Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for the letter, that makes things a lot clearer. So it's a statutory demand rather than self-certifying. See what @Man in the middle thinks but to me, it seems as if the lawyer has a good strategy and seems to have covered all the bases. HB  
    • Could you post up the letter, with your personal info and their reference covered up, please? It should say Letter of Claim, but let's have a look just in case. HB
    • I know dx, a lot of it was my partner and how she felt about it. I also appear to be addicted to my credit file being clean. I still worry for my partner she has too much on as it is, but I am ensuring I manage both of ours so She can forget about. i guess in terms of time I bet masses are defaulting with this economy as it is right now and high interest rates might be the only thing going for me right now. I guess  I’ll find out
    • Please see below for an extract from the letter more about my case. You have been convicted of two matters of failing to give driver details linked to two speeding offences and been disqualified in your absence. You confirmed that you did not receive the court documentation and the first you knew about the cases was on 3/6/24. As you can make a statutory declaration it is possible that we will be able to persuade the police to accept pleas to either or both of the speeding offences as they were committed within a very short space of time and withdraw the two fail to give driver details offences as normally if you plead to one or other of the speeding or fail to give driver details the prosecution will withdraw the other related offence. If successful you would not face a totting ban. In respect of the speeding offences, it could be argued they were committed on one occasion due to the proximity of the time and location and we may be able to persuade the prosecution to drop one of the speeding offences. You are technically guilty of all the offences because you accept it was you driving when the speeding offences were committed and that you did not update your change of address with the leasing company when it was your responsibility. If the prosecution will not withdraw the two failures to give driver details offences, you will face a totting ban but will be able to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. This  may or may not go ahead at the court hearing date, so we need to prepare for all eventualities. As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge. The court have dealt with the matter very quickly and have actually listed your matter for an application to suspend the disqualification pending appeal on the above-mentioned date. We could actually use this date to make the statutory declaration in court having explained the situation to the magistrates and then see if the prosecution will agree to accept pleas to one or both of the speeding offences as a way of resolving the matter without the need for you to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. It is possible the case would need to be adjourned so that we can make those representations, or the court may want to go ahead and hear the exceptional hardship argument. The outcome of your case is always at the discretion of the Court.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Huge fine for no railcard - question


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5577 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yesterday I was on my return trip from London to Edinburgh with my family. Although I had not been asked for my railcard on my outbound journey, I was asked on the return and found it had expired last week. It was valid when I purchased the tickets.

 

The conductor was unrelenting and issued me with a fine of 406 pounds for 4 single journeys for the entire journey. At the time that he collected the tickets we were at Doncaster and I offered to take my family off the train in order to try to get the problem resolved there. He refused and took my details issuing me with the full fine as that is what I had intended to travel.

 

The railcard is one issue and a such a huge fine for an honest oversight is weighing on me heavily. I plan to purchase a new family railcard tomorrow and write a letter stating above. I understand that it should have been checked on the outbound trip and am not interested in landing that staff in it.

 

The second issue was how horrible the conductor was to me. I am 8 months pregnant, travelling with children and he was entirely loud and humiliating to me in front of an entire car of passengers - until I was in tears and my children were quite worried. He insisted on me going through my wallet and asked me to give him my debit or credit cards to pay for the journey immediately - which I refused as I felt I had a chance to contest the fine.

 

I guess my questions are these - how do I contest the fine for the return journey so they will not also charge me for new tickets on the outbound journey. Do I include a complaint about the poor treatment by staff in the letter or is this too aggressive?

 

Many, many thanks.

Janet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Janet.

 

Firstly, I am so sorry to hear about your awful experience. Sometimes you wonder if these people actually have any common sense, don't you? It's such a shame, and that you offered to take your family off the train to resolve the issue should have been reason enough for him to avoid fining you.

 

Secondly, you said your railcard has run out by the date you taken the journey? I think, because of that, it won't matter one bit that it was actually valid for when you purchased the tickets, as, when you boarded the train, it was invalid [had run out].

 

I was on a short journey Leeds to Manchester in January and forgot my railcard, and was fined a mere £16. I don't think you'll have had much luck contesting the fine/finding alternative options had you gotten off the train, as I went to the ticket office to explain and they said only think I could do was to purchase a whole new ticket. Which sucks.

 

I hope somebody can help you more than me, and I really do hope you do not have to pay the huge fine. But from what I can see he correctly fined you for having an invalid railcard for the journey, exactly the same as why I was fined, for having no railcard. Like I said before though, you'd really expect common sense to come into play :(

 

All the best..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I was on my return trip from London to Edinburgh with my family. Although I had not been asked for my railcard on my outbound journey, I was asked on the return and found it had expired last week. It was valid when I purchased the tickets.

 

The conductor was unrelenting and issued me with a fine of 406 pounds for 4 single journeys for the entire journey. At the time that he collected the tickets we were at Doncaster and I offered to take my family off the train in order to try to get the problem resolved there. He refused and took my details issuing me with the full fine as that is what I had intended to travel.

 

The railcard is one issue and a such a huge fine for an honest oversight is weighing on me heavily. I plan to purchase a new family railcard tomorrow and write a letter stating above. I understand that it should have been checked on the outbound trip and am not interested in landing that staff in it.

 

The second issue was how horrible the conductor was to me. I am 8 months pregnant, travelling with children and he was entirely loud and humiliating to me in front of an entire car of passengers - until I was in tears and my children were quite worried. He insisted on me going through my wallet and asked me to give him my debit or credit cards to pay for the journey immediately - which I refused as I felt I had a chance to contest the fine.

 

I guess my questions are these - how do I contest the fine for the return journey so they will not also charge me for new tickets on the outbound journey. Do I include a complaint about the poor treatment by staff in the letter or is this too aggressive?

 

Many, many thanks.

Janet

 

You may of course make a complaint if you feel that you were treated less than courteously by the member of staff. If what you say is true, and I have no reason to doubt it, then you should complain that you were treated badly.

 

The matter of the tickets is a separate issue. It may seem harsh, but the responsibility for checking that the railcard is valid at the time of travel is first and foremost yours as the traveller intending to use the card. Perhaps you feel that it should have been checked earlier, but the rail company is under no obligation to check it on every journey. The responsibility is merely that when a spot-check is made, the traveller offering the railcard must ensure it is in date before travelling.

 

I suggest that you should write to explain the position, confirming that you have made a separate complaint about the way you were treated and showing evidence that you renewed your railcard immediately you had an opportunity to do so, because it was an honest oversight.

 

The rail company may choose to waive or reduce any charges, but are not obliged to do so. Don't pile on the matter of the complaint unnecessarily, but give a truthful account.

 

Sorry it may not be what you had hoped for, but I hope that helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appeal against the fine to the correct address...

but also write to the customer services (should be able to find address on the train company's website) ... if the railcard was valid when you purchased your tickets but expired before you completed your journey you may be able to claim you were mis-sold??? It's worth a try as having read various posts it looks like if you didnt have a valid railcard you will have to pay all 4 fines OOCH!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appeal against the fine to the correct address...

but also write to the customer services (should be able to find address on the train company's website) ... if the railcard was valid when you purchased your tickets but expired before you completed your journey you may be able to claim you were mis-sold??? It's worth a try as having read various posts it looks like if you didnt have a valid railcard you will have to pay all 4 fines OOCH!

 

 

I am also sorry to hear that you may have been badly treated by a member of rail staff, but please do not get confused by references to fines and penalties. Referring to this matter as such will probably not help you to get any charges reduced.

 

Firstly, there isn't a Penalty Fare scheme that covers the journey from London to Edinburgh so what you have been asked for is not a penalty fare in the sense that it is a separate charge to a correct single fare.

 

Secondly, it seems that what you have been asked to pay is four single tickets for the journey that you made without a valid ticket. It is not a fine so it is best not to refer to it as such.

 

You could have a case to suggest you may have been mis-sold the tickets only if the clerk issuing them was told by you on what date and train you were travelling back and had the railcard in front of him/her at the tiime. That still does not mean it isn't your responsibility to check your railcard, but if you can show that you did this at the time of purchase you should say so.

 

I would suggest that you continue with the course of action that I outlined in my earlier post and if the TOC still insist on payment, see if they will reduce the claim to no more than the difference of fares on the one way journey, between what you paid and what would be payable without a railcard.

 

The matter of the member of staff attitude is a separate complaint, but is still valid. However, I think it worth acknowledging that whatever happened later on the train had no bearing on the fact that you boarded the train not realising your railcard had expired since you bought the tickets.

 

Whatever was said or done later in the journey will not alter that fact and that is the conclusion that any independent arbitor would come to.

 

If reported truthfully, the performance of the member of staff concerned might encourage the TOC to take a sympathetic view.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks very much for your responses - and so quick too!

 

I spoke with the 'Debt Recovery' at National Express this morning. I explained the situation and the total cost (not fine, you're right, fare ...) and she immediately said: 'Oh, don't worry, you won't have to pay all that.' Immediate relief.

 

She worked out what the fare would have cost had I bought the tickets without the railcard, deducted what I had already paid for the tickets and charged me the difference. Fare/Fair enough, since I understood that I had made a mistake to begin with. It did cost 70 pounds (still ouch, but a whopping lot better than what I feared), but I just paid that up. I was losing sleep and I really needed it to be settled.

 

I think I will also now make a complaint about the conductor since I can do that and show that I was an honest passenger who made an honest mistake that has since been corrected.

 

Thanks again for your input.

Janet

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, as is so often the case, getting the terminology right and contacting the right people rather than going in feet first all guns blazing will get a sensible resolution.

 

Yes, by all means continue with any complaint re the conductor and this ought to be dealt with by the specific TOC Personnel Manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest mc661

I have just read your original post and am horrified in the way that the member of staff treated you.

Being pregnant I would have thought that discretion would have come into the situation.

 

I think that the member of staff attempted to charge you the 4 singles is that he was going to get commission on them. Thats also why he didn't want you on the platform as you could (in his mind) run off, (in my mind unlikely).

 

Well done on getting the fraud people to reduce it.

 

I would also suggest a complaint to the customer relations about his attitude and actions. Also state the stress it put you under, and that stress for a pregnant lady is not a good idea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...