Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That is a big improvement Dave and I do agree that it s best to leave it till the last moment to prevent VCS from countering your WS. [usually using doubtful logic that can't be easily argued against in a Court atmosphere] However my first post [no. 32] about the contract is the one that really exposes Jake's flummery and calls into  question jost how close he comes to committing perjury. And that is what hopefully VCS will not want questioned by a Judge. 
    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

all new to me


stmark
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5464 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi we ve been to the c.a.b and have been advised it would be a good idea to challenge our credit card agreements, some of which are 20yrs old .

unsur as how to pursue this have been reading various threads and dont know which letter is best to send first.

 

 

 

the cards we are looking at are hsbc ( which was originally acces card by midland bank) this is the oldeest.

 

mbna

capital 1

m &s which was originally a store card

hsbc gold

is there a limit to the amount you can claim some have largish balances on.

 

all help required please itsvery daunting. thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best thing you can do is send a CCA request to them. This then gives them 12+2 working days to supply a copy of a valid, enforceable agreement. Send the following letter, recorded delivery. Include a £1 postal order and PRINT do not sign your name.

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re: Account no: xxxxxxxx

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77(6) will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

 

 

Yours etc

 

Try and post their replies and/or documents they send on here (removing all personal details). If they do not send an enforceable agreement within the timeframe, you can then LAWFULLY stop paying them until they do produce something.

 

Hope this helps :)

 

p.s. There is no limit to the amount you are disputing ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that but whats the difference between this letterand the other letter youcan send , one is actually asking for the signed copy and not quoting the conumer credit act, what arethe implications of sending the letter you suggested and the other one , this is where me not being so bright gets confused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can send either letter. The other one is demanding a true signed copy. Even though that is what you are asking with the above letter, there is a loophole these people like to use to avoid sending you "a true copy of the original agreement".

 

The choice is yours :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

if I send them these requests and it is found out there is nothing wrong with theagreements will we get black marks against our credit rating for asking for these.It just seems a little frightening threatening to stop payments we have never defaulted on any of our payments or had any bad credit ratings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if I send them these requests and it is found out there is nothing wrong with theagreements will we get black marks against our credit rating for asking for these.It just seems a little frightening threatening to stop payments we have never defaulted on any of our payments or had any bad credit ratings.

 

If you have not defaulted and the agreements come back enforceable, then continue making payments. You will receive no marks on your credit file for requesting a copy of your agreement.

 

For any that come back unenforceable, you can of course stop paying. Even though they should not mark anything on your credit file (as there is no agreement between the 2 parties agreeing to this), it does not mean they will not try. You can, of course, request any information they place on your file to be removed - usually by threatening court action.

 

Hope that helps you a little.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that guess we need to be brave and bite the bullet, are any companies easier to deal with than othe s . I know my oldest card was originally the midland bank access card and somewhere along the line it changed when hsbc took over this card must be nearly 20yrs old.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The older the card, the less likely there is an enforceable agreement.

 

Ultimately, don't be scared of these people. They may send you many letters (if the agreements aren't valid) telling you all sorts is going to happen. They will more than likely pass on the debt to a collection agency (which they cannot do if the account is in dispute). DO NOT PANIC - if this happens, come back here and you will get all the advise you need. Trust me, have a good read around the forum, and you will see you have absolutely nothing to fear.

 

I have been there, been scared and worried. I buried my head and the debt got worse. Then I found CAG and have not looked back.

 

Good luck, and post here if you have any questions, no matter how small or big they may be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do u suggest we tackle all the cards at once or one at a time, i thought the older ones were more likely to be wrong, dont know why.

I do appreciate your advise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is up to you. If you keep separate files for each creditor then you will be ok. Or, why not try one first (I suggest Capital one as these are the worst at having unenforceable agreements) to see the kind of response you get, then you will know what to expect from the others??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok - been advised you use the other letter.

 

Dear Sirs

 

Account number

 

I write with regards to the above account with your organisation.

 

I respectfully request that you provide me by return a copy of the credit agreement which bears my signature. I require this as i have reason to believe that there may be discrepancies within the agreement which may leave it improperly executed.Additionally i require the underwriting sheet or other document showing any commissions paid to you by the broker or by you to the broker

 

(If you have any other reasons why you need the agreement such as misselling of PPI Add it here)

 

obviously if the agreement is improperly executed i would be entitled to ask the court to consider the agreement and make a declaration of the rights of parties to the agreement.

 

I must stress this request is NOT made pursuant to section 78 Consumer Credit Act 1974 but is made pursuant to the Civil Procedure Rules ( Pre action protocols and Part 31.16) and therefore unsigned copy will not suffice, only a copy of the original contract in its unaltered form will suffice in these circumstances

 

Please confirm if you still hold a copy of my signed agreement and that you will provide me with this document.

 

I do not view this as an unreasonable request given that by supplying the document which i have asked for it will allow me to assess if my case has merit and will help to resolve matters possibly without the need to involve the court and will undoubtedly save costs on both sides

 

I look forward to your reply and wouyld ask for a response by 4pm on XXXX Date ( Give 21 days to respond)

 

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

For all of them. Start with MBNA first and see what happens. Try and scan and post anything you receive on here (blank out personal details). You will get all the help you need :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I wrote to cap 1, M and S, and MBNA, requesting the signed cca. M and S wrote back saying they could not prove who I was as I had not signed the request letter. I already have a reply organised for them. Capial one sent me an unsigned copy of their terms and conditions. Which is the best reply for this one?

Finaly, the most confusing is that mbna have not replied at all and a reply is now well overdue. I repay them over £300 a month so should I stop, and if so should I tell them why first, and in writing? The original letter I sent was by registered. Indeed should I stop paying all of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...