but would also give the Claimant a claim for damages in the sum of £1,000 (Kpohraror v Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 All ER 119)

I am claiming damages to the sum of £15000 to cover damage to my credit file and loss of equity in my property as have been unable to sell due to the CCJ on my file.

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

morning

 

i think you might be jumping the gun to begin with,

 

the first thing that needs to be done is getting the judgement set asside

 

i believe thats an n244 form from memory but confirm with the court,

it will cost 75 quid

 

claiming damages comes later as a ccj has allready been granted,

you are trying to get it set asside to prior judgement

 

it looks ok but dont request damages yet, that comes later

 

by the way

 

any damages to your credit standing has to be proven in black and white,

the 500 quid extra, that is

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Morning

 

Not got time to apply for n244, court day is 22nd april so will ask on the day to set CCJ aside because it should never have been issued in first place.

 

Also I was after 15K damages:eek: for equity loss this is easily proved in current climate, but will leave that bit out like you suggest.

 

Will keep you posted on what happens on the day.

 

thanks

dan

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, did anyone find out if they can charge you the full amount of interest for the full term if it was terminated by them early?

 

also, on my credit agreement, the cash price of the car is 200 bucks more than it says on the actual sales invoice i got at the time...is there anything i can do with that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

 

No I did not get an answer to this, but after posting my docs online people spotted the default notice was invalid, going to give it a shot in court.

 

I recommend you start a thread and post your docs online, if you re lucky the good guys on here normally have a look for you.

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well i went to court and the original judge was not their mmmmmm?

 

Judge I saw said I needed to do a N244 to get the ccj set aside (spot on postggj)

He gave the charging order even though I threw every possible reason at him, so my only hope is to get the CCJ set aside which costs 75 quid to try.

Thing is will I be wasting my money????????????????????????

The judge did say the "the point was valid" about not getting the 14 days+2 days service on the default notice. He also asked why I said nothing before and I replied not aware, is this okay?

 

What do you guys think, 75 pounds is alot of cash to me.

 

cheers

dan

Take Control

! Use excel to document all your income and outgoings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...