Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well the difference is that in all our other cases It was Kev who was trying to entrap the motorist so sticking two fingers up to him and daring him to try court was from a position of strength. In your case, sorry, you made a mistake so you're not in the position of strength.  I've looked on Google Maps and the signs are few & far between as per Kev's MO, but there is an entrance sign saying "Pay & Display" (and you've admitted in writing that you knew you had to pay) and the signs by the payment machines do say "Sea View Car Park" (and you've admitted in writing you paid the wrong car park ... and maybe outed yourself as the driver). Something I missed in my previous post is that the LoC is only for one ticket, not two. Sorry, but it's impossible to definitively advise what to so. Personally I'd probably gamble on Kev being a serial bottler of court and reply with a snotty letter ridiculing the signage (given you mentioned the signage in your appeal) - but it is a gamble.  
    • No! What has happened is that your pix were up-to-date: 5 hours' maximum stay and £100 PCN. The lazy solicitors have sent ancient pictures: 4 hours' maximum stay and £60 PCN. Don't let on!  Let them be hoisted by their own lazy petard in the court hearing (if they don't bottle before).
    • Thanks for all the suggestions so far I will amend original WS and send again for review.  While looking at my post at very beginning when I submitted photos of signs around the car park I noticed that it says 5 hours maximum stay while the signage sent by solicitor shows 4 hours maximum stay but mine is related to electric bay abuse not sure if this can be of any use in WS.
    • Not sure what to make of that or what it means for me, I was just about to head to my kip and it's a bit too late for legalise. When is the "expenditure occured"?  When they start spending money to write to me?  Or is this a bad thing (as "harsh" would imply)? When all is said and done, I do not have two beans to rub together, we rent our home and EVERYTHING of value has been purchased by and is in my wife's name and we are not financially linked in any way.  So at least if I can't escape my fate I can at least know that they will get sweet FA from me anyway   edit:  ah.. Sophia Harrison: Time bar decision tough on claimants WWW.SCOTTISHLEGAL.COM Time bar is a very complex area of law in Scotland relating to the period in which a claim for breach of duty can be pursued. The Scottish government...   This explains it like I am 5.  So, a good thing then because creditors clearly know they have suffered a loss the minute I stop paying them, this is why it is "harsh" (for them, not me)? Am I understanding this correctly?  
    • urm......exactly what you filed .....read it carefully... it puts them to strict proof to prove the debt is enforceable, so thus 'holds' their claim till they coughup or not and discontinue. you need to get readingthose threads i posted so you understand. then you'll know whats maybe next how to react or not and whats after that. 5-10 threads a day INHO. dont ever do anything without checking here 1st.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Littlewoods and Great Universal CCA requests


TickledPink
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5519 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've got two mail order accounts on my credit file. I wrote requesting a CCA for both. What prompted it was the fact that one of the accounts, with Great Universal, isn't mine. There is a very similar address in the area and I've already had one Fraud entry corrected by Experian as it belonged to the other address.

 

Their debt collectors were informed of this some time ago and they stopped chasing me for it. However, the entry and defaults on my file continue to be updated for this account.

 

The other one, with Littlewoods, is a much larger account (£2300). However, I've also requested a copy of the CCA for this account. At the time we were using the account we were doing well with it and as a result they kept on increasing the credit limit. Unfortunately my other half also had access to the account and she doesn't have much self control when it comes to shopping.:rolleyes: It got to the point where I could see problems ahead and during one phone call with them, I asked them to reduce the credit limit. The woman on the phone refused and practically laughed at me saying "well, just don't spend it." Great advice.

 

They've sent me the credit agreements but they're unsigned and not the originals. They're just generic.

 

Having said that, I have noticed the first entry on the agreement:

 

"Credit Limit - We will periodically fix the credit limit and notify you of it."

 

I never received any notifications to my knowledge. The first we ever knew of any change to the limit was when a statement arrived or when we logged on to my online account.

 

I have never made a payment to the Great Universal account but apparently have made a payment of £13 to the Littlewoods account in the last 12 months.

 

Where do I stand with getting these two accounts wiped out?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The catalogue companies are famous for having unenforceable agreements, particularly the older ones. What they have sent you are useless, they are trying to use smoke & mirrors to convince you that they have supplied an enforceable CCA so send the 'in dispute' letter to them.

 

As for the GU catalogue, the only thing I can suggest is to write to their 'fraud department' reminding them that they have already supposedly dealt with this account.

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

 

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**.

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

This limit has expired.

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

 

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

 

PRINT NAME (DON'T SIGN)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for hijacking this thread, which address is best to CCA Littlewoods I am trying to help a friend who has not given me any paperwork.

 

Thanks S

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

The address I used was:

 

Credit Account Management

PO Box 650

Weybridge

KT13 3EN

 

I took this from my creditexpert report.

 

The address on the letter I received from Littlewoods was:

 

Littlewoods

Innovation House

Park Lane

Liverpool

L71 1LR

Edited by TickledPink
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting around to writing the letters to Littlewoods/Great Universal. Unfortunately I'm in two minds as to how to approach it. Should I send a copy of the template letter to each, or send the template to Littlewoods and inform them of their error in the letter to Great Universal?

 

As they're both the same company with the same accounts department, what might happen if it goes to court, notwithstanding the fact that they can't supply the relevant CCAs? Would it seem like I'm agreeing that I had an account with Littlewoods but not with Great Universal and, as such, I am liable to pay the amount claimed by Littlewoods?

 

It's a tricky one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the 'in dispute' template you kindly provided.

 

My gut feeling on the provisions of the CCA that we're working with is that it's intended, in part at least, to force creditors to prove that the account belongs to the person disputing the account and to prevent the situation I have with the Great Universal account (i.e. not mine). Therefore notwithstanding that it isn't my account, my feeling is that the 'in dispute' letter should be used for that as well as the Littlewoods account.

 

Am I right? Or wrong as usual? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just had my first result.

 

As mentioned in one of my previous posts I had asked Littlewoods/Great Universal for copies of my credit agreement. They only supplied generic agreements. I wasn't sure what to do about it since, although the Littlewoods account was mine, I had never had a Great Universal account.

 

Anyway, just checked my Experian report again and both defaults on these accounts have been taken off.

 

Now, I've just got another four defaults and a CCJ to try and do something about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to take some doing with some of the others, though.

 

Natwest are being particularly uncooperative at the minute. They've confirmed with Experian that I apparently owe then more than £400 (of course ignoring the fact that they owe me close to £700) and that it's all charges. Experian won't take the default off without Natwest's consent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...