Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sacked from driving job


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4223 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi People,

I've come across a problem which my brother has and I think it's unjust, wonder if anyone can point me in the right direction.

 

Basically, my bro is (was?) a class 1 (hgv) driver and had worked for the same firm for two years.

 

In November last, he had an accident; he doesn't remember what happened because he may have 'blacked out'.

Anyway, he went to hospital and was treated for minor injuries and released.

However, the hosptal wrote to his employer and told them that the accident may have been as a result of him 'blacking out'.

 

His firm sacked him on the spot.

Police wrote to him saying no further action;

No contact from the DVLA;

 

Question is, can his firm sack him for these reasons?

My gut instinct is they can't;

Another question is; is the hospital allowed to write to someone's employer with the above allegations?

My gut instinct is they can't.

 

The DVLA may well suspend his licence, all well and good till it's decided whether he's fit enough to drive large trucks safely, but it seems the hospital and his ex-employers have decided to be Judge and Jury on him without all the salient facts and a proper prognosis and diagnosis.

 

Any thoughts?

Were it not for injustice, Man would not know justice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, it depends.

People dont just black out without a reason, and obviously if he is prone to blackouts then he is not safe to drive.

 

Does he have any medical explanation for these blackouts?, there are several medical conditions which feature blackouts as a symptom.

Was he on any medication at the time that caused drowsyness or fatigue?, has he been having trouble sleeping?.

 

While his employers really shouldnt have just sacked him on the spot, they would be justified in stopping him from driving until it became clear as to why this happenned, did they give any reasons for doing so?.

 

as he has 2 years work with them he would be entitled to lodge a claim for unfair dismissal, however as to the reasons youre going to have to supply furthur info before we can figure out what went off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya thecatsdad - can only offer some support saw no one had actually written a reply as yet - oops i do apologise to godpikachu seems we were typing at the same time,,,

 

very sorry to hear of this have no legal knowledge on this only wondered whether your bro was part of any union?

 

im sure others far more experienced will come along later to give you good advice

 

it does sound very unfair, and i do hope that you get some positive steps to challenge this

 

take care and i will look in later to see if anyone has come along to help you

 

laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies;

Bit more background;

 

He isn't and wasn't prone to blackouts prior to this incident;

Since the accident he is being treated and tested for lung problems - congestive summat or other:

No drugs prior to incident;

 

Sleeping pattern was 'irregular' at best, he slept in the truck 5 nights out of seven and often moaned about how difficult it was to get good rest in motorway services truckstops - other trucks moving, fridges running all night, general noise.

I guess the above would go hand in hand with fatigue;

 

He's always been a lardy chap and driving a truck for a living, eating fatty foods, smoking, no exercise has helped pile on the weight, he's also early 50's.

 

Employers gave no reasons for his sacking apart from unable to employ 'due to hospital advice'. (Thankfully, in writing)

 

Angel, to answer your question, no Union, but I'm wondering if his car insurance has legal protection, might be worth a shot if he has.

 

Anyway, hope this helps, I'm just looking for a direction at the moment; since the accident he has been unable to do much for himself and he hasn't come into the 21st - or 20th, for that matter - century so no computer so I'm looking on his behalf.

 

Last thing, he doesn't want to drive if he is going to be prone to 'blackouts'; it was, and is, a terrifying incident for him to know that one minute he was driving happily along and the next to wake up in hospital. Praise God the only person hurt was him, but the alternative keeps him awake at night. His accident was on a deserted stretch of the A14 in Cambs, he wonders what the outcome would have been if it had happened on the M25 in rush hour.

 

Thanks for your help so far, we both appreciate your time, experience, knowledge and help.;-)

 

TCD

Were it not for injustice, Man would not know justice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, first thing i would advise is that he request a written reason from his employers for his dismissal, citing specific reasons for it, simply stating "on hospital advice" is not sufficient, as the hospital would not disclose his condition to anyone other than his family etc, and they dont "give advice" to employers.

I would also give CAB and ACAS a call and ask their opinion on it, as like i said he does have the right to tribunal and if they havent gone through a disciplinary process for his dismissal then he could claim for unfair dismissal.

 

Secondly, he needs to be getting himself to the doctors and finding out once and for all why these blackouts have started.

Obviously his age and general health, combined with the irregular sleeping pattern and lack of exersize in his job will probably cause his blood pressure to be sky high (a sign of high blood pressure is irregular sleep). One consequence of high blood pressure can be blackouts or at the worst, heart attacks or a stroke, so he needs to consult his doctor ASAP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, first thing i would advise is that he request a written reason from his employers for his dismissal, citing specific reasons for it, simply stating "on hospital advice" is not sufficient, as the hospital would not disclose his condition to anyone other than his family etc, and they dont "give advice" to employers.

 

 

Secondly, he needs to be getting himself to the doctors and finding out once and for all why these blackouts have started..

 

Hi Godpikachu

Yes, when I asked to see the letter of dismissal, he did say the employer didn't give him one at the time, but stated they wold post it out - that was three months ago, still no letter.

 

He has a copy of the letter the hospital sent to his employers and it is graphic in it's description of his condition.:-D

 

He is under a specialist at a hospital in Cambs who is testing him to discover what his condition actually is.

 

Thanks for the CAB/ACAS info, I shall get straight onto it.

 

Again, we are both most appreciative of your help.

Were it not for injustice, Man would not know justice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah....usually you can only lodge a claim for tribunal within 3 months of the end of employment, some claims can go through after this if there is a reason for it not being done earlier but thats something you would have to discuss with the CAB.

It is a bit suss that it took them a whole 3 months to send him a letter containing drivel though isnt it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah....usually you can only lodge a claim for tribunal within 3 months of the end of employment, some claims can go through after this if there is a reason for it not being done earlier but thats something you would have to discuss with the CAB.

It is a bit suss that it took them a whole 3 months to send him a letter containing drivel though isnt it?

 

I've checked the 3 month limit and if you can prove sickness then it's extended to 6 months, I think we can do that easily.

 

So far they haven't sent him squat, the letter he got from the hospital is clearly marked as his cc but pointedly addressed to his employers.

 

It's statement and evidence gathering time now methinks.

 

'preciate your help:)

Were it not for injustice, Man would not know justice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, well in that case he needs to write to them, sending it by recorded delivery, stating words to the effect of..

 

"on (date) i requested full reasons behind my dismissal providing to me in writing, you have not as yet supplied this information, which is a legal requirement.

Therefore i have no choice but to take this matter before an employment tribunal and treat it as unfair dismissal."

 

go and get a form ET1 form the CAB, fill it in and return it ASAP, the clock is ticking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it normal for hosp to advise employers of treatment let alone drawing conclusions from an incident; sounds like breach of confidentiality to me!

What does his GP say, further tests etc.

Employer must give grounds for dismissal, a letter from hospital would not be sufficient! IMO. Has he been given any compensation in liue of notice or redundacy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sometimes have to tell folk that they can no longer drive (for x long) due to a DVLA licence restriction as a result of a health problem. I would always tell the individual and advise them to notify the DVLA - if I (in consultation with the MDT) felt they were likely to ignore the restriction the hospital MAY write to the DVLA/GP (to protect the public) but I have never known us write to the employer :eek: I would have thought this was a confidentiality breach.

 

I would be complaining to the hospital concerned.

 

I would also be questioning why the employer hadn't redeployed the worker as driving restrictions are usually time limited.

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

BUMPITY BIG BUMP

As is my occasional wont, I visit this fine site intermittently, usually when I have a small issue - compared with others here - or just to have a browse.

 

In honesty, a few years ago, I was hip deep in the smelly stuff, but with good fortune, a very tight belt and the help and love of a very good wife, I've got through it, so it is possible if you try hard enough and get the breaks.

 

Anyway, one of my personal gripes - and i'm probably not alone - is that after people come on here with terrible issues and get advice - good, bad or indifferent - we never hear the outcome. Even if things don't go right after being on here and absorbing the said advice, it would be useful to know the outcome so that the advisors know their advice was right - or wrong.

 

So to that end, I'm going to fill the blanks on a couple of my post's tonight.

Firstly this one. The story is above so I wont re-hash it.

 

I filed an ET claim against the Company my brother worked for - this was allowed under the time limit constraint as I had hospital records showing he was in hospital at the three month limit; ACAS became involved - as they do - and they mediated between us. The Company was a complete pain in the posterior, refusing to negotiate, being abusive and basically painting my brother as an unreliable worker. (He undoubtedly was, but as they didn't keep records of his 'warnings', they managed to shoot themselves in the foot).

ACAS were very good, I think below the surface they had sympathy for our case but were too professional to show it outwardly and they negotiated a cash settlement which was very favourable to us, allied with a written reference which swerved the issue of them giving 'no reference'.

So a win.

 

In reference to the medical issue here; brother was diagnosed with 'sleep apenoa' (spelling might be off there), which was related to his weight and work lifestyle.

Did DVLA get involved? Probably not. Did I advise him to seek incapacity benefit and get away from driving? Yes I did. Did he get it? No. Is he still driving? I don't know, but probably, yes. (We have since 'fallen out' and don't speak to one another now).

 

So thank you to all that took an interest and I used some of the advice, disregarded other, but got through it.

 

You are - generally unheralded - stars.

 

Ian

Were it not for injustice, Man would not know justice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...