Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

British Gas - one heck of a pickle!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5501 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all :)

 

I've been reading these forums for some time but never posted.

 

Before I jump in I just need to clarify something,

 

I have an electricty bill from British Gas for a previous address. On the back of the bill everything is estimated (going to get into that later). For each period on the bill (of which there are three) I have this...

 

{Previous}--{Recent}

{51946}----{52012} 66 over 2 days

10 Mar 07 - 11 Mar 07

estimated - estimated

First 5kWh at 17.575p Next 61 kWh at 9.916p

 

{52012}----{53342} 1330 over 45 days

12 Mar 07 - 25 Apr 07

estimated - estimated

First 111 kWh at 16.699p Next 1219 kWh at 9.422p

 

{53342}----{54531} 1189 over 49 days

26 Apr 07 - 13 Jun 07

estimated - we estimated your final reading

First 121 kWh at 15.764p Next 1068 kWh at 8.894p

 

= 237 kWh Tier 1 charges.

 

From the Britsh Gas website:

 

1. For single rate credit meters, Tier 1 rate applies to the first 125 kWh per quarter and all subsequent consumption is charged at Tier 2.

 

Does that seem correct, am I missing something?

Edited by Red5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all :)

 

I've been reading these forums for some time but never posted.

 

Before I jump in I just need to clarify something,

 

I have an electricty bill from British Gas for a previous address. On the back of the bill everything is estimated (going to get into that later). For each period on the bill (of which there are three) I have this...

 

{Previous}--{Recent}

{51946}----{52012} 66 over 2 days

10 Mar 07 - 11 Mar 07

estimated - estimated

First 5kWh at 17.575p Next 61 kWh at 9.916p

 

{52012}----{53342} 1330 over 45 days

12 Mar 07 - 25 Apr 07

estimated - estimated

First 111 kWh at 16.699p Next 1219 kWh at 9.422p

 

{53342}----{54531} 1189 over 49 days

26 Apr 07 - 13 Jun 07

estimated - we estimated your final reading

First 121 kWh at 15.764p Next 1068 kWh at 8.894p

 

= 237 kWh Tier 1 charges.

 

From the Britsh Gas website:

 

1. For single rate credit meters, Tier 1 rate applies to the first 125 kWh per quarter and all subsequent consumption is charged at Tier 2.

 

Does that seem correct, am I missing something?

 

Hi Red

 

Bill sculpting may have changed since then but Im not greatly sure. There have been instances on gas were the billed standard annual kwh then introducted a new billing system and started again even though the higher tier had already been reached.

 

Youre best giving them a call hunny :?

ARGH COMPLAINTS!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reason for asking, get coffee! :)

 

I moved house in May 2007, I telephone through my new address and meter readings which I duly followed up in writing (still have a copy of the letter). The gas bill eventually arrived at my new address and I paid it, this was after some involvement with a DCA (from this point on I assumed BG didn't have any record of me calling, or that they received my letter)

 

I kind of gathered BG were lax as I had lots of problems with them sending bills to different addresses with my name (on the same street), on one occasion BG attempted to cut my landlords (lived accross the road) gas off for a bill in my name that had nothing to do with either of us?! (turned out to be a business address 2 doors down) On another occasion a meter reader actually accused my wife of exchanging the electric meter, it wasn't the serial he had on his sheet (the wife ended up throwing him out). Another time they set a direct debit up without letting me know... completely out of the blue.

 

After quite a few letter exchanges with several DCA's I hit BG with a S.A.R in May 2008, as one particular DCA was chasing me for an £835 bill! (I would have expected it to be around £150 pounds, which does work roughly when you apply the correct reading, not counting anything I had already paid!) I sent the statutory fee and requested a copy of the information they have and requested it under the CCA. They sent a letter back with the PO I sent saying they were not bound by the CCA. I sent another letter stating regardless of what they may/may not be bound by I still required this information and listed each paragraph under the DPA, they ignored this request completely.

 

In September 2008 I finally received a bill (I can only assume this was their response to my S.A.R, full statement of account!). The final 'estimate' is 550 units over the actual reading and there appears to be an outstanding figure (from a previous bill) of £562.63. There are no details of any payments I made.

 

I had a credit meter, which I paid for at the post office by payment card each month. Every now again BG would raise or lower monthly payments. As far as I can recall (honestly) I never missed 1 payment. In the seven years I lived at the address I never received a letter saying I owed them anything, disconnection notices or even demands for missed payments, except where my name appeared for different addresses (yes, my name appeared on no less than 3 different addresses on the same street according to BG).

 

The latter part of last year a lady from BG called, I tried to explain the situation, but ultimately I told her I would pay everything I (may) owe, but I had no intention of paying anything until the bill for the final quarter was corrected and they had sent me statements so I could back track where this mysterious £562.63 had come from.

 

Didn't hear anything at all until I checked my credit report in January. Sure enough there is a default from BG for £835.63. Even admitting I owe the £562.63 (which I do not honestly believe I do) the amount shown on the default is inaccurate as this is an estimated bill and doesn't reflect the actual reading? I sent them (Andy Eley) another S.A.R on January 27th to which they have not replied. I sent the same S.A.R and copied it to Sam Laidlaw and Phil Bently on the 20th February.

 

I've contacted Experian and told them the information used to lodge the default is inaccurate and requested they remove it. They wrote to BG who have told them it should stand. I've asked for a copy of the information BG used to lodge the default in the first place and a copy of the statement that proves it's accurate, which has been ignored to date.

 

The gas and electricity supplies were arranged for by my landlord well before I moved in. I was told in no uncertain terms if I wanted to switch supplier I had to seek permission. The day I moved in I called BG and told them I was the new occupier and gave the start readings over the phone.

 

Strange thing, in the seven years I was there I had 4 meter reads (someone knocked on the door), 2 of those reads were done in the weeks leading up to moving. Yet, as you can see above each reading is estimate for that quarter?

 

What I could do with is some clear advice on the following,

 

1) I never signed a contract, nor did I verbally agree to any contract/terms and conditions (I was never asked to). BG never sent any T&Cs or gave me any indication as to what those T&Cs might be. Are they legally entitled to pass my personal information to DCAs/CRAs or would that fall into the 'unlawful' processing or similar category?

 

2) Consumer Direct advised this morning, as this was a domestic supply there would be no such contract (there are no contracts for domestic supplies? this can't be right??) and they didn't know if BG were duty bound to send any T&C's when I first moved in (completely confusing!!) I recorded this conversation...

 

3) Where do I stand with regard to notifying the CRA's the default is based on inaccurate information and their refusal to put it right?

 

4) Under the circumstances, is it reasonable for me to request back statements so I can ascertain where BG may have gone wrong? And is it reasonable for them just to completely ignore me? Are they required in any way to comply with my requests?

 

5) What, if anything else can I do to straighten this mess out?

 

This is seriously affecting me, I can't replace my car (my companies private car policy has requirements as to the maximum age they will allow) I have since been turned down for a credit card, despite the fact I have 4 in very good standing, not to mention my credit profile being almost Nun like except for this!

 

I really wish BG would have taken this to court last year, this might be sorted out now, I find it rather odd they didn't, unless they have something to hide do you think?

 

Any help with would be much appreciated!

Edited by Red5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reason for asking, get coffee! :)

 

I moved house in May 2007, I telephone through my new address and meter readings which I duly followed up in writing (still have a copy of the letter). The gas bill eventually arrived at my new address and I paid it, this was after some involvement with a DCA (from this point on I assumed BG didn't have any record of me calling, or that they received my letter)

 

I kind of gathered BG were lax as I had lots of problems with them sending bills to different addresses with my name (on the same street), on one occasion BG attempted to cut my landlords (lived accross the road) gas off for a bill with my name on it that had nothing to do with me (turned out to be a business address 2 doors down) On another occasion a meter reader actually accused my wife of exchanging the electric meter, it wasn't the serial he had on his sheet (the wife ended up throwing him out). Another time they set a direct debit up without letting me know... completely out of the blue.

 

After quite a few letter exchanges with several DCA's I hit BG with a S.A.R in May 2008, as one particular DCA was chasing me for an £835.00 bill! (I would have expected it to be around £150 pounds, which does work roughly when you apply the correct reading, not counting anything I had already paid!) I sent the statutory fee and requested a copy of the information they have and requested it under the CCA. They sent a letter back with the PO I sent saying they were not bound by the CCA. I sent another letter stating regardless of what they may/may not be bound by I still required this information and listed each paragraph under the DPA, they ignored this request completely.

 

In September 2008 I finally received a bill. The final 'estimate' is 550 units over the actual reading and there appears to be an outstanding figure (from a previous bill) of £562.63. There are no details of any payments I made.

 

I had a credit meter, which I paid for at the post office by payment card each month. Every now again BG would raise or lower monthly payments. As far as I can recall (honestly) I never missed 1 payment. In the seven years I lived at the address I never receive a letter saying I owed them anything, disconnection notices or even demands for missed payments, except where my name appeared for different addresses (yes, my name appeared on no less than 3 different addresses on the same street according to BG).

 

The latter part of last year a lady from BG called, I tried to explain the situation, but ultimately I told her I would pay anything I owe, but I had no intention of paying anything until the bill for the final quarter was corrected and they had sent me statements so I could back track where this mysterious £562.63 had come from.

 

Didn't hear anything at all until I checked my credit report in January. Sure enough there is a default from BG for £835.63. Even admitting I owe the £562.63 (which I do not honestly believe I do) the amount shown on the default is inaccurate as this is an estimated bill and doesn't reflect the actual reading? I sent them (Andy Eley) another S.A.R on January 27th to which they have not replied. I sent the same S.A.R and copied it to Sam Laidlaw and Phil Bently on the 20th February.

 

I've contacted Experian and told them the information used to lodge the default is inaccurate and requested they remove it. They wrote to BG who have told them it should stand. I've asked for a copy of the information BG used to lodge the default in the first place and a copy of the statement that proves it's accurate, which has been ignored to date.

 

The gas and electricity supplies were arranged for by my landlord well before I moved in. I was told in no uncertain terms if I wanted to switch supplier I had to seek permission. The day I moved in I called BG and told them I was the new occupier and gave the start readings over the phone.

 

Strange thing, in the seven years I was there I had 4 meter reads (someone knocked on the door), 2 of those reads were done in the weeks leading up to moving. Yet, as you can see above each reading is estimate for that quarter?

 

What I could do with is some clear advice on the following,

 

1) I never signed a contract, nor did I verbally agree to any contract/terms and conditions (I was never asked to). BG never sent any T&Cs or gave me any indication as to what those T&Cs might be. Are they legally entitled to pass my personal information to DCAs/CRAs or would that fall into the 'unlawful' processing or similar category?

 

2) Consumer Direct advised this morning, as this was a domestic supply there would be no such contract (there are no contracts for domestic supplies? this can't be right??) and they didn't know if BG were duty bound to send any T&C's when I first moved in (completely confusing!!) I recorded this conversation...

 

3) Where do I stand with regard to notifying the CRA's the default is based on inaccurate information and their refusal to put it right?

 

4) Under the circumstances, is it reasonable for me to request back statements so I can ascertain where BG may have gone wrong? And is it reasonable for them just to completely ignore me? Are they required in any way to comply with my requests?

 

5) What, if anything else can I do to straighten this mess out?

 

This is seriously affecting me, I can't replace my car (my companies private car policy has requirements as to the maximum age they will allow) I have since been turned down for a credit card, despite the fact I have 4 in very good standing, no to mention my credit profile being almost Nun like except for this!

 

I really wish BG would have taken this to court last year, this might be sorted out now, I find it rather odd they didn't, unless they have something to hide do you think?

 

Any help with would be much appreciated!

 

Lol I managed to read thew whole lot. Im working at the moment but will go through this in detail later. I can certainly help you with this.

ARGH COMPLAINTS!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

See

 

British Gas to sue Accenture over customer service hell | This is Money

 

Typical British Gas mess-up.

 

There should be no DCA involvemrnt until you have been billed correctly. Ignore any further letters and phone calls from a DCA and communicate with Briticsh gas only. If you get DCAs contacting you complain to OFT & FSA.

 

Have you used BG's complaints procedure yet - if not do so and if you get no reply complain to the regulator.

Edited by pelham9
Coorection DVA for CRA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I got a reply, they sent a bill/payment statement that lists what I paid and when I paid it (some of it appears to be missing)

 

Some facts and figures,

 

I moved in to my old address on Sep 1st 2000. The first real meter reading (everything else is estimated) is 8th Jan 2005 by my calculations that means,

 

From and including: Friday 1st September 2000 to, but not including Saturday 8th January 2005, is 1590 days from the start date to the end date, or 4 years, 4 months, 7 days without a reading?! I know for a fact I provided readings over the phone while trying to sort out one of the many problems I had, interestingly the start reading is missing altogether?

 

Entries between 19th Oct 2005 and 14th Apr 2006 have no readings what so ever, not even estimated? 2 lines between those dates read: Reading Removed? What does that mean??

 

Consumption based on readings British Gas say I provided or they attended:

 

08-Jan-05 to 12-Apr-05 1701 kWh used (94 days) {average 17.9 kWh} I’m not sure if that is high or not just going on the figures they’ve given me, but if it seems reasonable then winter to spring I could understand why the daily average would be slightly higher in the winter months.

 

12-Apr-05 to 14-Apr-06 5209 kWh used (367 days) {average 14.15 kWh}, for a full 12 months, I’d expect the daily average to be overall slightly less than above due to seasonal changes through a year.

 

14-Apr-06 to 29-Sep-06 4396 kWh used (167 days) {average 26.01 kWh a day}

 

The final reading according to the statement still does not reflect the actual date I moved out and the reading I provided. Although they do seem to admit I called but they didn’t for some reason record the readings I provided?!

 

They admit to not sending a final bill which would put them over the 12 months they can claim?

 

In simple terms does it look like I have a case? BG seem to want to complicate matters for some reason and everthing appears to be ok with my account until around Oct/Nov 2005, just goes down hill from there, their new billing system??

Edited by Red5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I got a reply, they sent a bill/payment statement that lists what I paid and when I paid it (some of it appears to be missing)

 

Some facts and figures,

 

I moved in to my old address on Sep 1st 2000. The first real meter reading (everything else is estimated) is 8th Jan 2005 by my calculations that means,

 

From and including: Friday 1st September 2000 to, but not including Saturday 8th January 2005, is 1590 days from the start date to the end date, or 4 years, 4 months, 7 days without a reading?! I know for a fact I provided readings over the phone while trying to sort out one of the many problems I had, interestingly the start reading is missing altogether?

 

Entries between 19th Oct 2005 and 14th Apr 2006 have no readings what so ever, not even estimated? 2 lines between those dates read: Reading Removed? What does that mean??

 

Consumption based on readings British Gas say I provided or they attended:

 

08-Jan-05 to 12-Apr-05 1701 kWh used (94 days) {average 17.9 kWh} I’m not sure if that is high or not just going on the figures they’ve given me, but if it seems reasonable then winter to spring I could understand why the daily average would be slightly higher in the winter months.

 

12-Apr-05 to 14-Apr-06 5209 kWh used (367 days) {average 14.15 kWh}, for a full 12 months, I’d expect the daily average to be overall slightly less than above due to seasonal changes through a year.

 

14-Apr-06 to 29-Sep-06 4396 kWh used (167 days) {average 26.01 kWh a day}

 

The final reading according to the statement still does not reflect the actual date I moved out and the reading I provided. Although they do seem to admit I called but they didn’t for some reason record the readings I provided?!

 

They admit to not sending a final bill which would put them over the 12 months they can claim?

 

In simple terms does it look like I have a case? BG seem to want to complicate matters for some reason and everthing appears to be ok with my account until around Oct/Nov 2005, just goes down hill from there, their new billing system??

 

 

Hi Red

 

Normally removed suggests a meter change/tariff change but Im puzzled as to what a space between the dates were unless they were readings that 'failed' and werent inline with previous usage.

 

The average electric usage is 15-25kwh depending on the size of the home (if it was storage heaters eg economy 7 or 10 this will be different averages)

 

With regards to the usage of 26kwh I doubt theres anything you can do now to check if it was running too fast or if there had been any changes that you cant remember, anything from leaving an immersion on to setting the heating at a low thermostat etc etc can effect this.

 

To clarify about the 1 year back billing rule. This only applies if the billing is the companies fault. Possibly with the delay in producing this bill you may have a case but if the account was billed BEFORE the year and it was simply finding your new address, you may not be so lucky.

 

Good luck Red

ARGH COMPLAINTS!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, forgot to mention, they also admit to sending bills to (a) different address on the same street with my name on it... only 1, which they say they corrected... NOT!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Red

 

Normally removed suggests a meter change/tariff change but Im puzzled as to what a space between the dates were unless they were readings that 'failed' and werent inline with previous usage.

 

The average electric usage is 15-25kwh depending on the size of the home (if it was storage heaters eg economy 7 or 10 this will be different averages)

 

With regards to the usage of 26kwh I doubt theres anything you can do now to check if it was running too fast or if there had been any changes that you cant remember, anything from leaving an immersion on to setting the heating at a low thermostat etc etc can effect this.

 

To clarify about the 1 year back billing rule. This only applies if the billing is the companies fault. Possibly with the delay in producing this bill you may have a case but if the account was billed BEFORE the year and it was simply finding your new address, you may not be so lucky.

 

Good luck Red

 

2 bedroom semi with gas central heating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something else that seems a little odd... on the bill they sent me toward the end of last year says:

 

{53342}----{54531} 1189 over 49 days

26 Apr 07 - 13 Jun 07

estimated - we estimated your final reading

First 121 kWh at 15.764p Next 1068 kWh at 8.894p

 

On the statement they sent me today it quite clearly says:

 

13-Jun-07 54531 Customer Meter Reading.

 

Ooook.... how and why would that change? A customer read estimate? Something doesn't smell right...

Edited by Red5
Link to post
Share on other sites

2 bedroom semi with gas central heating.

 

Im in a three bed semi and use around 30kwh. Im also on a combi boiler. And gas cooking with no gas heaters.

 

Im at work all day but tend to hammer the usage when I come in but during summer my usage is around 20-25kwh but again different homes, different levels of consumption.

 

With regards to that heavier period (during summer which is a little strange I admit), without physiaclly going to that house and removing that meter and doing a load test there is simply no way of proving something was seriously wrong.

 

Oh and just noticed your extra thingy majig there. Looks like that final read (their so called accurate one) has been worked out from the daily usage you carried. The complete situation is a shambles and Id be pulling my hair out by now!

ARGH COMPLAINTS!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact remains I did not provide a reading on 13-Jun, I wasn't even there at that time! It was mid May, and it wasn't 54531, it was 53981....

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact remains I did not provide a reading on 13-Jun, I wasn't even there at that time! It was mid May, and it wasn't 54531, it was 53981....

 

 

Then you must ask them to manually rebill Red.

 

There is actually a system that records all (billed) readings sent in by customer/data collector as well as start reads and finish reads for supplier changeovers. Its very likely that the reading they have done for the June (54531)will be on there as an estimated read. Just a bit of useless fact there. Sorry!

ARGH COMPLAINTS!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, based on what we know (or don't, as the case may be, I'm getting confused!) How are BG able to lodge a default, when it appears they know deep down the information they used to place it in the first place is inaccurate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date did you leave your old home?

 

Which DCAs were involved - it may have been their in house collectors?

 

Did you keep a record of the start meter reading in your old home?

 

Have you checked the meter number that they were billing? Has it been correct throughout?

 

Have they got the correct address for your old home on their database now?

 

Certainly they should never have put a default marker onto you account as the final bill has never been agreed. Write to them in these terms saying that you have never had a final and agreed account so why is there a default marker. Tell them to take it off. It is a waste of time going for Experian -they will always accept BGs word and they never make an in depth enquiry or require proof. Keep a record of any loan refusals or higher than normal interest rates you might have been offered and get evidence from the lender for their reasons. It may need court threats to get this marker off and it is as well to have all the evidence of detriment to you so that you can claim compensation. Make it a condition of accepting a final bill that the default is removed.

 

I am sure that you now realise that phoning means that you will talk to a sypathetic customer services's bod who is powerless. You will be told that this will be sorted or that they will ring back and nothing will happen. Write to them recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What date did you leave your old home?

 

Which DCAs were involved - it may have been their in house collectors?

 

Did you keep a record of the start meter reading in your old home?

 

Have you checked the meter number that they were billing? Has it been correct throughout?

 

Have they got the correct address for your old home on their database now?

 

Certainly they should never have put a default marker onto you account as the final bill has never been agreed. Write to them in these terms saying that you have never had a final and agreed account so why is there a default marker. Tell them to take it off. It is a waste of time going for Experian -they will always accept BGs word and they never make an in depth enquiry or require proof. Keep a record of any loan refusals or higher than normal interest rates you might have been offered and get evidence from the lender for their reasons. It may need court threats to get this marker off and it is as well to have all the evidence of detriment to you so that you can claim compensation. Make it a condition of accepting a final bill that the default is removed.

 

I am sure that you now realise that phoning means that you will talk to a sypathetic customer services's bod who is powerless. You will be told that this will be sorted or that they will ring back and nothing will happen. Write to them recorded delivery.

 

1) Approx May 20th 2007

2) Buchanan Clark + Wells (Oddly enough another popped out of the blue through the post this morning (not heard anything from anyone about this in nearly 12 months!) from Wescot threatening court action, oh I wish they would…..)

3) I did but no longer have it (was taken in Sep 2000)

4) I can't check the serial number as I haven't had the bills, I have asked for them but BG haven't sent them. BG Sent reading/estimate payment/bill print out that doesn't detail any other information.

 

I have no intention of phoning them at all, I've read quite a few forums that advise against this.

Edited by Red5
Link to post
Share on other sites

Checked just one at the moment, Experian.

 

The default was lodged mid December 2008. I've sent that letter by the way, asking them why they defaulted me while the account is in dispute.

 

Thats rather fast considering you had the bill not so long back!! Keep us informaed Red. Im actually having a similar problem but not with my utilities.:confused:

ARGH COMPLAINTS!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

14 days are up, they've not responded... how odd... NOT!

 

I think the only way I can go now is to send them a notice of intended court action, give them another 14 days and wait for them not to respond then file my papers.

 

Are there any guides to taking this to court?

 

What do you think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Case won!

 

British Gas has withdrawn the Default and agreed to re-calculate the final bill based on the actual final reading.

 

I just need to sort an issue with regard to their estimated bills, after I gave them actual readings now.= :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...