Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Could anyone help - i really need it.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5573 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi i have a rather large problem (for me anyway) and wondered if anyone might have any ideas.

 

Been working in my job with local council for 10 years doing 14 hours per week. I also have another seperate job which is 13 hours per week. We have recently had a restructure and i learned i was to be slotted into another post or i could apply for voluntary redundancy

 

My problem is the new post is at 20 hrs per week, different job title and rather than working 2 full days per week the hours will be spread over 5 days a week and just to top it off i am being downgraded by 2 grades = about 1.40 less per hour. I applied for voluntary redundancy and learned yesterday that it was not accepted and that i will be just slotted into this particular post. It now means that i cannot work my second job and i cannot survive monetarily solely on just one job (either of them) so am going to have to give up both jobs and find a full time job which in these climates i know is going to be difficult.

 

My question is can they just do this ie up my hours by 6, downgrade my pay, completely different structure in working hours, change my job title and description and also i will be expected to travel to various locations rather than just the one i am working at at the moment. I have to say i was hoping to get the redundancy as it would have given me a start money wise until i found another job and i also could have continued with second job - now im completely and utterly stuck.

 

Would really appreciate any help anyone could give me on this. Quite a lot of us have been affected by this and to me it seems crazy that they can do this but because its a council we are expected to go along with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi im not in the union but other people who work with me are - the union have not agreed to the conditions the council are implementing but the council are going ahead anyway. The problem is people are not speaking up because they think that because they are a council they couldnt possibly be acting in the wrong way! The unions do not seem to be helping in the slightest and they are still trying to negotiate but this is going to be implemented on April 1st regardless

Link to post
Share on other sites

just dug my contract out - it states that i work 14 hours a week and what grade im on - it does state tho than i can be deployed to other libraries as and when needed and it doesnt state particular hours that i work. I questioned yesterday fiercly about breach of contract but he basically told me that my new post was considered to be a "similar job" and i should really be grateful to have one. All weekend workers who work 12 - 14 hours per week had their redundancy accepeted as it was considered too much too ask them to come in during the week as they might have other committments!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definitely no expert in this field, but two key things that you mentioned in your last post was that the contract that you currently have does state your current grade and the amount of hours you work a week. In my opinion, that really is something that they shouldnt be able to change unless you've agreed to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definitely no expert in this field, but two key things that you mentioned in your last post was that the contract that you currently have does state your current grade and the amount of hours you work a week. In my opinion, that really is something that they shouldnt be able to change unless you've agreed to it.

 

Pretty well agree with this post and would say that if implemented this would consitute a material change to your working conditions.

 

However, if there has been adequate consultation between staff and employers then changes can be made for "Business" reasons.

 

Do you know if there were any discussions with senior staff regarding the change in hours etc ?

 

If the council are going to try to "railroad" these changes through then you will have reasonable grounds to raise a grievance and follow the procedures per your employers grievance policy.

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there has been a consultation for the last few months but between whom i dont really know. We underlings certainly havent been consulted. Also as i mentioned before the unions did not like what the council were doing and pulled out of the consultations. Thing is its all above my head i just work there. We were only told exactly what was happening on Wednesday although rumours have been flying for a couple of months. Changes will be started April 1st although still nothing in writing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just dont know where to go from here and have no time - i have to give a month notice to either employer or im in breach of contract so need to do that today more or less as i cannot continue to work both jobs with these new hours. I was also told the minute i set foot into work on the 1st April it would mean that i would be accepting the new terms and conditions and contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just dont know where to go from here and have no time - i have to give a month notice to either employer or im in breach of contract so need to do that today more or less as i cannot continue to work both jobs with these new hours. I was also told the minute i set foot into work on the 1st April it would mean that i would be accepting the new terms and conditions and contract.

 

Whoever is telling you this nonsense is mis-informed, by going into work on the 1st April does NOT mean you are accepting the new terms. You have rights as an employee and you should not be treated in this way.

 

I would suggest that as you have not had any solid information from your employer in writing that there are going to be changes -- wait.

 

Options will become clearer-- the employers have to give you notice of the change in T&C's if they do not they are in breach of the WTR (Working Time Regulations). Now it may be that as you say you are not in a position to know exactly what is going on and therefore the heresay has manifested itself into something that it is not.

 

Remember you have done nothing wrong, if all else fails you can go into work on the 1st of April and work your hours as normal. This sounds to me like the employer does not want to pay your redundancy pay and are trying to ease you out of the door.

 

You have 3 months after leaving a job to enter a grievnace and possible constructive or wrongfull dismissal, and aslo the most compelling evidence of why employment tribunals fall in favour of the employee is because the employer did not follow the correct procedures.

 

Beau

Please note: I am not a lawyer and as such any advice I give is purely from a laymans point of view;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...