Jump to content


About Letter Before Action


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6420 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

Thought I had posted this,but here goes again.When sending the above letter

do I ask for the original amount which is over the £750 as I did in the first letter

or do I have to ask for the amount which I would be suing them for should my case come come to court?

 

Sorry if this has been answered before

best

Mike b

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mike

 

I have claimed the same amount as in my prelim letter, only when I go to the Sherriff Court am I breaking down my claim, in my case I am taking the returned charges separately from unauthorised overdraft charges .... this works quite well to keep it under £750 per claim.

 

HTH

 

T

I will not be held liable for any advice/comments given... if in any doubt please consult professional advice.

 

HBOS Acc1 - Small Claim Filed 31/07/06 - WON -21/8/06 - MCOL -06/09/06 - WON 13/09/06

 

HBOS acc2 -Small Claim Filed 02/08/06 - WON 13/09/06 - Round 2 Prelim Letter sent 14/09.06 - LBA sent 27/09/06 - MCOL 16/10/06

 

HBOS acc3 Prelim Letter sent 14/09/06 - LBA sent 27/09/06 - MCOL 16/10/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mike

 

I have claimed the same amount as in my prelim letter, only when I go to the Sherriff Court am I breaking down my claim,

T

 

ditto, only I am doing mine by date.

Bank of Scotland round 1: £740 + costs settled, still sore over the 8% grrr

Bank of Scotland round 2: £629 +101.15 interest +£39 costs settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same as above - remember to claim the earliest ones first though, just in case any of them are close to the 5 year deadline (you'd be suprised how many don't think of this, including... who.!? Me.!? :rolleyes: )

** I AM NOT A LAWYER, PLEASE CONSULT A QUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL IF YOU ARE IN ANY DOUBT **

 

I have successfully claimed against: "MBNA, Capital One, Bank of Scotland & Clydesdale Bank"

 

The Consumer Action Group is a Self-Help website, Moderators & Site Helpers offer advice on a voluntary basis. Please spend time reading the FAQ's, and other cases relating to your bank before starting your own claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

What's the significance of keeping the claim under £750??

 

Also, can we only claim for the last 5 years in Scotland?

 

Sorry, just discovered the site and going a bit google-eyed reading all the posts!!

RBoS Round One:

Subject Access Request sent 02.10.06

Prelim Approach For Repayment sent 23.10.06

LBA for £620 (round 1) sent 30.10.06

Partial Settlement Offer £374.00 received 4.11.06

Rejection of Settlement sent 6.11.06

Full Settlement of £620 offered 15.11.06

Ready for Round Two......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can only claim last 5 years in Scotland

and only claim £750 max in one go-if your claim is more than 750 wait till

you get paid and reclaim on the rest-making sure you don`t go over the 750

mark at any given time. this is to include your intrest at 8% for each period

and your court fee of £39 and your £10 for your back bank statements.

 

Mikeb

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back to me Mike. I'm glad I waited for a reply. I'm about to claim £900+ from RBoS! 2 stages it is then!!

RBoS Round One:

Subject Access Request sent 02.10.06

Prelim Approach For Repayment sent 23.10.06

LBA for £620 (round 1) sent 30.10.06

Partial Settlement Offer £374.00 received 4.11.06

Rejection of Settlement sent 6.11.06

Full Settlement of £620 offered 15.11.06

Ready for Round Two......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suze.

 

You can still claim in one go, its just that you have to use the "summary cause" route as opposed to the small claims one.

 

There is very little difference in the procedure - ALTHOUGH - If you end up losing in court, the judge "might" get you to pay for the banks legal costs. That said, absolutely noone has had to defend in court, so it is highly unlikely to get that far.

 

I am going down the summary cause route, and so have loads of others.

 

Hope this helps.

 

J:D

  • Confused 1

1/9/06 RBS claim #1

8/11/06 - claim settled

17/11 claim #2 started - incl creditcard

30/11 - CC statements received

31/11 - Prelims issued - RBS paying up, only M/C to go)

 

If any of my advice/ info has been helpful, please click the scales:D

 

Please also remember that any advice is given from my own experience and in good faith as a lay person. If in doubt, please contact a qualified professional:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi SUZ

Your wrong about no one having to go to court (WAJ) there is people from this site had to already go to court.Think you`l be better off Suz doing what I said.

One person I can remember from this site had the adjorned and told they had better prove to the court at the next hearing that the banks were taking money that was ilegal.Cant remember the post though but its happend alright.

 

mikeb

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...