Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
    • think about it, if you don't pay the full amount, what more can they do , default you  they've already registered a default notice by that point.  why have you got to await sale to a DCA.... for what?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

yes car and a default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Do not worry. They usually employ retired folk. Remember that a doorstep debt collector has NO LEGAL POWER whatsoever. They have no legal right to be on your property. There is no such thing as Balliffs in Northern Ireland so they cannot seize any property.

 

If they do appear.

 

1. Tell them to leave in words of your own choosing

2. Confirm nothing with them, do not get involved in ANY conversation.

3. If the do not leave when ordered telephone the PSNI and report a breach of the peace/disturbance/suspicious caller. If you have a female in the house who can scream in distress then this would be a bonus

4. Photograph the caller and take a note of the registration number of any vehicle they may be in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just saw your thread, and my OH is in a similar situation with Suzuki/Blackhorse - she returned the car to them, and they claim she still owes them the whole amount.

 

What we have done in our case so far was to CCA them and request that they clarify the remaining balance as the car was returned to them. I also used Parkers online historical car pricing to get an estimate of how much they should theoretically have deducted for the car. At the moment, we are still waiting for the CCA and clarification.

 

 

First thing I would like to ask, when was the last time you acknowledged the debt exists? (When you last made payment most likely)

Have you received statements since then? If so, how often?

Have you received any other comunication fro mthe OC in this time?

When was the first time you heard from the DCA?

Did they make the doorstep visit? If so, did you let them in? what did they do?

Can you post a copy of the letter the DCA sent (with personal information removed)?

 

 

As for the default you have, Did you ever receive a Default Notice? They have to issue a properly formed Default Notice before they can record a default on the credit file and before they can "terminate" the agreement (Sell it to a DCA / pass it to a DCA, demand the full amount). If they have terminated without issuing a fully compliant Default Notice, then they effectively loose their rights to claim anything beyond what was listed on the default notice and in some situation, you could claim compensation for unlawful recision of contract.

 

 

For the DCA - the original credit needs to have sent you a Notice of Assignment saying that they had passed / sold the account to a DCA. I take it you haven't had this either?

 

 

Are you sure they shut down? they still seem to have a site up (Direct Auto Finance) and all the details fit. From that link you posted, it looks like they forced PPI and "penalty" charges on their customers. If these are the same people, you should send them a Subject Access Request (costs £10) asking for a copy of any contract(s) they beleive exist, a full transaction history since the account was opened, a copy of any Default Notices, a copy of the Notice of Assignment, information about manual interventions, transcripts of all calls, etc.

 

From the information you get back from a SAR and a CCA, you should be able to determine:

 

  • If they have a valid, enforceable agreement
  • If there is PPI on the account and if it was mis-sold
  • If they have added any penalty charges
  • If they did send a Default Notice, and if they did whether it is compliant
  • If they sent a Notice of Assignment

 

 

now, the following is what I would personally do (If any more experienced CAGers think it's wrong, feel free to shoot me ;) ) I would send a letter to the DCA similar to the following by Recorded Signed for 1st class. You would need to fill in the bits in [bold square brackets].

[Your Address Here]

[Date]

[DCA Address]

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Re. Account Number: [account number DCA here]

 

To Whomever It May Concern,

 

You claim that you are acting on behalf of [insert OC] however I have heard nothing from [insert OC] since [date OC last contacted you] and I have had no Notice of Assignment from them to say that you would be dealing with this debt.

 

As such I would request that you supply me with some proof that you have a right to collect on this alleged debt. I would also request some proof that this alleged debt actually exists and that the balance you claim is accurate. An exact copy of the original credit agreement, a copy of any Default Notices, a copy of the Notice of Assignment that should have been sent and a current statement of account would be sufficient proof.

 

At the moment, your demand for payment is akin an unknown person on the street claiming that I owe them money and trying to extort payment by threat. As such, I respectfully request some proof to corroborate your claim. An exact copy of the original credit agreement, an exact copy of and Default Notices that were issued, a copy of the Notice of Assignment that should have been sent and a current statement of account would be sufficient proof. Please note – this is NOT a request under S.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

Furthermore, I would request that any future contact regarding this account be done in writing only. Any telephone calls or doorstep visits will NOT be entertained. Any visitors to my premises will be asked to leave and treated as trespassers.

 

Any telephone calls made to myself will be recorded and I am of the view that if you insist on harassing me by telephone you will be in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 and the Communications Act (2003) s.127. I reserve the right to report you to any authorities and official bodies as I see fit, including, but not limited to, OFCOM, Trading Standards, The Office of Fair Trading and the Police.

 

 

Additionally, you should also be aware that while this account is in dispute, you are not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute. This includes, but is not limited to:

·You may not demand any payment on this account

·You may not add any further interest or charges to this account.

·You may not pass this account to any third party.

·You may not register any information in respect of this account with any of the credit reference agencies.

·You may not issue a default notice related to this account.

 

I expect your reply with the requested information within fourteen (14) days.

 

Regards,

[Print your name, Don't Sign]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any updates on this ?

Who is the DCA that threatened to come in 7 says ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

hi ii had moorcroft at my door wanting me to settle the bill i asked if they had the credit agreement -------then i said i do not know any thing about the debt she daid she will return it to the office and went away i hope she does not come back-----------i hope i did the right thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

ok sorry was away on holiday and very busy at work but now i am getting home visits not sure when but it seem they knock once and slip a letter under the door saying they were here !!! Well its been over a month or 2 now and no credit agreement im going to send the account in dispute letter now or is there some other letter i need to send

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so i sent the account in dispute letter today but not sure if they going to respond to it seems like they want me to reply saying that the debt is not mine or something and that's why they sent back the postal order !!

 

i have the same problem with clarity a cca them and they sent back the postal order with a letter saying the have returned the account back to there client and i have to wait for a respons from there client

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok these guys are just playing dumb now they sent me a final notice letter the same one they sent me right in the beginning !!!!

 

now what ? what would my next step be ? do i cca hillesden securities ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

MrTs dead right.

I would ring TS and OFT up first and follow up with a letter telling them you are being harassed by these good for nothings and briefly explain the situation.

As above seek Police advice (maybe CAB Legal can help you out on this one) you can ring the police and state that they are hounding you and will not take no for an answer and ask what can you do about it (saying you have told them to stop calling and have you put it in writing coz you can then also state that you wrote on such a date and have told them verbally on such a date.)

DG:)

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i got this in the post now

 

Dear Sir

 

Thank you for your recent letter requesting a copy of the signed agreement in connection with the above debt.

 

Can you please clarify in writting if you are stating categorically that you did not sign an agreement relating to the above outstanding debt. On receipt of this written assurance from you we will contact the original creditor and revert you.

 

Please note however the agreement was signed or not is an evidential matter,wich does not necessarily require production of a copy signed agreement to satisfy the courts that the agreement was signed.

 

In these circumstances we believe that it is in your own interest to respond with a realistic payment plan or offer of settlement on the above account and look forward to hearing from you.

 

ok this is the secound time they sent me this and i didnt even request a cca now it was the account in dispute letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to start fighting fire with this company.

Which DCA is it by the way?

Anyway - report them to all the authorities i mentioned.

Do not speak to them on phone/refuse to answer security questions/insist everything in writing only.

Do not give them any information whatsoever - they have no legal authority to it or any payments off you.

Only the county court has these powers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...